One criticism to the campaign came from an early September 1948 issue of Tide, “ Charlotte Montgomery discussed the controversy surrounding the campaign. She explained the advertisements—that is, the illustrations (“semi-nudes”) and the copy (“baffling”)—then asked whether the advertisements were directed to consumers. Finally, she added, ‘ I wonder if someone is using a very expensive method to amuse his friends, collect pictures for his whoopee room and cause talk that may flatter egos but can do more harm than good in the long run” (Applegate. 2012. p. 128). Montgomery was not alone with this criticism, there were numerous letters sent in complaining about the campaign, one example is “ your illustrations and copy are both vulgar—and I feel, as do many with whom I have spoken—that you are certainly doing yourself more harm than good” (Applegate. 2012. p
One criticism to the campaign came from an early September 1948 issue of Tide, “ Charlotte Montgomery discussed the controversy surrounding the campaign. She explained the advertisements—that is, the illustrations (“semi-nudes”) and the copy (“baffling”)—then asked whether the advertisements were directed to consumers. Finally, she added, ‘ I wonder if someone is using a very expensive method to amuse his friends, collect pictures for his whoopee room and cause talk that may flatter egos but can do more harm than good in the long run” (Applegate. 2012. p. 128). Montgomery was not alone with this criticism, there were numerous letters sent in complaining about the campaign, one example is “ your illustrations and copy are both vulgar—and I feel, as do many with whom I have spoken—that you are certainly doing yourself more harm than good” (Applegate. 2012. p