Peter Singer Voluntary Euthanasia Analysis

Great Essays
The evolution of modern medicine has dramatically lengthened the life expectancy of human beings. In many cases, the quality of those life years are satisfactory, and elderly individuals enjoy life. However, there are also many people experience terminal diseases or tragic accidents that reduce their quality of life to the point they no longer want to live. In these cases, patients may plead with their doctor to end their life. Naturally, a physician ending the life of her patient is morally conflicting. One great thinker that has examined the morality of what has become known as voluntary euthanasia is Professor Peter Singer. Singer, in general, believes that voluntary euthanasia is morally permissible and goes to great lengths supporting his viewpoint. Despite his well-supported opinion, there are other thinkers that disagree with his moral reasoning. Each of those philosophers explains in detail the flaws …show more content…
After examining all the relevant argument surrounding this topic, it was easy to formulate an opinion supporting voluntary euthanasia in limited circumstances. The contemporary thinker, Peter Singer provides a sound argument that outlines how voluntary euthanasia keeps with the ultimate objective of healthcare. When debating the morality of voluntary euthanasia, it is important to consider why it is morally impermissible to kill a human being. According to Singer, the fact that killing is considered wrong simply because a being is human is not a strong enough reason for it to morally wrong in all situations. This idea that human life is intrinsically valuable stems from religious ideals and is commonly defended using deontology (Singer, “Voluntary” 528). In deontology, the outcome of an action justifies the action itself.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Since there isn 't any closing difference, active euthanasia is as morally justified as passive euthanasia. The argument that Rachel proposed fails to be effective and persuasive. Peter Singer reasons that we have an important obligation to secure and promote the “essentials of human well-being.” This is an aggregable statement, because it is our moral obligation to lend a helping hand to save a life.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay, I will contend that Brock’s argument in favor of the moral permissibility of voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) is sound and that Brock offers persuasive responses to the objection that (A) VAE is an act which involves the deliberate killing of an innocent person and (B) the deliberate killing of an innocent person is always morally wrong. To achieve this, I will begin by summarizing Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE. Then, I will synthesize the objection to Brock’s argument and Brock’s subsequent responses. Finally, I will describe why I find Brock’s responses persuasive. Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE can be constructed as follows: (1) VAE is supported by the “values of patient well-being…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For James Rachels, as Barcalow says on page 252 of MP, “letting someone die is often no better from a moral point of view than killing someone.” Rachels challenges the view that killing someone, that is, via active euthanasia is far worse than letting someone die, that is, via passive euthanasia. Rachels thinks that sometimes even letting someone die can be far more worse than just outright killing them. To demonstrate his argument, Rachels gives a thought-experiment addressing this issue.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is one of the most controversial topics and concerns in our society. It crosses many social, political, emotional and moral boundaries which is something many subjects cannot do all at once. This paper is meant to show my personal view on this controversial subject. Margaret Battin’s article ‘Euthanasia: The Fundamental Issues,’ discusses three moral principles that are typically used to argue for the legalization of euthanasia as a regulated practice. These three principles are; the Principle of Mercy, the Principle of (patient) Autonomy, and the Principle of Justice.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this paper, we are going to present an analysis regarding medical ethics, specifically Euthanasia and we will try to describe the position of a Consequentialist, Deontologist, and Virtue ethics philosophers and what their decision will be in reference to this dilemma. Subsequently we will compare and choose which position is the most appropriate to handle this ethical dilemma and explain why the others positions do not work. We will do our best to present enough evidence to support the reasoning behind our selection. Anything that involves a decision about ending a person’s life regardless of the circumstances, presents ethical dilemmas on how or why this can be done or even worse accepted.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Euthanasia be banned? The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, there are those who strongly disagree and with that in mind, I will explore just such a person. In his essay, "The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia," J. Gay-Williams presents what I would consider to be the 'Traditional View ' of euthanasia and the typical arguments against it. He runs through three rudiments that, in his opinion, an act must meet to be called euthanasia: 1)A life is taken; 2) The person whose life is taken is believed to be suffering from a disease or injury from which he cannot reasonably be expected to recover, and 3) The taking of the life must be deliberate and intentional. He had a variety of concerns: That euthanasia does violence to the natural goal of survival, it violates God 's commandments and acts against God who is the rightful owner of our body; it does violence to our dignity; mistaken diagnosis is possible; miracles happen; experimental procedures may be developed...…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of life and death has always been a concept that many people try to avoid, but what happens when a loved one becomes too ill to live? This question has given rise to the idea of euthanasia and Physician-assisted suicide, which although may seem similar, have very different properties. Although physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia both support the belief that one has the right to choose their own fate, the constant backlash in society has limited its practice resulting in the disappearance of a method which, although unorthodox, offer a relief to people suffering from deadly diseases. Euthanasia is “the intentional killing by an act of . . . a dependent human being for his or her benefit” (MCCL.org) and involves two different methods.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is it true that people think it’s not morally right to kill a person, but that it’s morally acceptable to let them die? James Rachels, in “Active and Passive Euthanasia,” argues that there is no moral difference between active and passive euthanasia. He believes that if passive euthanasia is permissible, then active euthanasia should also be. In medical ethics, the distinction between both euthanasias are highly controversial, yet passive euthanasia is accepted and practiced by a majority of doctors. Despite critical conditions to one’s medical case, the majority of people believe active killing is morally worse than letting one die.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This act is by no means an exception to this standard, as a person who has to ponder the mere thought of this as a possibility is faced with the ultimate dilemma of human existence, life or death. It should be common knowledge for everyone that a person’s greatest priority is themself. But the problem for many when facing this truth is that they fear that this will take away from the needs that others have, especially of those who are vulnerable and ill. The authors of the informative article “Physician Assisted Death” acknowledge this worry, in accordance to the possibility of ulterior motives that may come with a person deciding on assisted…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then I will utilize aspects of James Rachels paper, “The Morality of Euthanasia”, in order to illustrate how active euthanasia can be morally permissible. Afterward, I will explain some aspects of my argument that others might find fault in and refute…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Euthanasia is the intended killing of another person with the intention of ending an individuals suffering with their request. Euthanasia has three different decisions: Voluntary, Non-Voluntary, and Involuntary. Each of these decisions either have active or passive causes of death. Physician assisted suicide is when a physician provides the patient with the substance and/or tells them how to end their life with it. Along with giving them the substance, they are aware that the patient may commit suicide.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issue of euthanasia brings up the question of whether the preservation of life or the liberty or freedom to do what one pleases with his/her own body is most important. Euthanasia from its Greek origins meant ‘good death’. Killing somebody actively (active euthanasia) is illegal everywhere in the world and is different from letting someone die which is passive euthanasia. The following paragraphs takes an ethical view of euthanasia from the view of the consequentialist, deontologist and virtue ethicist.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Outline for Arguments on PAS and Euthanasia When addressing the matter of Euthanasia and PAS, “we must first acknowledge that figuring out the benefits and harms of permitting euthanasia or PAS is speculative at best” (Emanuel). As well, it is important to acknowledge the fact that, “no matter which social policy regarding euthanasia or PAS is adopted - legalization or maintaining the current policy of permitting them in individual cases - there will be both benefits and harms” (Emanuel). In this argument, it will be shown that legalizing Euthanasia and PAS within the United States, will help people, by allowing terminally ill patients to realize the end of a good death or, more accurately, a create a higher quality dying experience for them.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays