Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

Improved Essays
Loyalty is defined as a devotion to a person, country, group, or cause. Loyalties can conflict with each other and one would have to choose, but could that justify killing a person? In Shakespeare Julius Caesar, Brutus, Caesar’s best friend joined Cassius and other conspirators to kill Caesar justifying it by their loyalty to their country, Rome. They believed that Caesar is getting too powerful and his power is going to his head and will damage the republic. At Caesar’s funeral, both Brutus and Antony, Caesar’s noble friend give speeches that included different strategies to affect the audience’s feelings and thoughts. Antony delivered a more effective speech than Brutus by using many rhetorical devices including irony, pathos, . By making his speech emotional and manipulative, Antony convinces the people of Rome to avenge Caesar's death with him.
In their speeches, both Brutus and Antony use irony to appeal to the people’s emotions and convince them of different beliefs. One example of irony in Brutus’s speech is in the lines “Who is here so vile
…show more content…
When Brutus says “not that I loved Caesar less, but that i loved/ Rome more” (III, ii, 23-24), he is using pathos to appeal to the Plebeians through their love and loyalty to Rome, which can make them betray anyone, even Caesar, whom they loved. Brutus also uses rhetorical questions to address the audience including ”Had you rather Caesar were living, and/ die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all/ freemen” (III, ii, 24-26). This rhetorical question is used to make the Plebeians think about what is better for their life by making them choose between being free without Caesar or slaves with Caesar. Lastly, Antony uses verse format in his speech while Brutus uses prose, which make it easier to appeal to the masses by speaking the ordinary form of the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus is a stoic man and he's also Caesar's best friend. Brutus thinks Caesar is ambitious so he slews him for Rome. He approaches the Romans with mob mentality because he doesn't want them to think that he killed Caesar for the throne. He did this because he values reason above emotion although, when he says, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more," Brutus is showing us a comparison between his love of Caesar and his love of Rome by using these opposite words, less and more, What rhetorical appeals does the speaker use? He is using what is called "Antithesis" and "Epimone."…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In his speech, Marc Antony argues that Brutus' statement that Caesar was ambitious is wrong, while Brutus argues that Caesar was ambitious and power-hungry. Marc Antony appeals to the pulpit by using a past occurrence to give them a reason and an example as to why they should believe him. "When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept:/ Ambition should be made of sterner stuff:" (19-20 IIIii). Marc Antony uses this point to get the crowd to understand that Caesar was too emotional and had too big a heart to be considered ambitious. Caesar loved Rome and the people living there so much, that he would have never tried to put any of them in harm's way for the sake of gaining power.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony uses pathos to invoke the people emotionally to gain back their loyalty, when Brutus describes Caesar as a tyrant. Antony appealed to the people emotionally and logically by stating the facts about Caesar and what he did. Antony uses parallelism in his speech about Brutus by saying “Brutus is an honourable man” this would be repeated because this was sarcasm because Brutus isn’t an honourable man. Antony ultimately manipulated the Roman people and got them to do what he wanted in the end by appealing to logos, pathos and…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare. The characters Antony and Cassius are shielded by their appearance on the outside; innocent and bringing justice to Rome. Thus, these false outward showings enable these morally compromised men to use their manipulative rhetoric that unleashes chaos upon their city that,furthermore causes Brutus,a naive man, to create a coordinated plan to kill Caesar a man he was loyal to, because of Cassius's use of rhetoric and leads to uproar and chaotic acts done by the people of Rome because of Antony’s use of rhetoric during a speech. After Cassius in a speech had proclaimed to his friend Brutus. That they are being undermined by Caesar and slowly but surely are giving him the power to destroy…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first speech we hear is Brutus'. In his speech, he justifies why he killed Julius Caesar, and to also gain the backing of the other Romans. A hyperbole is used in Antony's speech, "When the poor hath cried, Caesar had wept." Caesar didn't actually cry, but he was very upset. This shows that Caesar wasn't as bad as he seemed.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why was Antony’s speech better that Brutus’s? Antony’s speech was better because it focused more on Emotion (Pathos) which is more appealing to human nature, rather than Brutus’s appeal to logic (Logos) and trust (Ethos). Even though they both use rhetoric there is a lot of differences and similarities in their speeches. Still one triumphs over the other and persuades the Roman people to riot and plot against the Conspirators. Brutus allowed this to happen by leaving and allowing Antony to speak unopposed at Caesar's funeral.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Brutus’ funeral speech he conveys a tone such as calm and reassuring. Brutus is trying to clam down the people of Rome as he begins to talk about caesar and continues to reassure the crowd of his love for Caesar. Brutus uses dramatic pauses, either or fallacy, and anaphora to show his audience that he is honest when he says what has happened is for the best. However in Antonys speech is more sympathetic and he uses loaded words, epimone, and metaphors to create a melancholy or somber tone when talking about Caesar. Brutus’ funeral speech was written in prose form and this allows him to express that Caesar’s leadership and power would eventually have turned into a dictatorship.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Brutus and Mark Antony were both friends or allies of Caesar. They both spoke at his funeral and while both speech's were similar they had their differences. Brutus' speech on one hand, was driven by logic and reason. While Antony's speech was driven by emotions and to make the crowd feel something and sympathize with him. Brutus' intention was to persuade the audience that the killing of Caesar was a necessary thing while Antony was trying to cause riot among the people and show them how unfortunate Caesar's death was.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The first thing I realized when Brutus was giving his speech was that he was intent on making everyone believe that if Caesar was still alive they would all remain and die slaves as said from the play, "Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves,". I think his speech was to make the people believe that killing Caesar was the right thing to do and by saying how much he loved Caesar would make the people think that it was the right thing to do. When Mark Antony gave his speech you could tell he was very upset when the plebeians started commenting on how red his eyes were, he convinced the people that what Brutus did was wrong while at the same time seeming like he was okay with it. Brutus's speech made all of the plebeians think Caesar wasn't a great ruler by saying he was too ambitious, " But, as he was ambitious, I slew him".…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The quote: “Romans, countrymen, and lovers!” 3.2.14-16. Brutus is demonstrating that he is one of them. This helps establish credibility, Brutus tries to defend his thought on killing Caesar to protect the people of Rome by appealing to the sense of Roman values. Although they both start their speeches out the exact same way, Antony once again was the most persuasive character in the particular mode of persuasion, because if the audience continues to read the speech they will start to notice that he is gaining authority over the people of Rome in a good way.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each character desperately fights to persuade and manipulate the audience and to do so, they each deploy their best tactics. Brutus utilizes his intellect and trust of the people to present a logical argument as to why he must be responsible for bringing structure back to Rome. Antony on the other hand uses his charisma and knowledge of what really motivates the people to form an emotionally charged discussion that places emphasis on the audience drawing their own conclusions. He does so by carefully guiding the crowd through the use of rhetoric questions and sarcastic tones so they unknowingly reach the very conclusion he wants them to make. This ultimately leads to Antony achieving victory over his competitor and leaving the overconfident Brutus fleeing for his life on the outskirts of…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Brutus and Antony have a persuasive tone during their speeches as Brutus uses his credibility and some reasoning while Antony uses actual evidence and fiery emotion. Although Brutus has a strong speech and wins the crowd over, Antony is able to win them back through his power using his oratory…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Speeches play a vital part in the plot developments of Julius Caesar. The plebeians are easily influenced into incredibly opposing perspectives through Brutus' and Antony's speeches. Antony's incredible control of the group causes insurgency in the streets of Rome and creates the support for a mission to vindicate Caesar's death. Also, Brutus is reluctant at first to join the scheme against Caesar, however in the wake of talking with the exceedingly manipulative Cassius, Brutus is more persuaded.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays