Hogan( 2008) and Chapman & O 'Neil (2000)It would appear that leadership is not just noun it is natural process of movement and influence so that leaders are very keen on the relationship with employees and it can be seen that the deal between leader and followers is based on trust and respect .for example to empower people and give them some authority could increase people’s loyalty towards their work and leader as well . Moreover the staff satisfaction might be increased by giving them more responsibility and flexible communication might be done through this. Also these relationships seem to facilitate the process in said and out said the …show more content…
The conception of work in leadership is actually different from the conception of work in management Achua & Lussier ( 2013) and Chapman & O 'Neil ( 2000) in leadership,’ leader’ means the person who might be either a manager or a non-manager. So from this point of view leaders are likely have different strategies and tactics to lead both people and the organization. For instance leaders sometimes work as directors and give orders to the staff to do what they should do however leader can be as one of his follower and work among them at the same level in order to push his team to work as best as they can .In addition workers could learn how to perform well in their work. And from being among these people it is easy for the leader to identify the employees’ abilities and skills. Therefore it appears that leaders are always being updated so they come up frequently with new innovations which might facilitate the process at the company. Felfe & Petersen ( 2007) and Boyatzis ( 1993) and Achua & Lussier, (2013)Another aspect of leadership is transferring some of their responsibilities and authorities to other staff .this agenda is one of the most important aspects in leadership and that