Arguments Against Animal Testing

Improved Essays
Animal testing for decades has been a long debated question in the scientific community. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Animal testing is a vital and common procedure that has raised controversy regarding if animal testing is ethical. The use of animal testing has allowed for the development of safe medicines, vaccines, and advancements in scientific knowledge. Without the sacrifices made during animal testing, we would not have made the achievements in medication, knowledge, cosmetics, and saving lives. Research in animals have played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefits. However, what many people tend to forget the great numbers …show more content…
Chimpanzees share 99% of their DNA with humans, and mice are 98% genetically similar to humans. (source N) Animals have the same set of organs that function essentially the same way as humans, because of this animals and humans are susceptible to many of the same conditions and illness, including heart disease, cancer and diabetes. Some argues that animals are very different from human beings and therefore make poor test subjects. In Source O, the anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings. It is also said that drug that is passed during animal testing are not necessarily safe. According to source Q, animal testing on the arthritis drug Vioxx showed that it had a protective effect on the hearts of mice, yet the drug went on to cause more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac death before being pulled from the market. Animal tests do not reliably predict results in human beings. According to Aysha Akhtar, over 100 stroke drugs that were effective when tested on animals have failed in humans, after working well in non-human primates and a study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America found that nearly 150 clinical trials of treatments to reduce inflammation in critically ill patients have been undertaken, and all of them failed, despite being successful in animal tests. (Source S) Animal testing may also mislead researchers into ignoring potential cures and treatments. According to neurologist Aysha Akhtar in source R, said that Aspirin was almost “shelved,” because the chemicals were extremely harmful to animals even though it is proven that it is valuable when used by humans. With experiments failing in animals, it waste the lives of the animals subjects Since the majority of animals used in biomedical research are killed

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Proponents of animal testing argue that it is productive because of how similar humans and animals are in many ways, including having the same set of organs, blood stream, and central nervous system (16 Integral Pros and Cons of Animal Experimentation). However, humans and animals actually differ greatly because of many metabolic, cellular, and anatomical differences. Animals and humans react very differently to many substances and diseases (16 Integral Pros and Cons of Animal Experimentation). This makes animals poor test subjects (16 Integral Pros and Cons of Animal Experimentation). Proponents also argue that animal testing not only benefits humans, but the animals as well (16 Integral Pros and Cons of Animal Experimentation).…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Do We Kill Animals?

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    With the evolving computer technology, there are virtual reconstructions of the human molecular structure and can predict the toxicity of substances. Chimpanzees share almost 99% of their DNA with humans and rats share 98%, so why would a chimpanzee not be a perfect test animal? According to Paul Furlong, a professor at Aston University says that all animals have anatomic, metabolic and cellular difference from humans. “We are not 70 kg rats”(animal-testing) states Thomas Hartung, a professor at John Hopkins University, he argues that there are alternatives because an animals response to an experiment will not always be a humans…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some doctors and scientists believe animal testing is not the best method for medical advances for many reasons and examples. In multiple cases, certain drugs have proven effective on animals but are not effective on humans. This occurs most often when testing drugs for stroke. Others include the following examples: a therapeutic dose of aspirin in a human is poisonous, but it has no negative effects to different animals; benzene causes leukemia in humans but not in mice; insulin produces birth defects in humans but not in animals; morphine calms people but excites some animals; chloramphenicol produces aplastic anemia in some humans but saves animals; fenclozic acid causes liver toxicity in people but not in some animals; penicillin is highly poisonous to a few animals but helps humans (Gorman 49).…

    • 1858 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A possible concern is that over 100 million animals- mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds- are used for research and experiments each year. These animals are forced to test poisoning for burning skin, toxicity testing, causing brain damage, and many other horrible tests. The innocent creatures are harmed and sometimes killed in the process. On the other hand, scientists are doing these many different types of tests to learn more about health problems that affect both humans and animals. Since animals are biologically related to humans, it makes them good research subjects.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There has been several tests that have gone wrong on humans but they when they tested the drug on the animal it went perfect. Élan Pharmaceuticals created a vaccine to fight Alzheimer, the vaccine worked perfect on mice, the vaccine cured the mice from Alzheimer. They used the same vaccine on humans but the results were different, their central nervous system inflamed (Alzheimer's Vaccine Trials Suspended). It is clear that testing drugs and substances on animals is not safe for humans. Another example to prove that animal testing is not a safe way to test drugs is the process of replacing hormones on women.…

    • 2202 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. These animals are subjected to forced feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, infliction of burns and wounds to study the healing process and effects and remedies. Among the cruelest experiments is the Draize eye test which evaluates irritation by shampoos and other products to the eyes. During this experiment rabbits are restrained and their eyelids are held open by clips for multiple days which leads to the death of 50% of rabbits used (Scientific American, "Do Cosmetic Companies Still Test on Live Animals?," scientificamerican.com). We also are very different from animals; having different metabolic, anatomical, and cellular differences.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Claude Bernard, the father of physiology, once stated that "experiments on animals are entirely conclusive for the toxicology and hygiene of man. The effects of these substances are the same in man as on animals, save for differences in degree"(Animal Testing and Medicine). It is a common practice over history to test on animals due to their similar biology to humans. After all, a mouse shares 98% of DNA with a human. It is also seen as more humane to test an animal with a new drug than a human.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A.D Williams “When I look into the eyes of an animal I do not see an animal. I see a living being. I see a friend. I see a soul. “ In our lives animals are the only thing that are there for us they don't judge us there always there when we have our down days and they bring joy .…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you have taken medication or visited a hospital, chances are that an animal was used to help diagnose you, or create the medication you are prescribed to. Animal testing is a prevalent problem that has sparked a debate both politically and ethically. Across the United States over a hundred million animals are abused in testing facilities each and every year. Whether it may be curing cancer, trying to end a disease or creating beauty products, animals will die daily. One of the questions this topic raises is whether animal testing is ethically acceptable and should it be continued in the name of science and medical advances.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While some may consider animal testing to be unethical, it can be argued that many steps have been taken to make these studies as humane as possible. It is also clear that studies on humans are less desirable and ethical than tests on animals. The future of medicine lies with these animals. In the years to come, animal research may yield the keys to curing cancer, HIV, influenza, heart disease, Alzheimer’s dementia, tissue, regeneration, and many more. Blocking the use of animal testing would undoubtedly mean the loss of millions of additional human lives.…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing was revived in Greece about 2300 years ago; however, it became widely used only from 1850 (Understanding animal research, 2015). After this time, many breakthroughs were made such as insulin for diabetics, hepatitis C vaccine and medicine for epilepsy, which have saved countless number of animals’ and humans’ lives (AMP, 2015). Today, we have developed many alternatives to animal testing, thanks to new technologies, which are used to develop and test new medicine and treatments; nevertheless, it is still impossible to exclude animals from animal research yet. It is estimated that more than 115 million animals globally are used every year for different purposes such as developing new medicine and treatments, determining the toxicity,…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An analysis of over 100 mouse cell types found that only 50% of the DNA responsible for regulating genes in mice could be matched with human DNA. How could this be safe? Tests that may pass as safe on a mouse may not have the same effects as a human. II. Many will argue that if we didn 't use animals we would have to test new drugs on people.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Against Animal Testing

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Advanced technology now enables researchers to use computer generated animals for testing. Scientists claim that animal testing for biological reasons can be productive for medical research. However, it is proven that only 2% of human illnesses and diseases ever occur in animals. One of the reasons that animal experiments fail is that all different animals suffer from different illnesses.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Millions of animals are put through unavailing animal tests each year, and most of them suffer abuse that is senseless because most tests are inaccurate. Peggy Carlson, an animal rights activist and head of the humane society argues “Nearly everything that medicine has learned about what substances cause human cancer and birth defects has come from human clinical and epidemiological studies because animal experiments do not accurately predict what occurs in humans” (161). In other words animals are being used and abused in tests that are not even projecting similar results as they would if humans were to do the test. Scientists say animals are used in testing because they are similar to humans in many ways. The truth is, they are similar to humans in many ways, but we are not exactly identical and also have many differences that affect test results.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited

    Now days, society can volunteer themselves in clinical drug research for a monetary exchange. With modern science “we can see inside peoples’ brains using imaging machines or test microscopic amounts of new drugs harmlessly on volunteers.” (BUAV.org the campaign to end animal experiments, pg 7) Humans are more willing to volunteer themselves for the money, but also because strict health and safety precautions are put in place for their well-being at all times during the study. Humans can also communicate their side effects and pain occurrence which provides sound and optimal results for future modifications and or dosages. Unfortunately, animals cannot communicate these important factors, which in turn is useless.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited
    Superior Essays