Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

Improved Essays
Loyalty is defined as a devotion to a person, country, group, or cause. Loyalties can conflict with each other and one would have to choose, but could that justify killing a person? In Shakespeare Julius Caesar, Brutus, Caesar’s best friend joined Cassius and other conspirators to kill Caesar justifying it by their loyalty to their country, Rome. They believed that Caesar is getting too powerful and his power is going to his head and will damage the republic. At Caesar’s funeral, both Brutus and Antony, Caesar’s noble friend give speeches that included different strategies to affect the audience’s feelings and thoughts. Antony delivered a more effective speech than Brutus by using many rhetorical devices including irony, pathos, . By making his speech emotional and manipulative, Antony convinces the people of Rome to avenge Caesar's death with him.
In their speeches, both Brutus and Antony use irony to appeal to the people’s emotions and convince them of different beliefs. One example of irony in Brutus’s speech is in the lines “Who is here so vile that will not/ love his country? If any, speak—for him have I/ offended” (III, ii, 34-36). By using irony, Brutus is saying that if the plebes don't agree with him, they're not loyal to their country. However, he really means, if the plebes don't agree with Caesar’s death, they're against him which makes them the enemy in Brutus's eyes. Antony also uses verbal irony in his speech by saying “I am no orator, as Brutus is” (III, ii, 229) and calling Brutus and Cassius honorable men. All of this is ironic, because he is playing with the the audience's emotions because what Brutus and Cassius has done is not honorable according to Antony. Both Brutus and Antony use irony in their speeches to convince the audience of their beliefs but Brutus used it as a threat to make them fear being his enemy while Antony used iony to make the people emotional because of their love to Caesar. Another way in which Antony used to deliver a persuasive speech at Caesar’s funeral is anaphora or repetition. Throughout his speech, Antony repeats the fact that Brutus and the other conspirators are honorable men by saying, “For Brutus is an honorable man;/ So are they all, all honorable men” (III, ii, 91-92). By repeating this quote, Antony is telling that he is not trying to prove the conspirators wrong but he then goes on to question how ambitious Caesar really was. He says, “the noble Brutus/ hath
…show more content…
When Brutus says “not that I loved Caesar less, but that i loved/ Rome more” (III, ii, 23-24), he is using pathos to appeal to the Plebeians through their love and loyalty to Rome, which can make them betray anyone, even Caesar, whom they loved. Brutus also uses rhetorical questions to address the audience including ”Had you rather Caesar were living, and/ die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all/ freemen” (III, ii, 24-26). This rhetorical question is used to make the Plebeians think about what is better for their life by making them choose between being free without Caesar or slaves with Caesar. Lastly, Antony uses verse format in his speech while Brutus uses prose, which make it easier to appeal to the masses by speaking the ordinary form of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Brutus gives his antithesis to claim his innocence and reasoning for the murder of Caesar by saying, “not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more,” Julius Caesar (3.2. 21-22). Brutus presents this antithesis to draw an ethical and emotional response from the crowd because of the contrast between loving Caesar less and loving Rome more. The strength of this is that it creates a parallelism of words that are a juxtaposition of each other. It causes the plebeians to see and emphasize the distinctions of the ideas that they might of looked over. Making them see, or think, that Brutus was really putting his honor on the line, just for the good of Rome.…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In his speech, Marc Antony argues that Brutus' statement that Caesar was ambitious is wrong, while Brutus argues that Caesar was ambitious and power-hungry. Marc Antony appeals to the pulpit by using a past occurrence to give them a reason and an example as to why they should believe him. "When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept:/ Ambition should be made of sterner stuff:" (19-20 IIIii). Marc Antony uses this point to get the crowd to understand that Caesar was too emotional and had too big a heart to be considered ambitious. Caesar loved Rome and the people living there so much, that he would have never tried to put any of them in harm's way for the sake of gaining power.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was an effective part of Brutus’s speech however, Antony’s emotion will effect the people more. In contrast to Brutus, Antony used a lot of emotional appeals towards the Romans. In one way, Antony points out the people that before Brutus killed Caesar they didn’t have any problems with Caesar’s ways of ruling. The Romans “all did love him once” because Caesar did no wrong to the people…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Grecian Appeals in a Roman State When thinking of famous oration, one example comes to the forefront. The speech given by Marc Antony to mourn Caesar in Shakespeare’s work Julius Caesar has been referenced for ages as an example of a convincing argument. Everyone recalls the opening line of, “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears.” and all know what follows the speech – war leading to the establishment of the final triumvirate. (Shakespeare 3.2.82)…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first speech we hear is Brutus'. In his speech, he justifies why he killed Julius Caesar, and to also gain the backing of the other Romans. A hyperbole is used in Antony's speech, "When the poor hath cried, Caesar had wept." Caesar didn't actually cry, but he was very upset. This shows that Caesar wasn't as bad as he seemed.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Brutus recites a speech in the market place after Caesar’s death the speeches exemplify parallelism, verbal irony, and witty use of rhetoric. With the Roman public watching on eager to see a reprisal for the death of Caesar, Brutus uses the undetected technique of coercion on the Romans taking advantage of their easily susceptible minds. In his speech he proclaims his love for Caesar passionately stating “If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar’s, to him I say that Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less than his”. With the public making up their minds, Brutus plays his pathos card, showing he really did care for Caesar but claims, “Have you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” .Here…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus said he loved Caesar but he loved his country more and challenged the citizens to the question whether their love for Rome is as great and guaranteed that Caesar would become a tyrant. ”Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more”(III,ii,41-43.) Antony cried in the middle of his speech and said he would rather be dead with Caesar than alive and that the people were not guaranteed that Caesar would become a tyrant. Both Brutus and Antony told the people of Rome to trust them and for a short amount of time they did trust Brutus but, Antony won out in the…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus is a stoic man and he's also Caesar's best friend. Brutus thinks Caesar is ambitious so he slews him for Rome. He approaches the Romans with mob mentality because he doesn't want them to think that he killed Caesar for the throne. He did this because he values reason above emotion although, when he says, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more," Brutus is showing us a comparison between his love of Caesar and his love of Rome by using these opposite words, less and more, What rhetorical appeals does the speaker use? He is using what is called "Antithesis" and "Epimone."…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The first thing I realized when Brutus was giving his speech was that he was intent on making everyone believe that if Caesar was still alive they would all remain and die slaves as said from the play, "Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves,". I think his speech was to make the people believe that killing Caesar was the right thing to do and by saying how much he loved Caesar would make the people think that it was the right thing to do. When Mark Antony gave his speech you could tell he was very upset when the plebeians started commenting on how red his eyes were, he convinced the people that what Brutus did was wrong while at the same time seeming like he was okay with it. Brutus's speech made all of the plebeians think Caesar wasn't a great ruler by saying he was too ambitious, " But, as he was ambitious, I slew him".…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Brutus’ funeral speech he conveys a tone such as calm and reassuring. Brutus is trying to clam down the people of Rome as he begins to talk about caesar and continues to reassure the crowd of his love for Caesar. Brutus uses dramatic pauses, either or fallacy, and anaphora to show his audience that he is honest when he says what has happened is for the best. However in Antonys speech is more sympathetic and he uses loaded words, epimone, and metaphors to create a melancholy or somber tone when talking about Caesar. Brutus’ funeral speech was written in prose form and this allows him to express that Caesar’s leadership and power would eventually have turned into a dictatorship.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dramatic pause, antithesis, loaded words, and parallelism are all used in order to emphasize this tone. Antithesis is used when he explains to the commoners of Rome that if “Caesar were living [they would] all die slaves [but if] Caesar were dead [they would] live as freeman” (Shakespeare 42). The audience can put a mental note in their heads about what would have happened if Caesar had become king and he were not killed, this is going to induce the citizens that they are safe now. He uses either or fallacy to make the commoners feel like a weight has been lifted off of their chests which makes the tone in this part of the speech uplifting. Having an uplifting tone will help Brutus because the people of Rome will want to be on his side and feel better about themselves rather than having a dark and gloomy tone where the people will feel…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Speeches play a vital part in the plot developments of Julius Caesar. The plebeians are easily influenced into incredibly opposing perspectives through Brutus' and Antony's speeches. Antony's incredible control of the group causes insurgency in the streets of Rome and creates the support for a mission to vindicate Caesar's death. Also, Brutus is reluctant at first to join the scheme against Caesar, however in the wake of talking with the exceedingly manipulative Cassius, Brutus is more persuaded.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each character desperately fights to persuade and manipulate the audience and to do so, they each deploy their best tactics. Brutus utilizes his intellect and trust of the people to present a logical argument as to why he must be responsible for bringing structure back to Rome. Antony on the other hand uses his charisma and knowledge of what really motivates the people to form an emotionally charged discussion that places emphasis on the audience drawing their own conclusions. He does so by carefully guiding the crowd through the use of rhetoric questions and sarcastic tones so they unknowingly reach the very conclusion he wants them to make. This ultimately leads to Antony achieving victory over his competitor and leaving the overconfident Brutus fleeing for his life on the outskirts of…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays