An intriguing statistic described in the book was based on the patient being interrupted during history taking. It is amazing that over seventy-five percent of patients are interrupted during their history. After reading this statistic, I thought back on the times that I did this during my history taking. At times, I felt I was trying to guide them along but in reality I should have let them describe in their own words. It is important to allow the patient to discuss their situation and allow them to feel they are part of the process. The book describes history taking as collaborative. …show more content…
A study by Brendan Reilly found had a diagnosis not been found on a thorough exam it would not have been found by diagnostic testing. The physical exam can provide essential clues to direct further testing if needed. To further illustrate this thought process involved diagnosing appendicitis at bedside while reducing the amount of CT scans being performed. This allowed improved time for surgical intervention with a thorough physical examination. It is mentioned that technology is eroding, melting away this ancient, massive and essential part of the way a physician knows the human