Julius Caesar Rhetoric Analysis

Improved Essays
Opinions have been influenced and controlled by rhetoric throughout history, and they continue to be today. Those who speak with rhetoric when trying to persuade someone, tend to manipulate the opposing opinion effortlessly, rather than being concise and bumptious. In the play, The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar, the author, William Shakespeare avows influential rhetoric; whether convincing many of an opinion, begging a loved one to remain home, or a sardonic cobbler addressing himself. Within numerous of scenes from The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare establishes how cogent rhetoric is. Significant amounts of people are easily influenced by others they are close to, especially when they are praised by these loved ones. In ACT I, …show more content…
Antony uses rhetoric when using his poison-like words in favor of himself, and against those who betrayed Caesar. When giving his speech, he begins by announcing “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him./” by starting like this, he grabs the emotional appeal of the audience by showing his gratitude and love for his dead friend (3.2. 83). Antony continues to address the wrong that was done upon Caesar and he finishes a part with “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar,/” showing his remorse, “And I must pause till it come back to me./” Antony begins to weep and pauses for a moment (3.2. 115, 116.) As he pauses in the middle of his words, a plebeian speaks up from the crowd, “Methinks there is much reason in his sayings./” as the citizen says this, it shows the effect that the little amount of Antony’s words have already impacted on the crowd (3.2. 17). Antony continues to lace his words with rhetoric, the naive Romans quickly change both their perspective and opinion about the entire situation abruptly. Concluding his speech, Antony finally gets a rise from the others which means trouble for those who had murdered Caesar. Brutus gave his reasoning at first, and he had the crowd on his side, but that quickly changed once Antony spoke. Antony had a better usage of rhetoric in his words, therefore the crowd sided with

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s funeral speech about Caesar in Act Three demonstrates his own use of rhetoric irony with the help of Ethos, Pathos, and Logos. To begin with, the conspirators and people of Rome could have delivered the message that resulted in his speech. Since the conspirators killed Caesar, Antony got the message that he should strike back. In Antony’s speech, his overall motive was pointing out the ambitions of the conspirators, not Caesar, achieving his goal of rousing the plebeians to riot and civil war. His strong use of ethos…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech ultimately leads to a battle between him and the conspirators. Brutus has good intentions, but nevertheless he makes a lot of bad decisions which eventually leads to his…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabbed, And as he plucked his cursed steel away, Mark how the blood of Caesar followed it” (A3S2, line 188-190). Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, is about a man who going to be crowned king of Rome and who was loved by all. Brutus and Antony were both effective in trying to win the audiences favor however, Antony used more pathos to connect with the audience’s emotions and Brutus used more of a logos appeal. For example, when Antony read from Caesar’s will about where the money for Rome was supposed to get, he said “ But here’s a parchment with the eal of Caesar (A3S2, L140 P125)”. This was an example of logos because he used a document to present his argument.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Brutus uses rhetorical questions to get the pulpit to agree that if Caesar were still alive, he would be a tyrant. Mark Antony uses a fact to get the audience to agree with him. " He hath brought many captives home to Rome/ Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill:/ Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?" (16-18 IIIii).…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony had the herculean task of turning the Roman population against Brutus and the other conspirators. To do this, Antony needed to follow up Brutus ' powerful oration with a short, supervised speech. Still, in little time Antony had turned the tides and had the Plebeians on his side. He had used certain devices in his speech, several of which include equalization, repetition, emotion, humility, irony, inflation, and anticipation, to aid in his success. Antony 's strategies worked like a charm, and even before his funeral oration had finished he and the conspirators all knew who had the upper hand.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “An enemy can partly ruin a man, but it takes a good-natured injudicious friend to complete the thing and make it perfect.” It takes time to learn to trust someone just to leave it all behind. Julius Caesar had learned to trust Brutus. He was a noble friend to Caesar until he didn’t know if he cared more about Rome or friendship. Cassius decided to “help” Brutus with his decision.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a sarcastic tone, Antony repeatedly referred to these "honourable men". Repeating "Honourable men" is also seen to be ironic, he's ridiculing Brutus and the conspirators saying his idea of Caesar being so ambitious, he's a threat, is something to laugh about. Every time Antony cleverly pauses in his speech to let the plebeians comment, the plebeians are more spiteful toward the conspirators. As the crowd begins to favour Antony the citizens make comments like "Methinks there is much reason in his saying" which shows there change in opinion. Antony said his speech, after Brutus so Antony could adapt to what Brutus has already said and even prove it wrong.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately, some individuals affirm Marc Antony’s employment of ethos and pathos as brainwashing his audience to follow his will without personal thought. These individuals, however, overlook the idea that Marc Antony surfaces the people’s own thoughts on the morality of the assassination. For example, Antony commences his eulogy by addressing the audience and asking them to “lend [him their] ears; / [He comes] to bury Caesar, not to praise him” (III. ii. 73-74).…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although people generally believe they are persuaded by ideas that they have discovered, William Shakespeare’s historic tragedy, Julius Caesar illustrates that an individual’s thoughts are inevitably shaped by external factors. Persuasion and suggestion are rhetorical skills that play central roles in Julius Caesar, but they also demonstrates how individuals bend towards words they want to hear when faced with a difficult situation. The play cautions the dangers and powers of rhetoric as a tool for manipulation and reminds us how easily and completely an audience can be both won and lost in terms of persuasion. In the few early scenes we are able to see Cassius promoting his own views upon Brutus.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Brutus addresses the crowd with logic and reason, Antony uses emotion. The use of rhetorical questions, parallel structure, and repetition by Brutus and Antony throughout their speeches changes the views of the crowd and what they should believe. While…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasion is the act of urging someone to do something. Some people may try to persuade others by being subtle and trying to make them do or believe something without them knowing whereas others will get straight to the point. There are innumerable different types or forms of persuasion. In the book Julius Caesar, Brutus and the conspirers assassinate Caesar in the attempt to save Rome. Brutus speaks at his funeral to try to persuade the commoners that what he did was appropriate.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony’s Appeal to the Roman People: A Deceitful Discussion Aristotle, an ancient Greek philosopher, once said that “Rhetoric may be defined as the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion.” In Act III Scene II of the tragic play Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony uses much rhetoric and persuasion in order to convince the Plebeians to rebel against Brutus. This speech followed shortly after Caesar's assassination by the conspirators and Brutus’s speech about why Caesar’s assassination was obligatory.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Speech Analysis

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After Caesar’s death, in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the conspirators and Mark Antony speak to the public to explain what has happened to Caesar. Brutus, one of the main conspirators and Caesar’s best friend, talks first and gives the Romans the reason as to why Caesar had to be killed. Brutus’ speech is very convincing and he manipulates the crowd into believing him easily. After Brutus speaks, Mark Antony, Caesar’s good friend and second in command, gives a speech about Caesar and how he did not deserve to die, easily turning the crowd against Brutus and the other conspirators. Both speeches use persuasive techniques, like ethos, and rhetorical devices, like repetition and rhetorical questions, to manipulate their audiences…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays