Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

Improved Essays
In the play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare was able to show how rhetorical devices are able to persuade an audience. In Shakespeare’s play, Mark Antony, who was loyal to Caesar, delivered a speech to Romans that supported Brutus after the funeral of Caesar. The speech conveyed why Caesar was a loyal Roman. By depending on expressing emotions, usage of diction, and logic of the argument, Antony persuades the Roman citizens that Caesar had more loyalty than Brutus.

Throughout his speech, Antony appeals to the audience’s emotions to persuade the audience that Caesar was a virtuous leader who did not deserve a premature death. He begins using appeals of emotion by building up Caesar’s character to show compassion to the audience. Mark brings up how “when the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept” to explain to the citizens that Caesar cared for everyone and how he saw himself as no better than everyone else(III. II. 19). By describing Caesar’s compassion, Mark is able to persuade the audience about how Caesar is a prominent leader. Antony also indicated emotions of sorrow to strike compassion in the citizen’s hearts. He establishes his love for Caesar by declaiming how his “heart is in the coffin there with Caesar” to express the amount of sorrow he
…show more content…
He is able to describe the rage of the residents with the style of diction used. He explains how he would “stir [their] hearts and minds to mutiny and rage” to, in detail, show how angry citizens were because of Julius(III. II. 40). He later talks about Julius’ will and how “it will inflame [them] to describe how the people will react(III. II. 61). The diction used in the speech is able to display exactly how the townspeople will react. His denotative diction helps the audience understand that Antony knows their reactions to the situation of Caesar's death, and helps Antony with his persuasion because he knows how the people

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony fosters a strong sense of emotion in his compelling speech at Julius Caesar’s funeral to the Roman people in Act III, scene ii, lines 74-147. Antony prefaces the deliverance of his speech by calling Brutus and Cassius’ honorability into consideration, but ultimately criticizes them and ignites a fire of rage within the citizens of Rome. This scene occurs shortly after the assassination of Caesar. At this point, the Roman people hold the conspirators in high regard as the narrative of the execution is characterized as being for the benefit of the city. Throughout Antony’s speech, however, public opinion shifts dramatically against the conspirators.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The historical play, “Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare illustrates the problems of leadership that commence after the assassination of the Roman dictator, Julius Caesar. The play has a thorough use of rhetorical devices and was a powerful persuasion tool during the whole of the show. This literary device is extensively used during the funeral scene in Act three, Scene two where Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony give their speeches about Caesar's death. In their funeral speeches, while Marcus Brutus delivered a logical speech, Mark Antony overall wins the crowd through his use of ethics and empathy. Antony’s speech left such a lasting impact due his skillful use of Pathos.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony uses pathos as one of his techniques to make the roman people betray Brutus. Antony said “when the poor have cried Caesar hath wept; ambition be made with sterner stuff.” Antony is turning the crowd against Brutus by proving and clarifying Caesar is not ambitious. Antony used another persuasive technique by logos to prove Caesar was not ambitious. Antony said, “you know how Caesar loved you.”…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony knows that because of his use of emotion he will be able to manipulate the crowd to go against Brutus and the…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony uses his loving sensibility to pull on the peoples' heartstrings to persuade them of his point. First of all, Antony sets the mood by using powerful words such as, "Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears." (Shakespeare Act 3 Scene 2). Antony knows that in order to effectively persuade the audience he needs to address them as if they are all equal. He makes himself seem vulnerable as then the people would be more willing to trust him.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the exchange between Caesar…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony delivered a more effective speech than Brutus by using many rhetorical devices including irony, pathos, . By making his speech emotional and manipulative, Antony convinces the people of Rome to avenge Caesar's death with him. In their speeches, both Brutus and Antony use irony to appeal to the people’s emotions and convince them of different beliefs. One example of irony in Brutus’s speech is in the lines “Who is here so vile…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Words are the knives that stab Caesar, each one coming at a different angle and with more force than the one before. If hit in the wrong place, one can kill, if not, one leaves them in pain and suffering. Throughout the play Julius Caesar, written by playwright William Shakespeare, friends and foes attain the forceful weapons of words. Following the assassination of the great ruler Julius Caesar, two well-respected men, Brutus and Antony, express the power of speech to gain the crowds affection during the funeral of the beloved Caesar. Brutus, a well respected Conspirator and Antony, a loyal friend of Caesar, avail rhetorical and literary devices, conveying different tones of persuasion and matter of fact against manipulation and melancholy…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this example, emotion is used to create a persuasive argument with the people of Rome. Antony uses pathos throughout his speech in act III. “Bear with me, my heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me” (Act III. scene ii. lines 102-104). Here Antony is prompting the audience to feel empathetic toward him.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to avenge Caesar, Mark Antony turns a shocked, confused crowd of mourners into an angry mob of rioters by using persuasive techniques. The main component of Antony’s speech, Pathos, appealed to the commoners by striking an emotional spot inside them, trying to turn the fickle crowd against Brutus. Antony displayed the persuasive technique of Pathos by repeating words, showing them Caesar’s body, and presenting Caesar’s will. In the beginning of Antony’s speech, he spoke of Brutus as an honorable man, but in this case he repeated the word, making the connotation of honorable negative.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He convinces the crowd that Caesar was great. The crowd would feel guilty about trusting Brutus, after Antony persuaded them he was almost pathetic, this makes the crowd angry and they rebel. Antony also says "Here was Caesar! When comes such another?" which makes the citizens feel guilty and like they'll never get another Caesar, so they have missed there chance to let Caesar…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Scene 2 of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony turned a crowd of mourning citizens to an angry mob. Antony turned this crowd into an angry mob through multiple persuasive devices. Brutus and the other conspirators thought they were killing Caesar for the good of Rome, but Antony and other ideas. He wanted to discreetly show the crowd of Romans who the conspirators actually were to him, a group of murderers. In order to persuade the people to not have sympathy for the Conspirators, Antony showed them Caesar’s will, repetitively said the word “honorable”, and showed them Caesar’s body.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony perfectly tailors all these elements in his speech to achieve the goal of getting the commoners on his side and against…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony had the herculean task of turning the Roman population against Brutus and the other conspirators. To do this, Antony needed to follow up Brutus ' powerful oration with a short, supervised speech. Still, in little time Antony had turned the tides and had the Plebeians on his side. He had used certain devices in his speech, several of which include equalization, repetition, emotion, humility, irony, inflation, and anticipation, to aid in his success. Antony 's strategies worked like a charm, and even before his funeral oration had finished he and the conspirators all knew who had the upper hand.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays