Rhetorical Analysis Of Brutus's Speech In Julius Caesar

Superior Essays
Register to read the introduction… He reminded the people that Caesar would have ruined Rome, become a tyrant and would have enslaved everyone, he said "had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead?". He says this as a rhetorical question: it has quite an obvious answer but probably would have been false anyway. Brutus says that last quote like it is fact and that it will happen. The fact makes it seem more real. Another example of a rhetorical question in Brutus's speech is when Brutus says "Who is here so vile that will not love his country?" In that last quote notice he started with "Who is here" He say that many times in the speech which is repetition for impact, he uses this to persuade the crowd. That device works as a list to make it seem like there were many reasons for the assassination and he keeps reinforcing his opinions with repetition. Brutus also explained that he didn't hate Caesar, but that he loved Rome more. He says "Not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more" this shows it would have been hard to kill Caesar, as he loved him, but he is so sure it is right he had to killed him. At one point, they wanted to crown Brutus, who intended for everyone to be …show more content…
In a sarcastic tone, Antony repeatedly referred to these "honourable men". Repeating "Honourable men" is also seen to be ironic, he's ridiculing Brutus and the conspirators saying his idea of Caesar being so ambitious, he's a threat, is something to laugh about.
Every time Antony cleverly pauses in his speech to let the plebeians comment, the plebeians are more spiteful toward the conspirators. As the crowd begins to favour Antony the citizens make comments like "Methinks there is much reason in his saying" which shows there change in opinion.
Antony said his speech, after Brutus so Antony could adapt to what Brutus has already said and even prove it wrong. He convinces the crowd that Caesar was great. The crowd would feel guilty about trusting Brutus, after Antony persuaded them he was almost pathetic, this makes the crowd angry and they rebel.
Antony also says "Here was Caesar! When comes such another?" which makes the citizens feel guilty and like they'll never get another Caesar, so they have missed there chance to let Caesar

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    in his funeral speech. With saying this, he is asking the audience who doesn’t love their country enough to make it better. If they did not agree with what Brutus said, it would be believed that they do not truly care for Rome and what would be best for Rome and the people there. By using pathos, Brutus was able to pull on the audience’s emotions to make his speech be more…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Brutus's speech he says, "Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?" (III:ii:22-24) Brutus is hitting their emotions by saying that they would be all slaves if Caesar was still alive and ruling over Rome. This was extremely effective because he knows that none of the commoners would want to live their lives as slaves. Antony says in his speech, "Look, in his place ran Cassius' dagger through.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech ultimately leads to a battle between him and the conspirators. Brutus has good intentions, but nevertheless he makes a lot of bad decisions which eventually leads to his…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He uses a past event as a disclaimer to Brutus' reason for killing Caesar because of his ambition. He then asks the pulpit this question to get them to think about which claim they consider to be true. Brutus uses an emotional question to have the pulpit feel anger towards Caesar's negative ambition. " Had you rather Caesar were living/ and die all slaves," (12-13 IIIii). Brutus uses this question to have the pulpit understand that Caesar needed to be killed or they would all be bending at his every command.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The parallelism of these two opposite statements puts stress of what he is saying. It makes sure that the people know that it wasn’t because he didn’t love Caesar but that he wanted the good of Rome more. Parallelism may have been one of the main devices Brutus used in his speech but its also used in important conjunction with…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Brutus says “not that I loved Caesar less, but that i loved/ Rome more” (III, ii, 23-24), he is using pathos to appeal to the Plebeians through their love and loyalty to Rome, which can make them betray anyone, even Caesar, whom they loved. Brutus also uses rhetorical questions to address the audience including ”Had you rather Caesar were living, and/ die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all/ freemen” (III, ii, 24-26). This rhetorical question is used to make the Plebeians think about what is better for their life by making them choose between being free without Caesar or slaves with Caesar. Lastly, Antony uses verse format in his speech while Brutus uses prose, which make it easier to appeal to the masses by speaking the ordinary form of the…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While justifying his reasons for the speech, that he “[isn’t speaking] to disprove what Brutus spoke” but rather “speaks what he knows,” Antony uses verbal irony. The statement contains irony because he says that he speaks not to disprove Brutus, however he did the opposite by the claims against the Conspirators. Using the irony as bait to draw in the citizens, Antony builds on his tone of manipulation. The irony makes him appear as a good guy, that does not speak out against others, so the people respect him differently. He manipulates them into listening to the rest of the words he must say.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Analyzing Brutus's Speech

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In Brutus’s speech he argues that Rome needs to be silent and listen to what he has say, and that his reasons are to better Rome. He implies that he loved Caesar but he loved Rome more, then he asks whether they would want to live as slaves while Caesar is alive or that he be dead and live all free men, then asks for anyone to speak if he has offended them, and finally Brutus’s purpose is to persuade the citizens of Rome that he will be a great leader in order for them to live as free men. He establishes a serious tone in order to provide the well being for the Roman Empire.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to avenge Caesar, Mark Antony turns a shocked, confused crowd of mourners into an angry mob of rioters by using persuasive techniques. The main component of Antony’s speech, Pathos, appealed to the commoners by striking an emotional spot inside them, trying to turn the fickle crowd against Brutus. Antony displayed the persuasive technique of Pathos by repeating words, showing them Caesar’s body, and presenting Caesar’s will. In the beginning of Antony’s speech, he spoke of Brutus as an honorable man, but in this case he repeated the word, making the connotation of honorable negative.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Scene 2 of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony turned a crowd of mourning citizens to an angry mob. Antony turned this crowd into an angry mob through multiple persuasive devices. Brutus and the other conspirators thought they were killing Caesar for the good of Rome, but Antony and other ideas. He wanted to discreetly show the crowd of Romans who the conspirators actually were to him, a group of murderers. In order to persuade the people to not have sympathy for the Conspirators, Antony showed them Caesar’s will, repetitively said the word “honorable”, and showed them Caesar’s body.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He wanted what was best for Rome to be successful, but he also didn’t want to murder Caesar. Brutus, however, saw through Caesar into the parts that no one else could see. Brutus was saying that he never knew Caesar to let his emotions affect his reasoning. But, when Caesar gets to the top, he scorns the ones who helped him get there.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony had the herculean task of turning the Roman population against Brutus and the other conspirators. To do this, Antony needed to follow up Brutus ' powerful oration with a short, supervised speech. Still, in little time Antony had turned the tides and had the Plebeians on his side. He had used certain devices in his speech, several of which include equalization, repetition, emotion, humility, irony, inflation, and anticipation, to aid in his success. Antony 's strategies worked like a charm, and even before his funeral oration had finished he and the conspirators all knew who had the upper hand.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether public speeches result from those such as Adolf Hitler or Martin Luther King, Jr., their remarkable ability to ignite the population persuades people to take up arms regardless of the cause. In the midst of Act III in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both speak to the bewildered citizenry regarding Caesar’s demise. Resulting from a handful of conspirators assassinating him in the Senate, Caesar’s death sparks chaos which demands explanation. Thus, some individuals assert Brutus’ speech over Antony’s by claiming that Brutus’ effect and ability to direct his point sooner propel him higher than Antony. Unfortunately, this argument fails to acknowledge Antony’s mightier impact on the audience and his employment of a larger…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Speech Analysis

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Which makes it seem like the people in the crowd are participating and forming their own opinions, when Brutus is really forming their thoughts for them knowing that everyone is going to give the same answer. During Mark Antony’s speech he uses the same technique, using repetition and rhetorical questions to prove that Caesar was not ambitious. He states, “He hath brought many captives home to rome,/ Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill./ Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? . . . You all did see that on Lupercal/ I thrice presented him a kingly crown,/ which he did thrice refuse.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays