The Failure Of The Treaty Of Versailles

Improved Essays
Treaty of Versailles

During the 1800s and early 1900s treaties were the answer to peace, however the Treaty of Versailles was one of the most horrific examples of failed diplomacy resulting in World War II and was responsible for million of deaths. The treaty tried to do 3 major things; place restrictions on the German military, force Germany to pay reparations to the Allies and place full responsibility of the war on Germany. Reducing the military would limit Germany’s power and could prevent them from fighting back or provoking another war (Treaty of Versailles and Nazism, 2011). The Treaty of Versailles would have and could have been a success, but its main failures were in its execution and in the terms.

One of the major problems
…show more content…
The treaty’s focal point was Germany and they did everything humanly possible to prevent Germany from having an opinion for their country. Europe blamed Germany for causing World War I, they should split the blame and the cost for the destruction and worked as one to help rebuild Europe. Punishing Germany for their acts during war when they were defending their allies (Improving the Treaty of Versailles). Germany was not the only country at fault for the war, infact every country that took part in the war should have had to help with rebuilding Europe. The Treaty of Versailles was supposed to unite all the nations, instead it focused on restricting and punishing the powers of their opposing treats. Treaties were the main source for peace after each war during this time period, giving comfort to all parties after the war. The Treaty of Versailles was one of the most epic failures of diplomacy and triggered World War II. All wars can be avoided, but we can only speculate what we did in history that could have been avoided. We cannot prove that any situation was the cause of another World

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Sleepwalkers Summary

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The historian uses the attacks on Louvain to highlight the senseless destruction of culture from the war, which was inconvenient to all parties as a result of their interlinking economies. However, countries, such as Russia, underestimated the future impact the war and saw in it advantages such as ending tensions or uniting their countries. Similar to Clark, MacMillan also explains the complications of holding Germany as the responsible party and how this is an ongoing debate to this…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Treaty of Versailles The treaty of Versailles was the peace treaty that brought an end to world war one. The treaty was made by the allied powers with Germany not even allowed to attend the meetings to discuss peace. “Once finished the victors handed it to the Germans to sign or else” (_). The treaty was “so riddled with injustices that is soon had few defends” (_), the treaty put all the blame for the war on Germany and made Germany pay a large sum of money to the victors which made the German economy struggle. The treaty of Versailles war very important since it ended world war one, but it also was one reason Hitler was able to come into power and start world war two.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    H.G. Wells argued that the war was a result of the allies standing back and watching and that the only thing that could truly end the war was tearing down German militarism. By the end of the war the term “war to end all wars” had become very popular. With the end of World War I came the collapse of three major empires in Europe, the Russian empire, Austria- Hungry Empire, and Turkey having severe implications on Europe and the Middle East which allowed the rise of the Soviet Union and the Russian Empire. World War I failed to set boundaries to countries that were capable of sovereignty and new nation states ran into problems.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the book “The Treaty of Versailles” it states “ The first section of the Treaty of Versailles was to covenant of the League of Nations. It opened with a statement of its purpose: ‘The high contracting parties [in] order to promote international co-operation and to achieve international peace and security by the acceptance of obligation not to resort to war (Brezina).’” The treaties main purpose was to stop wars from occurring but right after the treaty was established nations felt the need to resort to war. According to www.PBS.org it states “ The Treaty of Versailles created a political climate in Germany which the right put all the blame on everything that went sour, onto the traty and the lost war. And that created this climate in which many people then began to think one had to fight the war once again,” this shows us how the treaty was so unfair on the part of Germany that people felt another word needed to emerge in order to be released from the current situation they were put into. Instead of representing peace the treaty lead nations into another world war.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Resolving disputes without the bloodshed of war, may not always be the best option for humanity. Winston Churchill, a member of Parliament, claimed that Chamberlain made a major mistake when it came to the Munich settlement. He argued that Britain’s decision to not go to war against Germany would have serious repercussions on all of Europe. By settling the dispute peacefully with the Nazi’s, this would only encourage Hitler to claim more territory in Europe. Churchill’s speech to Parliament proved to be significant in the twentieth century as he was right in the fact that Britain should have gone to war against Germany.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War Guilt clause also called “Article 231” states that the Allies accept “…the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage.” The article mainly blames Germany for the war and also states that Germany has to accept complete responsibility of everyone’s losses; forcing Germany to accept the responsibility for the war, other countries were exempt from this harsh punishment. This act halts Germany from picking itself up after the war, and severely shrank its growth, which later contributed to World War…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Treaty of Versailles may have been written in an effort to stop World War I and bring peace between the opposing countries, but it 's outcome was much more harmful. Most facts show and support that the Treaty of Versailles failed in many ways, which therefore lead to World War I. Some facts that help me prove my point include, the treaty highly offended Germany causing them to want revenge, the treaty diminished Germany 's economy, and the treaty affected Germany 's military. All of these points show how the Treaty was responsible for World War II, and how it failed in many different ways. Also, these atrocities made Germany very vulnerable, and lead to the rise in power of Adolf Hitler.…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Germany was a country who helped start a World War and was not looking for peace. The strong consequences of this treaty is what the world wanted, forcing them to either become peaceful, or taking the time to build their country back up. Even though taking the colonies was very harsh it was the right decision, and as McMillian says, “Germany lost all its colonies, which in fact was a blessing in disguise because they'd never paid. Germany had grabbed some very indifferent colonies around the world” (pg.4). So, as you can see it could have possibly been good for Germany to be crushed and brought to a point where they needed to rebuild.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To a large extent, the Treaty of Versailles, appeasement and Hitler’s actions caused World War 2. The Treaty of Versailles made the Germans angry because the punishments were so harsh, helping them to unite as a country. Hitler inspired the Germans to start the next war, with the Treaty of Versailles and appeasement only helping Hitler to convince the Germans (Chapman.N, N.D.) Appeasement meant that Hitler could get whatever he desired because the other countries were preoccupied by trying to prevent another war occurring (History on the net, 2014). Appeasement made Hitler stronger and helped start World War 2 because he had everything he needed. All of these combined to ultimately start World War 2.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Germany's Complaint

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    President Wilson fundamentally needed everybody to fess up to their mix-ups, acknowledge fault and afterward proceed onward. He expresses, "no single actuality caused the war, however that in the last investigation the entire European framework is in a more profound sense in charge of the war, with its blend of collusions and understandings, a confused surface of interests and undercover work that unfailingly got the entire group of countries in its cross sections,". Germany and its partners should assume fault and be in charge of all harms for World War I. On the off chance that things wouldn't have happened the way that they did, at that point I accept there would have never been as issue with Germany. Issues would have never again been pending.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays