Persuasion In Mark Antony's Speech

Improved Essays
Mark Antony’s Appeal to the Roman People: A Deceitful Discussion Aristotle, an ancient Greek philosopher, once said that “Rhetoric may be defined as the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion.” In Act III Scene II of the tragic play Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony uses much rhetoric and persuasion in order to convince the Plebeians to rebel against Brutus. This speech followed shortly after Caesar's assassination by the conspirators and Brutus’s speech about why Caesar’s assassination was obligatory. Antony had previously agreed with the conspirators to not speak harshly about them assassinating Caesar. Antony then makes a speech, trying to uproar the Roman population into rebelling.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech was based on the use of pathos. He mentioned the will of Caesar but then told the people, “It is not meet you know how Caesar loved you” (Anderson 840). The people did not realize that he was manipulating them into demanding to hear the will. His speech was filled with emotional appeals and veiled calls to action such as this. At one point in his speech, he crooned, “Good friends, sweet friends, let me not stir you up to such a sudden flood of mutiny” (Anderson 838).…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony fosters a strong sense of emotion in his compelling speech at Julius Caesar’s funeral to the Roman people in Act III, scene ii, lines 74-147. Antony prefaces the deliverance of his speech by calling Brutus and Cassius’ honorability into consideration, but ultimately criticizes them and ignites a fire of rage within the citizens of Rome. This scene occurs shortly after the assassination of Caesar. At this point, the Roman people hold the conspirators in high regard as the narrative of the execution is characterized as being for the benefit of the city. Throughout Antony’s speech, however, public opinion shifts dramatically against the conspirators.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The historical play, “Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare illustrates the problems of leadership that commence after the assassination of the Roman dictator, Julius Caesar. The play has a thorough use of rhetorical devices and was a powerful persuasion tool during the whole of the show. This literary device is extensively used during the funeral scene in Act three, Scene two where Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony give their speeches about Caesar's death. In their funeral speeches, while Marcus Brutus delivered a logical speech, Mark Antony overall wins the crowd through his use of ethics and empathy. Antony’s speech left such a lasting impact due his skillful use of Pathos.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When asked the question “Does manipulation matter?” people would agree that “Yes, in most cases it is absolutely necessary to manipulate to get your point across.” Well, when told the statement “ Governor *n/a* told his people he would *n/a* yet he is finishing off his last year in office, and it still hasn’t happened today,” the people would act as if it was a terrible thing and be in complete shock. When combining the question and the statement, you end up with “Is it necessary in some cases of politics to use manipulation tactics” you get a shrug of answers. Some people would say “No, they’re leaders.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although people generally believe they are persuaded by ideas that they have discovered, William Shakespeare’s historic tragedy, Julius Caesar illustrates that an individual’s thoughts are inevitably shaped by external factors. Persuasion and suggestion are rhetorical skills that play central roles in Julius Caesar, but they also demonstrates how individuals bend towards words they want to hear when faced with a difficult situation. The play cautions the dangers and powers of rhetoric as a tool for manipulation and reminds us how easily and completely an audience can be both won and lost in terms of persuasion. In the few early scenes we are able to see Cassius promoting his own views upon Brutus.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To explain, Antony finally returned to the topic of the will. The only reason he got off the topic was so that he had time to talk about the conspirators in a negative way. This quote shows how in the next couple lines, Antony will read Caesar’s will to the crowd, saying that they have gained seventy five drachmas and Caesar’s private arbors. The persuasive technique of Pathos was used here as well because this shows that Caesar considered the people of Rome family, which made them very emotional and excited because being family with Caesar meant so much to them. By showing the common people of Rome Caesar’s will, Antony created a whirlwind of emotions throughout the…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a sarcastic tone, Antony repeatedly referred to these "honourable men". Repeating "Honourable men" is also seen to be ironic, he's ridiculing Brutus and the conspirators saying his idea of Caesar being so ambitious, he's a threat, is something to laugh about. Every time Antony cleverly pauses in his speech to let the plebeians comment, the plebeians are more spiteful toward the conspirators. As the crowd begins to favour Antony the citizens make comments like "Methinks there is much reason in his saying" which shows there change in opinion. Antony said his speech, after Brutus so Antony could adapt to what Brutus has already said and even prove it wrong.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Knowing he had to sway the crowd to believe his opinion, Antony had to discreetly show the crowd that conspirators were not heroes, but murderers. Using different forms of persuasion, Antony was able to achieve his goal of turing the sympathy to people now had for Brutus, over the Caesar once again. In order to persuade the people to not have sympathy for the Conspirators, Antony showed them Caesar’s will, repetitively said the word “honorable”, and showed them Caesar’s…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony had the herculean task of turning the Roman population against Brutus and the other conspirators. To do this, Antony needed to follow up Brutus ' powerful oration with a short, supervised speech. Still, in little time Antony had turned the tides and had the Plebeians on his side. He had used certain devices in his speech, several of which include equalization, repetition, emotion, humility, irony, inflation, and anticipation, to aid in his success. Antony 's strategies worked like a charm, and even before his funeral oration had finished he and the conspirators all knew who had the upper hand.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony was able to convince the crowd to do what he wanted by conjuring their emotions. He was also able to gain power over the plebeians because they were followers. In addition, Antony’s speech was successful because he made the crowd feel pity as well as guilt for betraying Caesar. Furthermore, it made them feel anger towards the conspirators for killing Caesar and sympathy for Antony because he showed his emotions. Antony’s speech is one for many generations to uses as a model for persuasive speaking, as it uses genuine emotions to persuade the…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rylee Sellitto Ms. Heaton RL 1 English 10 November 4th, 2015 Effectiveness From Logical and Emotional Appeal Have you ever noticed the differences between two speeches by listening to how each persuades the audience with their words? In the tragedy Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar gets stabbed in the back by the conspirators and dies. After his death, both Brutus and Antony give a speech to the people of Rome, expressing their logic and emotion behind Caesar’s assassination. Antony’s use of logical and emotional appeals swayed the Romans and proved his speech more effective than Brutus’s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony states his direct purpose and asks for his audience’s attention outright, thus creating mutual respect through ethos by addressing his peers as equals. In addition, Antony appeals to the crowd’s emotions by mentioning Caesar’s will and how every citizen lies within in lines 132 and 133 of scene 2 in Act III. This employment of pathos riles up the audience and influences them to join his side, yet it also creates a leash with which Antony ties to the crowd to fulfill his agenda. Continuing, Antony leaves nothing to chance or opinion by focusing on the fact that he has no business in disproving Brutus’ words, but only to speak what he knows (III. ii. 100-101). Antony manipulates ethos in this instance to protect his integrity by addressing that his goal does not lie within feuding with another.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Speech Analysis

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After Caesar’s death, in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the conspirators and Mark Antony speak to the public to explain what has happened to Caesar. Brutus, one of the main conspirators and Caesar’s best friend, talks first and gives the Romans the reason as to why Caesar had to be killed. Brutus’ speech is very convincing and he manipulates the crowd into believing him easily. After Brutus speaks, Mark Antony, Caesar’s good friend and second in command, gives a speech about Caesar and how he did not deserve to die, easily turning the crowd against Brutus and the other conspirators. Both speeches use persuasive techniques, like ethos, and rhetorical devices, like repetition and rhetorical questions, to manipulate their audiences…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays