Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

Improved Essays
Imagine losing a best friend. Imagine never getting to say goodbye to them after witnessing their last breath while being brutally murdered. Imagine having to stand in front of a crowd trying to reason their death with them while trying to comprehend the death itself. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Mark Antony has to fill these dreadful shoes and take the first step in the right direction after witnessing the murder of his closest friend, Julius Caesar. In act three Antony stands in front of the group of Plebians after they have just listened Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar needed to be killed. The crowd originally agrees with Brutus, but once Mark Antony uses his powerful speech devices, the commoners become much more …show more content…
In Act 3 Scene 2, as Brutus talks before the crowd, he defines his reason for killing Caesar due to his ambition, and defines himself as honorable for saving his country. Although Antony is simply expected to weep over Caesar when talking to the people, his powerful words are completely underestimated. Hearing Brutus’ speech gives Antony advantage over the commoners; he shows his ‘support’ for Brutus by repeating his words many, many times. As Caesar is described a faithful friend who never put him in the wrong, Antony makes sure to reiterate his loyalty to Brutus when he states “[b]ut Brutus says he was ambitious, [a]nd Brutus is an honorable man” (Act 3 Scene 2 Lines 86-87). Brutus proceeds to continue his repetition on line 93-94 by once again stating that if Brutus claims Caesar to be ambitious, then he is right because he claims to be honorable. Even as Antony ends his speech, he yet again continues his constant use of the words ‘honorable’ and ‘ambitious.’ Antony’s repetitive uses begin to make the crowd think about why he is repeating them so much. As they think they somehow begin to understand his underlying point; Caesar has no faults whatsoever, Brutus really responsible for the problems in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony, in his eulogy, presented himself as filled with grief and loss; however, a form of subliminal persuasion and manipulation is used to sway the Roman people in his favor. The loyal friend of Caesar appeared to be supportive of the conspirators, but his devotion to the true king never wavered. While he praised the conspirators for being “such honorable men”, Antony admitted how he grieved for his friend. He utilized paralipsis in his cajolery, stating that “I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, / But here I am to speak what I do know.”…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony fosters a strong sense of emotion in his compelling speech at Julius Caesar’s funeral to the Roman people in Act III, scene ii, lines 74-147. Antony prefaces the deliverance of his speech by calling Brutus and Cassius’ honorability into consideration, but ultimately criticizes them and ignites a fire of rage within the citizens of Rome. This scene occurs shortly after the assassination of Caesar. At this point, the Roman people hold the conspirators in high regard as the narrative of the execution is characterized as being for the benefit of the city. Throughout Antony’s speech, however, public opinion shifts dramatically against the conspirators.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech ultimately leads to a battle between him and the conspirators. Brutus has good intentions, but nevertheless he makes a lot of bad decisions which eventually leads to his…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He says, the Noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious, him restating what brutus said made the audience think exactly about Caesar’s actions about what made him “ambitious”. Him saying if Caesar was truly ambitious why did he refuse the crown three times- an ambitious man would’ve accepted the crown with no hesitation. Marc using basic logic to appeal to the townspeople of what the typical ambitious man would do makes the crowd consider if Caesar truly was ambitious or if Brutus was accusing him of being something he wasn’t. Antony says, the evil that men do live after them, that has emotional appeal to the townspeople because it something everyone can relate to, yet he makes it noticed that Caesar was killed for the evils he did. The evils that any citizens could’ve made he was killed for and that shows no fairness to…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is also loyalty that shows how the characters react to Caesar’s death in their speeches at his funeral. Antony’s resting love for Caesar is shown in his speech. At the beginning of the speech he…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar did not deserve his fate. Caesar had earned the love, respect, and loyalty of the Roman people. Caesar was a heroic famous general, social personality, and politician in Rome. In the beginning of the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Caesar was returning to cheering crowds of Romans after a great victory over Pompey. Loyalty is defined as a strong feeling of support or allegiance.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The word honorable is repeated all throughout Antony’s speech which, eventually, changes the thoughts of the crowd. In this case, Pathos is shown because Antony put in the minds of the crowd that Brutus is not one to trust and not honorable, making the fickle crowd angry at Brutus for his actions. In addition, Antony also repeated the word ambitious, in order to defend Caesar. As a matter of fact, Antony states “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Spring Final There are several occurrences that prove the theory that words are more powerful than weapons. In the play Julius Caesar a guy by the name of Marc Antony convinces a whole crowd of people to revolt against their leader. In Germany Hitler did a similar thing, he turned the people to his radical side. They used persuasive speech and gave the people offers that caused them to be loyal to them.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a sarcastic tone, Antony repeatedly referred to these "honourable men". Repeating "Honourable men" is also seen to be ironic, he's ridiculing Brutus and the conspirators saying his idea of Caesar being so ambitious, he's a threat, is something to laugh about. Every time Antony cleverly pauses in his speech to let the plebeians comment, the plebeians are more spiteful toward the conspirators. As the crowd begins to favour Antony the citizens make comments like "Methinks there is much reason in his saying" which shows there change in opinion. Antony said his speech, after Brutus so Antony could adapt to what Brutus has already said and even prove it wrong.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Knowing he had to sway the crowd to believe his opinion, Antony had to discreetly show the crowd that conspirators were not heroes, but murderers. Using different forms of persuasion, Antony was able to achieve his goal of turing the sympathy to people now had for Brutus, over the Caesar once again. In order to persuade the people to not have sympathy for the Conspirators, Antony showed them Caesar’s will, repetitively said the word “honorable”, and showed them Caesar’s…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony had the herculean task of turning the Roman population against Brutus and the other conspirators. To do this, Antony needed to follow up Brutus ' powerful oration with a short, supervised speech. Still, in little time Antony had turned the tides and had the Plebeians on his side. He had used certain devices in his speech, several of which include equalization, repetition, emotion, humility, irony, inflation, and anticipation, to aid in his success. Antony 's strategies worked like a charm, and even before his funeral oration had finished he and the conspirators all knew who had the upper hand.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony states his direct purpose and asks for his audience’s attention outright, thus creating mutual respect through ethos by addressing his peers as equals. In addition, Antony appeals to the crowd’s emotions by mentioning Caesar’s will and how every citizen lies within in lines 132 and 133 of scene 2 in Act III. This employment of pathos riles up the audience and influences them to join his side, yet it also creates a leash with which Antony ties to the crowd to fulfill his agenda. Continuing, Antony leaves nothing to chance or opinion by focusing on the fact that he has no business in disproving Brutus’ words, but only to speak what he knows (III. ii. 100-101). Antony manipulates ethos in this instance to protect his integrity by addressing that his goal does not lie within feuding with another.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony has to slowly plant doubt and anxiety that perhaps Brutus was wrong; that although he is a good and honorable man, Brutus could have just murdered another good man, who was only doing good for Rome. Antony uses his words to manipulate the people’s minds much better than Brutus did. The people know that Antony was Caesar’s good friend and the good things he is saying about Caesar are credible. Since Antony is changing the crowd’s perspective about who Caesar was, his continuous good remarks about Brutus keep them from getting angry and…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Which begs two questions did Caesar have too much ambition? Moreover, what was Caesar so ambitious about? In this essay, I am going to talk about Brutus’ funeral speech and whether it was more effective than Antony’s, what rhetorical appeals did both Brutus and Antony use, and if having too much ambition is a bad thing. In my opinion, Brutus had the better funeral speech he was unequivocal on why he killed Caesar and did not try to make friends with the people that did not accept what he did to help Rome.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays