Julius Caesar Persuasive Essay

Improved Essays
Herding sheep has been an art for thousands years and over time a person can train one of his dogs to do this. In the Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare has used this art and used the people as a herd of sheep, being swayed one side to another. The play takes place in Ancient Rome when Julius Caesar came to power by murdering one of his adversaries Pompey. During this time the people were in rejoice that Julius had killed Pompey, but some were in discouraged about the fact that people have change so easily. Further on in the play a group of conspirators who want to kill Caesar decided that even though Julius is not a tyrant now, but in time he will become a corrupt tyrant. After the people hear of Julius Caesar’s death …show more content…
They both had a vigorous crowd and convince them to their side. Even though Brutus had to face the crowd first who wanted his head. He was able to calm them down and convince them Caesar was a tyrant. But, Anthony had to worry about the conspirators killing him if he talks bad about them, defend a Caesar’s corpse, and convince the crowd to go against conspirators. This was a lot of things Mark had to defend against. In addition to defending a Caesar’s dead body Antony had to go back in the past to things he has done for the people, and he is not even defending himself. Not alone that Antony has to worry about the conspirators, he even sent a servant to the scene of murder to make sure he was not a target on the group of conspirators list. Consequently, leading to Antony fearing for his life while giving his speech. Then after he gave his speech he was able not only calm the crowd, but to convince them to go against the conspirators and want kill them. Overall while Brutus’s speech was exceptional and was able to calm the crowd and change their minds into thinking Caesar was a tyrant. Antony’s speech was superior and was able to convince the people to go kill the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In my opinion, Antony speech was more delivered better because includes several persuasive details in his speech. After saying that his intent wasn't to praise Caesar, he says, "He was my friend, faithful and just to me. " Antony's speech points out many of Caesar acts that had benefited them as Roman citizens. He plays with their minds saying that Caesar had been generous to them and protected them from the "intruders". He uses rhetorical questions, irony, and etc. to effectively persuade his audience to join his side instead of Brutus'.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What is the Greatness of a Change Agent? A great example of a Change Agent is Julius Caesar. A change agent is someone who makes a great impact on people and their lives and this is exactly what Caesar did. He made a number changes, and these changes were so capacious that they stood with the people of Rome. Julius managed to do more than he could imagine as a leader.…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony, in his eulogy, presented himself as filled with grief and loss; however, a form of subliminal persuasion and manipulation is used to sway the Roman people in his favor. The loyal friend of Caesar appeared to be supportive of the conspirators, but his devotion to the true king never wavered. While he praised the conspirators for being “such honorable men”, Antony admitted how he grieved for his friend. He utilized paralipsis in his cajolery, stating that “I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, / But here I am to speak what I do know.”…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetoric, it’s all around us whether we realize it or not. In Act Three of Julius Caesar, Caesar moves to the capitol after refusing Artemidorus’ letter of warning. Shortly after, the conspirators (people who were planning to kill Caesar) stab him to death. Antony flees the scene but Brutus convinces everybody to let him live. Brutus then explains to the people of Rome the meaning of why they had killed Caesar, but what Brutus, the conspirators, and people of Rome don’t know, is that Antony is pretending to be an ally but in reality, plans on striking back with the help of Octavius Caesar.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was Caesar truly a bad person, and was his murder necessary? What caused the people to believe Ceasar was a bad person. Was Caesar truly a bad person or was he just framed for false beliefs. Was Caesar's death necessary, the Tragedy of Julius Caesar reveals information about Caesar and his death.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech ultimately leads to a battle between him and the conspirators. Brutus has good intentions, but nevertheless he makes a lot of bad decisions which eventually leads to his…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar was assonated by conspirators that were said to be his closest friends. I am asked to explain the justification of the conspirators. The Conspirator’s in the assignation of Julius Caesar used jealousy, hatred, and discontent with the fashion that Caesar Ruled Rome as Justification for their act of murder again him. Furthermore, I will explain how these three justifications were used in the following paragraphs.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Spring Final There are several occurrences that prove the theory that words are more powerful than weapons. In the play Julius Caesar a guy by the name of Marc Antony convinces a whole crowd of people to revolt against their leader. In Germany Hitler did a similar thing, he turned the people to his radical side. They used persuasive speech and gave the people offers that caused them to be loyal to them.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is significant because it shows that Brutus is aware of his reputation and desires to use it to help his cause. However, Antony outshines Brutus due to the fact he refutes Brutus' claim and manipulates the crowd into believing that Brutus' cause is not…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He convinces the crowd that Caesar was great. The crowd would feel guilty about trusting Brutus, after Antony persuaded them he was almost pathetic, this makes the crowd angry and they rebel. Antony also says "Here was Caesar! When comes such another?" which makes the citizens feel guilty and like they'll never get another Caesar, so they have missed there chance to let Caesar…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony has to slowly plant doubt and anxiety that perhaps Brutus was wrong; that although he is a good and honorable man, Brutus could have just murdered another good man, who was only doing good for Rome. Antony uses his words to manipulate the people’s minds much better than Brutus did. The people know that Antony was Caesar’s good friend and the good things he is saying about Caesar are credible. Since Antony is changing the crowd’s perspective about who Caesar was, his continuous good remarks about Brutus keep them from getting angry and…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Caesar was killed just for having ambition. Maybe the determination to make everyone slaves. With all that said Brutus did have the better funeral speech than Antony, he not only spoke about why he killed Caesar he commemorated him as his friend that he had so much love for. Antony did not really entice the reader with his speech to summarize what he said is Brutus is an honorable man (x3 times), Caesar did not have any ambition because he brought captives home to Rome and the money brought great wealth to the city, Antony tried to give Caesar a kingly crown and he refused three times, and the people should love Caesar as they once did. These statements do not entice the reader Antony should have talked more about the bad that Caesar did.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Two different speeches. Two different people. Two different ways to appeal to the people about the death of Caeser. That's exactly what I came here to explain the way both of them came about their speeches on the same thing. Brutus and Antony are very different people and their approach itself was different as well.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The acclaimed play written by William Shakespeare,The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, should go by another name, The Tragedy of Brutus. Brutus is the main character and hidden protagonist, he is a senate member scarred by Ceaser rising so quickly to kingdom. After being mislead by many friends he decides to assist in the murder of Julius Caesar. The noble Brutus is truly the only protagonist in the play, he should be the center of the play in the stead of the short lived and arrogant Julius Caesar.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before Antony’s speech, the crowd calls the deceased Caesars names and acknowledge Brutus as if he was their savior. Brutus ask the crowding a very common-sensed question whether if they didn’t loved Rome and freedom, majority of the crowd answered no. Immediately after the crowd answered the risky question Caesar had to be immediately killed. What Antony did for his own good and maybe others explained that he is a calm man who allows common sense to answer his questions and others as well. Antony does not seek action with resisting Caesar’s murder but his words spoke a bit louder if he were to act on the situation.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays