Nazi-Soviet Pact Analysis

Improved Essays
1. Hitler claim of returning Germany to its former glory and boundaries was nothing more than a ruse to cover up his true intentions. Since the beginning he was bent on conquering all of Europe and uniting it underneath the Germanic flag of the Nazi Empire. Hitler first had to develop a strategy that would allow him to rebuild the country while also expanding Germany’s size. Due to the atmosphere after WWI many of the western countries powers such as England and France established appeasement policy to avoid conflict that would start another war. Seeing his opportunity Hitler started rebuilding Germany by investing in heavy industry and reorganizing and controlling society through propaganda. One important part of Hitler’s plan was to create …show more content…
When the time came on March 12th & 13th Hitler invaded Austria and later on March 7, 1936 German soldiers were deployed to Rhineland. This was devastating to France as Rhineland served as barrier from Germany. Acquiring new land and the increasing size and power of his military, he indicated a defense alliances with Italy, Japan and most importantly Russia. Do to the location of Germanys position between the West and Russia, Hitler sought to avoid a war on both fronts. While Hitler and Stalin despised each other. Hitler proposed the Nazi-Soviet Pact in 1936. The Pact divided the Poland and other countries between Russia and Germany. Hitler’s achieved his goal of creating another buffer zone between Russia. However, Russia would get Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia essentially creating its own buffer zone. The pact also provided Russia time to build up its army. After the annexing of Poland and Rhineland it became clear what Hitler’s true objective. Even the alliances he proposed were just to provide him the advantage to expand with the help of other countries. Hitler’s Germany had now become the third largest nation in Europe. What can be concluded throughout Hitler’s “rebuilding of Germany” was not at all what he claimed. His true goal was to conquer all of Europe by employing alliances and slowly advancing towards the West

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Non-Aggression pact meant that Hitler was able to, “obliterate Poland and to drive victory in the west.” where he expects victory to surround him and successfully expand and build his empire. For the Soviet Power, it meant that they were able to move west into central Europe with Germany clearing the way for them. 2.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By exploring this topic, we can learn about how the Treatment of Blacks in United States is similar and different to the treatment of Jews in Germany. Adolf Hitler is known for how he treated Jews in the holocaust. For this research project, this topic will compare the Treatment of Blacks and the Treatment of Jews. For both of these treatments , they both had human rights violated and had to suffer. Adolf Hitler was one of the greatest dictators throughout history, he is known to be very powerful figure.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hitler's true ambition is revealed as he writes "Germany will either be a world power or there will be no Germany at all" In this he is saying that either Germany will rise to have world power and domination…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He wanted to redistribute the work from the factories to the farms, the focus to rebuilding the economy was based in Agriculture. Hitler knew the cause of Germany’s problems stemmed from the Treaty of Versailles. Germany was blamed for all the problems of the war, then stripped of their land and means to trade. Hitler frequently ruminated on the anger that Germany felt from being suppressed after the war. “MORE than fourteen years have passed since the unhappy day when the German people, blinded by promises from foes at home and abroad, lost touch with honor and freedom, thereby losing all“ (Hitler, 1933).…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Germany had control over Western Europe, central Europe and most of Eastern Europe including Scandinavia. Britain had been badly effected at this stage she was merely fighting for survival, the only to threats against Germany were the Soviet Union and the United States who at this stage maintained neutrality. Russia was just across the border and yielded a large enemy, which Hitler viewed as a potential threat, therefore he sought to destroy her and assume control over the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was the last obstacle Germany needed to tackle in order to assume control over Europe. ‘Adolf Hitler had always regarded the German-Soviet non-aggression pact , signed on August 23, 1939, as a temporary tactical maneuver.…

    • 2376 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 1939 Molotov- Ribbentrop pact was a neutrality pact between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union signed in Moscow on 23 August 1939. The pact remained in force for about two years until Hitler ended the pact by launching an attack on the Soviet posting in Eastern Poland. The neutrality pact was signed between the soviet union and Japan it called for the two nations to be neutral when any of the nations was invaded by a third nation. The neutrality pact between the Soviet Union and Japan ended because Japan didn’t remain neutral when the Soviet Union was attacked. Instead, Japan (an ally of Germany) declared war on U.S.A and England which were the Soviet Union’s allies.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then, Hitler had his different views and visions for all of Germany was when the people began to listen. Hitler had an exceptionally different, and very interesting idea of what he wanted for Germany to be like and how he’d get there. Hitler promised a better future for them. He promised them that he would take back all that was theirs, no madder how hard it would be. He persuaded them that they had no right to take their land in the first place so why not take it back.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hitler became chancellor in Germany on the 30th January 1933. 1 He formed the Nazi Party to change the structure of Germany through social, economic and political reforms; primarily to restore Germany to its’ former glory after the war and Treaty of Versailles had. A reform is the improvement or amendment of what is wrong, corrupt, unsatisfactory, etc. Hitler was ruthless in trying to achieve his goal and his methods reflected his violent and aggressive nature.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Nonaggression Pact

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hitler thought it would lead to weakening the army and have an outcome of losing the war. Hitler tried to join together two countries to create a relationship. The Nonaggression pact joined the Soviet Union and Germany to a friendship of lies. Hitler invaded Poland as planned, but lied to the Soviet Union and also invaded…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hitler’s actions that went against the Treaty of Versailles, and the steps taken to help with dealing with him are two of the reasons WWII began. They used appeasement to try to keep the peace.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The war brought upon a desire for repentance from God and a want to achieve 'German greatness '. The Hitler Myth uses the pre-world war one attitudes in order to create this idea that under his control, he will rise Germany out of…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    N, N.D). Germany’s army grew and the Germans were very convinced with the idea of bringing Germany back to its finest. Hitler could have only done this because fascism was around, which gave him individual power over Germany, so he could do anything he wanted (Russo. D, 2013). The Treaty of Versailles, appeasement, the League of Nations and Hitler’s actions were all causes of World War…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The remilitarization of the Rhineland and the invasion of Czechoslovakia were both significant events that bolstered Hitler’s control over the German army; however, the former was more fundamental to the establishment of Hitler’s control of the German military. The German forces had not seen the Rhineland since the Treaty of Versailles had been established, which had no influence of German diplomats to agree to the terms. This event was so significant because it altered the balance of power in Europe allowing Germany to lead an administration of aggression, meaning they were able to attack other nations without the fear of repercussions. This allowed Hitler to strike Western Europe, specifically France, with much ease without any intervention from other nations. The occupation of Czechoslovakia was less crucial to Hitler’s plan because his remilitarization of the Rhineland had already…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Molotov-Ribbentrop pact between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany renounced war between the two countries, giving the Soviet Union much needed time to strengthen itself before Germany’s certain betrayal. Through the pact, Russia was not only promised half of Poland, a territory which had been under Russian sovereignty before World War I, but the Baltic States and Bulgaria. Although Ribbentrop, under the guidance of Hitler, most likely didn’t assume that Russia was ever planning to expand it’s sphere of influence to these regions. With the non-aggression pact, Ribbentrop had secured a safe border with Russia, and through the invasion of Poland had consequently bloodied the hands of Russia in the eyes of the West. When trying to understand…

    • 1099 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fascism and Nazism are two political ideologies that gained a wide support in the first part of the 20th century. The chronology is as follows: fascism was introduced to the Italians by Benito Mussolini in the period between 1919 and 1945 while Nazism appeared in 1933 and faced a rapid decay with the end of the WW2 in 1945. Ideologically, Nazism and fascism diverged to a big extent and were promoted under different slogans. The founder of the fascist ideology—the Italian dictator Benito Mussolini—attempted at imposing an idea that only a state is a functional unit, not a separate human living in it. Things went in a different way with Nazism as Adolf Hitler decided to summon Germans.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays