The Political Gladiators In Shakespeare's Julies Caesar

Improved Essays
The Political Gladiators of Rome Civilizations throughout the world’s existence have worshiped the idea of men fighting one another, each clinging desperately for the slight chance of the most intense desire, victory. Rome is no exception. While Rome is famous for its competition amongst gladiators, it is also known for its competition amongst its political leaders. In the play, Julies Caesar, Shakespeare creates an intense scene that depicts one of the most important competitions in Rome’s history, the fight between Brutus and Antony. With Rome’s glorified leader, Caesar, suddenly killed, the new power void draws Brutus and Antony into a clash for the ages. Their speeches given at Caesar’s funeral show how the two characters were fighting one another for power over Rome not with swords and spears, but with words and form. While Brutus creates an intellectual and logical speech to win over the minds of he crowd, Antony chooses to develop an emotional speech to win over the hearts of the crowd. The result of the competition is astonishing. In a war of …show more content…
Each character desperately fights to persuade and manipulate the audience and to do so, they each deploy their best tactics. Brutus utilizes his intellect and trust of the people to present a logical argument as to why he must be responsible for bringing structure back to Rome. Antony on the other hand uses his charisma and knowledge of what really motivates the people to form an emotionally charged discussion that places emphasis on the audience drawing their own conclusions. He does so by carefully guiding the crowd through the use of rhetoric questions and sarcastic tones so they unknowingly reach the very conclusion he wants them to make. This ultimately leads to Antony achieving victory over his competitor and leaving the overconfident Brutus fleeing for his life on the outskirts of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    William Bernbach once said, “Persuasion is not a science but an art.” In the shakespearian play Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony Speaks to the People of Rome about Caesar’s death. Brutus makes a great speech, but Antony is the one who wins over the crowd. Let’s compare and contrast both sides of the two speeches. The strategy Logos, Ethos, Pathos, and Karos was used in both speeches and each speech used it differently.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Tragedy of Julius Caesar: Persuasion There's always two sides of the story when it comes to an argument. Brutus tries to explain to the crowd that Caesar was ambitious and is not fit to rule Rome. Antony tries to turn the crowd Brutus. Brutus and Antony used effective persuasive techniques in their speeches from the Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Brutus used two persuasive techniques that are striking to convince the crowd that Caesar was ambitious.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each included example of logos, ethos, and pathos in his speech. However, one crucial mistake that Brutus made when speaking is letting Antony speak after him. He cannot counter what Antony says, and does not know what he tells the people. Because of the way Antony spoke and what he included in his speech, he is able to come out on top. The people are able to relate to the emotion that is pouring out of Antony, whereas they merely listened to the facts that Brutus spoke to them.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the play, Julius Caesar, everyone sees Antony as a noble man. He speaks at Caesar’s funeral for the “sake” of Brutus, who the crowd refers to as honorable and sincere. By associating himself with Brutus, Antony gains authority. He skillfully persuades a crowd that loves Brutus, that Caesar wasn't ambitious and that Brutus isn’t honorable. By using verbal irony, an anecdote, and imagery which appeals to the audience's emotions, Antony persuades the crowd that Caesar’s death was not reasonable.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony delivered a more effective speech than Brutus by using many rhetorical devices including irony, pathos, . By making his speech emotional and manipulative, Antony convinces the people of Rome to avenge Caesar's death with him. In their speeches, both Brutus and Antony use irony to appeal to the people’s emotions and convince them of different beliefs. One example of irony in Brutus’s speech is in the lines “Who is here so vile…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This grows his credibility in the eyes of the people and the people begin to put their faith in him and his point of view. Antony also says in his speech, “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.” Through this simple statement he is proving to the simple people in the audience that his character is not one that would mess with their minds, or try to convince them of something they don’t already believe him. Now whether these statements are his true character or not is irrelevant. The audience believes his intentions and choses to follow his ideas rather than the ideas of Brutus, making him the more effective speaker in this…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Concluding his speech, Antony finally gets a rise from the others which means trouble for those who had murdered Caesar. Brutus gave his reasoning at first, and he had the crowd on his side, but that quickly changed once Antony spoke. Antony had a better usage of rhetoric in his words, therefore the crowd sided with…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Brutus recites a speech in the market place after Caesar’s death the speeches exemplify parallelism, verbal irony, and witty use of rhetoric. With the Roman public watching on eager to see a reprisal for the death of Caesar, Brutus uses the undetected technique of coercion on the Romans taking advantage of their easily susceptible minds. In his speech he proclaims his love for Caesar passionately stating “If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar’s, to him I say that Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less than his”. With the public making up their minds, Brutus plays his pathos card, showing he really did care for Caesar but claims, “Have you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” .Here…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Shakespeare is regarded as the greatest writer in the English language. He is well-known for many of his works such as Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, etc. Along with these works is “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”. In “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”, Shakespeare writes two very well known speeches that are delivered by the characters Brutus and Mark Antony during the funeral of Julius Caesar. In speeches, Shakespeare uses ethos, pathos and logos on behalf of Mark Antony and Brutus to persuade the citizens of their own beliefs.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony had the herculean task of turning the Roman population against Brutus and the other conspirators. To do this, Antony needed to follow up Brutus ' powerful oration with a short, supervised speech. Still, in little time Antony had turned the tides and had the Plebeians on his side. He had used certain devices in his speech, several of which include equalization, repetition, emotion, humility, irony, inflation, and anticipation, to aid in his success. Antony 's strategies worked like a charm, and even before his funeral oration had finished he and the conspirators all knew who had the upper hand.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether public speeches result from those such as Adolf Hitler or Martin Luther King, Jr., their remarkable ability to ignite the population persuades people to take up arms regardless of the cause. In the midst of Act III in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both speak to the bewildered citizenry regarding Caesar’s demise. Resulting from a handful of conspirators assassinating him in the Senate, Caesar’s death sparks chaos which demands explanation. Thus, some individuals assert Brutus’ speech over Antony’s by claiming that Brutus’ effect and ability to direct his point sooner propel him higher than Antony. Unfortunately, this argument fails to acknowledge Antony’s mightier impact on the audience and his employment of a larger…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Brutus addresses the crowd with logic and reason, Antony uses emotion. The use of rhetorical questions, parallel structure, and repetition by Brutus and Antony throughout their speeches changes the views of the crowd and what they should believe. While…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After my speech is ended.” (AIII,S 1 L, 255) Speaking at the funeral, Antony goes against the rules that Brutus sets and makes the crowd go against…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, there are two speeches regarding the same topic that are presented to the public. Both Mark Antony and Brutus delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar, consisting of their opinion and explanation of what has happened and why, for the needs of the Roman people. Both of the speeches have a very distinct and different purpose, and appealed to different mental senses of the crowd (Ethos, Logos, and Pathos). As Mark Antony 's words were favored and followed, riots broke out and Rome was indescribably angry and upset upon the tragedy of Julius Caesar. This event foreshadowed the conclusion of the story, and set the scene for the following conflicts that reeked havoc upon Rome…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays