Area 1: Attack Significance
My partner says no offering free college education might cause students who have financial difficulties end up looking for alternative ways to meet their material demands. I don’t quite agree with this point because for many college students the primary reasons that they want to be sugar babies are that they can be brought to the fancy restaurants, be provided with generous gifts, and probably with tuition subsidizes. In an article written by Leroy, he mentions that the top factors that attract young students are that sugar daddies are mature enough so that they could build a mutual beneficial relationship with each other, and monogamy is not required. Personally, I think America emphasizes on individual values culturally, and apparently heavily relying on an older man financially is not the best way to earn their tuitions.
Krogstad claims that 66% of Hispanics students who directly go to the job market declare that they need to work as a full-timer to help support their families as a primary reason for not attending colleges. Even …show more content…
I don’t see the substantial benefits of offering free college education mentioned by my partner in the PowerPoint, and on the other hand, free college education inevitably comes with negative influences as well. She claims the second advantage is that free college education would boost economic development because we can have more skilled graduates. However, today the value of a bachelor’s degree is dropping dramatically compared to the last generation. In addition, like Perez-Pena claims that “The recession that began in 2007 steered still more people into college, especially adults who were past traditional college age and who enrolled in community colleges.” In the short run, there isn’t close connection between college enrollment rates and economic developmental
My partner says no offering free college education might cause students who have financial difficulties end up looking for alternative ways to meet their material demands. I don’t quite agree with this point because for many college students the primary reasons that they want to be sugar babies are that they can be brought to the fancy restaurants, be provided with generous gifts, and probably with tuition subsidizes. In an article written by Leroy, he mentions that the top factors that attract young students are that sugar daddies are mature enough so that they could build a mutual beneficial relationship with each other, and monogamy is not required. Personally, I think America emphasizes on individual values culturally, and apparently heavily relying on an older man financially is not the best way to earn their tuitions.
Krogstad claims that 66% of Hispanics students who directly go to the job market declare that they need to work as a full-timer to help support their families as a primary reason for not attending colleges. Even …show more content…
I don’t see the substantial benefits of offering free college education mentioned by my partner in the PowerPoint, and on the other hand, free college education inevitably comes with negative influences as well. She claims the second advantage is that free college education would boost economic development because we can have more skilled graduates. However, today the value of a bachelor’s degree is dropping dramatically compared to the last generation. In addition, like Perez-Pena claims that “The recession that began in 2007 steered still more people into college, especially adults who were past traditional college age and who enrolled in community colleges.” In the short run, there isn’t close connection between college enrollment rates and economic developmental