How Did Appeasement Cause Ww2

Good Essays
In the 1930’s, World War II was something that many countries were desperately trying to avoid. This was a task found as nearly impossible, due to Germany’s fascist leader who craved more and more power. The country’s leaders weren’t sure whether they should use an appeasement, or collective security to deal with him. Also, there were many things that were done to begin this Second World War. The reason why WWI happened is mostly because of Hitler and his violent actions, and the best way to deal with Hitler’s aggression is by using collective security. Hitler’s actions that went against the Treaty of Versailles, and the steps taken to help with dealing with him are two of the reasons WWII began. They used appeasement to try to keep the peace. …show more content…
Throughout the 1930s, many political leaders in both Britain and France came to see that the terms of the Treaty of Versailles had placed restraints on Germany that were cruel. Hitler’s behavior were seen as understandable and reasonable. Neville Chamberlain, Prime Minister of Britain, felt that giving in to Hitler’s request would prevent another war. Eventually, the most memorable example of appeasement was the Munich Agreement. Sooner or later, Hitler invades the rest of Czechoslovakia, breaking the terms of the Munich Agreement much like the Treaty of Versailles and that the appeasement had failed. With this is mind, The League of Nations was a good idea and did have some early success but it was a failure as well. The main reason for the great downfall of the League of Nations is not all countries joined, had no power, had no army and unable to act quickly. Then again, collective security was a plan used to maintaining peace through an organization of states, whose members pledge themselves to defend each other in battle. Which had led to the conclusion of why World War II was plunged into war by Hitler’s violent actions and to get through to him is by collective

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Since the Treaty was enforced by nuclear powers in our scenario, and rational leaders would be deterred by this fact before violating the Treaty. However, due to Hitler’s ambition for empire, he can be categorized as an irrational leader, so I don’t believe he would be deterred by nuclear weapons. For Hitler, undoing the Treaty was the first step in accomplishing his desire for empire. Besides, at a times when Germany started violating the Treaty, countries worldwide were suffering from Great Depression, France and Britain were still recovering from WWI. From Hitler’s point of view, the French and British were too weak to enforce the Treaty.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Treaty of Versailles may have been written in an effort to stop World War I and bring peace between the opposing countries, but it 's outcome was much more harmful. Most facts show and support that the Treaty of Versailles failed in many ways, which therefore lead to World War I. Some facts that help me prove my point include, the treaty highly offended Germany causing them to want revenge, the treaty diminished Germany 's economy, and the treaty affected Germany 's military. All of these points show how the Treaty was responsible for World War II, and how it failed in many different ways. Also, these atrocities made Germany very vulnerable, and lead to the rise in power of Adolf Hitler.…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To a large extent, the Treaty of Versailles, appeasement and Hitler’s actions caused World War 2. The Treaty of Versailles made the Germans angry because the punishments were so harsh, helping them to unite as a country. Hitler inspired the Germans to start the next war, with the Treaty of Versailles and appeasement only helping Hitler to convince the Germans (Chapman.N, N.D.) Appeasement meant that Hitler could get whatever he desired because the other countries were preoccupied by trying to prevent another war occurring (History on the net, 2014). Appeasement made Hitler stronger and helped start World War 2 because he had everything he needed. All of these combined to ultimately start World War 2.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Resolving disputes without the bloodshed of war, may not always be the best option for humanity. Winston Churchill, a member of Parliament, claimed that Chamberlain made a major mistake when it came to the Munich settlement. He argued that Britain’s decision to not go to war against Germany would have serious repercussions on all of Europe. By settling the dispute peacefully with the Nazi’s, this would only encourage Hitler to claim more territory in Europe. Churchill’s speech to Parliament proved to be significant in the twentieth century as he was right in the fact that Britain should have gone to war against Germany.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Sleepwalkers Summary

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    She likewise examines the origins of the Great War but assumes a different approach. By specifically looking at individual pre-war events, she assesses when war became more likely than peace. She sees the war to be a result of strategies malfunctioning, for example, Belgium fending off the Germans. She also distinguishes the roles of individuals who had the power to start or end the war and the pressures that made them commit to their decisions. The historian uses the attacks on Louvain to highlight the senseless destruction of culture from the war, which was inconvenient to all parties as a result of their interlinking economies.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    How To Prevent Ww2

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    intervention who believed that America had not done enough to prevent from reaching a catastrophic level. Furthermore, due to influence the country held, there was a moral obligation to use every resource available to provide a safe haven. Violence and persecution toward the Jews had begun in Germany before the Holocaust had begun particularly with the pogroms that began after the annexation of Austria (13). The U.S. could have easily filled the existing immigration quotas without changing any of the laws (13). However, the government was far more occupied with the reelection of Roosevelt, and allowed the anti-Semitism expressed to skew their decision making.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What triggered WWII? The aftermath of the World War I, and the leadership of Hitler can be considered causes of WWII. After World War I, Germany was put on the hot seat by the rest of the European countries, to face the damage they had caused during wartime. This started when Germany was excluded from the Peace Conference, where the negotiations had taken place to figure out how Germany would pay for the destruction of WWI.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Appeasement is by definition “to yield or concede to the belligerent demands of (a nation, group,person, etc.) in a conciliatory effort, sometimes at the expense of justice or other principles.” Basically, appeasement is giving in to someone providing their demands are reasonable, even at the expense of others. This was a cause of world war II because of the politicians in France and Britain believing that the Treaty of Versailles was unreasonable and unfair to Germany. When they then saw Hitler 's side of things, they thought his actions were justifiable. Neville Chamberlain, British Prime Minister in 1939, said in a speech in 1939 “Yet I believe after my talks with Herr Hitler that, if only time were allowed, it ought to be possible for the arrangements for transferring the territory that the Czech Government has agreed to give to Germany to be settled by agreement under conditions which would assure fair treatment to the population concerned.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hitler lived by this famous quote that he wrote in Mein Kampf , “Germany must be a world power, or there will be no Germany.” Hitler always had this sense of taking over Germany but it’s not so clear as to if he intended a World War. Did he just want to take over Poland, or did he simply just want to take some land for Germany? Ever since Germany’s huge defeat during World War I, and Germany’s weak government, the Weimar Republic, wasn’t doing well. This allowed room for some changes, and the rise of a potential new leader, and so, things began to change in January of 1933, when Hitler was first appointed chancellor over the German government. Hitler promised the German people a better life, and more opportunities, and appealed to everyone…

    • 2220 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nazi Response To Ww2

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Natzi aggression lead Europe to war because what hitler wanted was Europe and he wanted all of it. This all came prevalent when the German troops came into Austria in the late 1930s. It also didn 't help that when Hitler broke the treaty of versailles through doing this that none of the Western power were concerned nor did they act on it. Hitler then also invading Slovakia, hit the nerves of Western civilizations because Hitler had broken yet another promise. The Western democracies then decided and pledged to protect Poland.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays