Pros And Cons Of Using Animal Testing For Medical Research

Decent Essays
Although using animal testing for medical research still occurs today and some may agree or disagree with the policy, using animals for testing is cruel and inhumane, alternative methods replace the need for test subjects, and the results are often unreliable since they are not the same as human beings.

Many scientist and proponents of animal testing declare that the animals are being treated humanely but according to a government survey, “Across the EU, 93% of research is conducted on animals which are not counted under the US Animal Welfare Act.” These animals are especially vulnerable to mistreatment and abuse without the protection of the AWA.

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Roughly twenty-six million animals are used for different types of testing in the United States every year (Animal Testing - Procon.org). These tests range from developing medical treatments, determining the toxicity of medications, checking the safety of products that will be used by humans, to healthcare and commercial uses (Animal Testing - Procon.org). Proponents to animal research and testing back their views up with the fact that there are laws in place to prevent the mistreatment of animals, such as the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) (Animal Testing - Procon.org). The Animal Welfare Act defines an animal as, “any live or dead dog, cat, monkey, guinea pig, hamster, rabbit, or such other warm blooded animal.” (Animal Testing - Procon.org).…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Simon Festing and Robin Wilkinson, in their article, The Ethics of Animal Research, published in June 2007, address the topic of animal experimentation and testing and argue that it has greatly benefitted medical research and that discontinuing its use would have serious consequences in public health. Festing and Wilkinson support their claim first by establishing their credibility with the use of many reputable sources, second by utilizing data and statistics, and lastly by taking into consideration the perspectives of the opposing side. The overall purpose of the authors is to clarify the current issues with animal research in order to prove that testing animals is still the best solution. The authors employ a scientific tone in order to present an argument that appeals to individuals that have diverse views…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While scientists often argue that animal testing is necessary for medical advancement, it can be considered inhumane and is not always necessary. Animals are used in research to determine the safety of products, advance in science, study disease, and develop forms of treatment. While there are alternatives for…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Reality

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Harsh Reality of Animal Testing “Think about spending your entire life like a prisoner, even though you have committed no crime.” This is a reality for animals in laboratories and is accompanied with feels of deprivation, isolation, and misery. In the United States the law allows different forms of animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, addicted to drugs, and brain damaged. No matter how painful or trivial, no experiment is prohibited and not one animal’s life is spared even when alternatives are available. Animal testing traces back to ancient times where physician scientists performed procedures on animals.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals are delicate creatures that want to live as they wish. History has shown that testing on humans is very controversial and not socially accepted in most places. Humans should have this viewpoint on animal testing too. Animal testing is a very debatable issue. For years’ animals have been mistreated by having inhumane people test different products or medicines on them.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As always we have the two black and white perspective, black being that animal testing is wrong because it’s unethical to torture animals and use them as tools for furthering knowledge, as well as that animal should have the same basic rights as a human being. And white being that, animal testing has what has helped the development of many new drugs and advances in multiple issues. Another perspective has been added which argues that progress in new drugs can still be possible, by injecting anesthesia appropriately, and training the staff professionally enough to handle animals properly. That way animals feel less pain and still we can continue the research for many issues going…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animals have been used repeatedly in the past for biomedical research, in recent years animal testing has been under severe criticism by animal rights groups. Laws have been passed in many countries in order to make animal testing more ‘humane’ but many argue that the benefit to humans is not worth the torture to these defenseless animals. Scientists William Russel and Rex Burch publish a book titled “The principles of Humane Experimental Technique” in 1959 where they expressed their concerns with animal testing. Due to their concern along with other factors it led to the Animal Welfare Act by the U.S. federal government in 1966. Although the act did not stop animal testing it did ensure that the animals received proper care.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Each year, more than 100 million animals—including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds—are killed in U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing(Using)”. It is estimated that at least 6% of the animals also experience pain. It may not look like a lot, but 6% is a lot when there are more than 100 million animals being tested. According to Orlans, the animals suffer from "vomiting, diarrhea, paralysis, convulsion, and internal bleeding. Since death is the required endpoint, dying animals are not put out of their misery by euthanasia"…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abolishing Animal Testing

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal testing causes pain to animals all over the world, it exploits them for our need. It has existed for hundreds of years, but recently a movement has started to abolish the usage of animals in testing products and medication. Animal testing is wrong and should be abolished in favor of newer, better solutions, it often causes pain to the animal, and in most cases the results cannot be applied to humans, some may argue that because animal testing is a tried and true science, it must stay, but there are now technological advances to replace it. Animal testing causes animals pain, and therefore it is an inhumane practice and should be abolished. In 2007, over 77,000 animals suffered pain due to animal testing and were not given drugs to…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “In July 19, 2011, USDA inspection report cites the Harvard Medical School five times for violations including unqualified personnel, inadequate supervision of experimentation by the lab's Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee, and inadequate housing for primates” (Hunnicutt). Despite the benefits of animal testing, animal rights activists have shed a light on the horrible things these animals needlessly suffer. Because of this information, laws were passed against treating animals inhumanely; however, we still hear about examples of cruelty in animal testing to this day. In the past, animal testing has helped create lifesaving medicines and procedures, but it should not be allowed anymore because despite laws, companies continue to abuse animals, and new technologies are continuing to be developed everyday that can replace animal testing.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing for decades has been a long debated question in the scientific community. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Animal testing is a vital and common procedure that has raised controversy regarding if animal testing is ethical. The use of animal testing has allowed for the development of safe medicines, vaccines, and advancements in scientific knowledge. Without the sacrifices made during animal testing, we would not have made the achievements in medication, knowledge, cosmetics, and saving lives.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I believe that animal experimentation is a valid medical research technique and am support it. I believe this for a multitude of reasons, the biggest being as follows: animal experimentation is necessary for the betterment of medical technologies and drug development, alternatives are not as cost efficient and do not produce results that are as accurate as those produces by animal experimentation, and animals do not have equal rights to humans. I personally find these reasons to be irrefutable cause for the continuation of the use of animals throughout science. These reasons, backed by evidence and facts, cause me to believe that animal experimentation, although controversial, is both an ethically and scientifically valid method. I believe…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Viewpoints

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After studying multiple views on animal testing I have come to realize my personal view has now changed since the start of my research. Before undergoing heavy study into animal testing I believed that all types of animal testing should be stopped, but now I believe that the idea is very beneficial and should only be done when the rights of the animal are considered. In the coming years, hopefully, more regulations can be passed to ensure that all animal’s lives are protected during experimentation. Although most animals are treated with care and no pain is dealt to them when undergoing testing, it would be a lie if I stated no animals are harmed during the process. Animal testing is extremely useful in developing life-saving drugs and medicine.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Though I concede that in some situations, animal testing may be useful, such as in immensely important medical studies, I still maintain that it is unnecessary to make an animal suffer and be discriminated against. Although some people may think that animal testing is healthy and beneficial to humans, I believe that animal testing is unethical and utterly wrong because of the unfair repulsive treatment that animals receive from scientists. This topic is important because the world we live in is as much an animal 's world as it is a human’s world and right now humans are discriminating and enslaving…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing? Introduction: An estimated twenty six million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Animals should not be used for scientific or commercial testing because animal testing is cruel and inhumane, animals make poor test subjects, and animals’ rights are violated. I. Animals should be used for scientific or commercial testing.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays