For views of non-leaders, hypothesis 2 was not supported as women and men were equally likely to be short-listed. Hypothesis 3 was supported because male participants were more likely to hire men rather than women, especially when there was no evidence of leadership on the part of the women. This study is interesting because while it confirms that gender bias in the workplace exists among men in hiring decisions, the results indicate that if women are already considered leaders, they may not be discriminated against. The authors concluded that gender bias is a complex process with no single driving factor, but pointed out that women are especially vulnerable. Because most hiring managers are men, unless women come into the situation with management experience, they may not be hired. This presents a major challenge to women and limits upward mobility because they have to be promoted to a leadership position and get experience before taking on a new leadership role in another
For views of non-leaders, hypothesis 2 was not supported as women and men were equally likely to be short-listed. Hypothesis 3 was supported because male participants were more likely to hire men rather than women, especially when there was no evidence of leadership on the part of the women. This study is interesting because while it confirms that gender bias in the workplace exists among men in hiring decisions, the results indicate that if women are already considered leaders, they may not be discriminated against. The authors concluded that gender bias is a complex process with no single driving factor, but pointed out that women are especially vulnerable. Because most hiring managers are men, unless women come into the situation with management experience, they may not be hired. This presents a major challenge to women and limits upward mobility because they have to be promoted to a leadership position and get experience before taking on a new leadership role in another