Euthanasi Should People Disagree With Its Purpose?

Improved Essays
Some think of euthanasia and instantly disapprove, but if we stop and think of the good this movement can do, can we really disagree with its purpose? Euthanasia has been a conflict of interest for quite some time. People have a tendency to think of death as if it were an unfortunate deed. If the decision between life and death were to come into light, most would agree that eternal life would be their choice of destination, but what about those who suffer from irreversible illnesses? Shouldn’t those helpless individuals have a right to choose when they want to stop fighting for an ending result they know will never happen? I for one, believe in the right of euthanasia. Perhaps, with further explanation, more people can open their minds to the …show more content…
This choice of death can ensure the person that they will die by choice and not suffering. It provides comfort, peace, and a sense of relief. Death is an unimaginable experience, especially for those who are close to us, but, is it any better than watching our loved ones suffer helplessly? To die with control is one thing, but knowing that a person will leave with their own sense of self-respect and self-acceptance is another reason why euthanasia can be seen as an acceptable fate. Identically, people should have a say in what they wish to do with their own life. Despite the fact, that euthanasia has many benefits, there are also quite a few conflicting points that should be justified. In reality, there are very few good things that come with no underlying issues. Despite my choice of acceptance of euthanasia, I must say that there are some concerning points made against this procedure. These opposing viewpoints play a very big role in the disagreement of euthanasia because of the problems it has with religion and mental state of the patient who the option is given to. These issues provide a better understanding of what lies between life and death. Religion is one of the larger affairs associated with this course of …show more content…
I believe a person should have all rights to their own body under the right circumstances. While I can say that I agree with this treatment I must also say that I understand the issues that stand against it. The decision between life and death should not be taken lightly, therefore it is important that all information should be explained. While we can say that death is such a delicate part of life, we should also understand that a life lived with suffering is just as concerning and shouldn’t be taken

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    My opposition to euthanasia being considered a medical treatment is the understanding that the intent of the physician should never be to kill, it ought to always be healing or curing a patient. However, there are cases where neither is possible and with the legalization of euthanasia, patients have a right to not suffer unnecessary pain and elect to die. In such cases, the aim should be to relieve the patient’s suffering, to do what is in the best interest of the patient, and respects the patient’s…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Outline for Arguments on PAS and Euthanasia When addressing the matter of Euthanasia and PAS, “we must first acknowledge that figuring out the benefits and harms of permitting euthanasia or PAS is speculative at best” (Emanuel). As well, it is important to acknowledge the fact that, “no matter which social policy regarding euthanasia or PAS is adopted - legalization or maintaining the current policy of permitting them in individual cases - there will be both benefits and harms” (Emanuel). In this argument, it will be shown that legalizing Euthanasia and PAS within the United States, will help people, by allowing terminally ill patients to realize the end of a good death or, more accurately, a create a higher quality dying experience for them.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The main argument about physician aid in dying and Euthanasia is whether or not it is ethical and whether or not it should be legal everywhere. However, the decision is the patient’s to make. The controversial topic of Physician Assisted Suicide is well known in the United States, and many people have found conflict in this practice because it breaks some religious values. The legalization of this practice, however is slowly progressing all over the world.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia In Australia

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although, it has negative benefits to the public interest, personally, I support for euthanasia. From the point of Utilitarian…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is deliberate assisted suicide to relieve pain and suffering. I believe it should be legalised in Australia as it will ethically and financially benefit people. It would reduce costs to the taxpayer and save families the huge financial cost of having someone in hospital. It also aligns with the basic human right to allow people the right to die with dignity. Euthanasia if practiced properly has the potential to relieve unbearable pain and suffering from terminally ill people.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Often people are not lucky enough to have a chance to tell someone how much they mean to them before it’s too late and they have to discover a loved one took their own life over something that could of easily been fixed with love and support from family and friends. People have their reasons for the choices they make in life and I feel when it comes to their own life and health they should be given the option of euthanasia if they feel this is their own option left that will give them freedom from pain and…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Euthanasia Wrong

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Another way to explain euthanasia in an ethical form would be to take a personal stand on the matter. I personally feel that euthanasia is not morally right. Even though utilitarianism says it’s good other theories and philosophers have greatly disagreed. In particular Samuel von Pufenforf believed in the duty theory. The duty theory states that “we are morally obligated to act in accordance with a certain set of principles and rules regardless of outcome.”…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Euthanasia be legal in Colombia? Everyday, more patients are asking for the legalization of Euthanasia, this is a very controversial topic which has been discussed for many years. Many countries such as Switzerland or Spain have legalized this assisted method of death recently, even though this topic has been studied by different perspectives, such as religious and political, assisted death hasn’t passed through legalization in Colombia. These two organism are mainly against Euthanasia, but its toughest barrier is called catholicism.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why do you think that there is a debate over euthanasia? Why do you think that people participate in euthanasia? Euthanasia is when a doctor helps a person commit suicide, this is often called doctor assisted suicide. The reason this is up for debate is because people disagree with the fact that doctors are helping people commit suicide. Euthanasia is wrong in many ways.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    After examining all the relevant argument surrounding this topic, it was easy to formulate an opinion supporting voluntary euthanasia in limited circumstances. The contemporary thinker, Peter Singer provides a sound argument that outlines how voluntary euthanasia keeps with the ultimate objective of healthcare. When debating the morality of voluntary euthanasia, it is important to consider why it is morally impermissible to kill a human being. According to Singer, the fact that killing is considered wrong simply because a being is human is not a strong enough reason for it to morally wrong in all situations. This idea that human life is intrinsically valuable stems from religious ideals and is commonly defended using deontology (Singer, “Voluntary” 528).…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each person has the right to control his or her body and life and so should be able to determine at what time, in what way and by whose hand he or she will die. Death should be a private matter, with the patient making the decision and no one should have a right to interfere with their choice. If the patient is terminally ill, is suffering and in constant pain a patient should have the right to die if that is what they choose. I do not feel that society should have a say so when death should occur. When and if a decision needs to be made for euthanasia, whether passive or active, the matter should be a decision that is made by the individual.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is a serious issue in today’s society. Euthanasia is the act of relieving someone of his or her suffering by intentionally ending his or her life. Many people argue that euthanasia is beneficial to the person suffering as well as his or her family. On the other hand, many people argue that euthanasia is morally wrong. Overall, euthanasia is not beneficial to anyone, and the practice should be stopped for good.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Other factors include the desire to preserve dignity and personhood in the dying process and opposition to prolonging life by using sophisticated medical technology when it is recognized that care is futile. Closely related to self-determination is the principle of autonomy. This principle states that persons should have the right to make their own decisions about the course of their own lives whenever they can. By extension, they should also have the right to determine the course of their own dying as much as possible. The ethics of physician assisted suicide (PAS) continue to be debated.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this paper, we are going to present an analysis regarding medical ethics, specifically Euthanasia and we will try to describe the position of a Consequentialist, Deontologist, and Virtue ethics philosophers and what their decision will be in reference to this dilemma. Subsequently we will compare and choose which position is the most appropriate to handle this ethical dilemma and explain why the others positions do not work. We will do our best to present enough evidence to support the reasoning behind our selection. Anything that involves a decision about ending a person’s life regardless of the circumstances, presents ethical dilemmas on how or why this can be done or even worse accepted.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If death is destined due to sickness, then the patient should be able to decide whether they want a peaceful death or a painful death. Patients who are suffering from an incurable disease, or any kind of disability do not deserve to suffer and legalizing euthanasia can help cure their suffering since not many want to live after a period of time when the patient and the doctor knows that it is too late and nothing further can be done to improve the patient’s condition, or relieve their pain. She could not end her life on her own terms, so instead she suffered: a crippling stroke; massive blood loss after an angiogram; dialysis; constant hospitalization; and mistreatment by staff. Month after month, she sank further into despair (Hayes). This excerpt is from an article where its author Mathew Hayes describes the condition and suffering that his grandmother had to go through before she reached the end of it.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays