Margaret Battin Euthanasia Analysis

Improved Essays
Euthanasia is one of the most controversial topics and concerns in our society. It crosses many social, political, emotional and moral boundaries which is something many subjects cannot do all at once. This paper is meant to show my personal view on this controversial subject.
Margaret Battin’s article ‘Euthanasia: The Fundamental Issues,’ discusses three moral principles that are typically used to argue for the legalization of euthanasia as a regulated practice. These three principles are; the Principle of Mercy, the Principle of (patient) Autonomy, and the Principle of Justice. The principle of mercy states that suffering ought to be relieved. Unless the suffering will give rise to some overriding benefit, or unless the achievement of some benefit would be made impossible by relieving pain. (Battin, 225). In the case of Euthanasia this principle means that doctors ought to relieve pain if the patients “benefits” are being outweighed by the detriments. The principle of autonomy is the second principle discussed by Battin. This principle states that “one ought to respect a competent person’s choice.” (Battin, 226). A person must only do this however, if it will not cause them undue costs to themselves, if doing so will not violate other moral obligations, and if the person’s choice does not cause harm to others. (Battin, 226). This is
…show more content…
However, the fact that they were thought up is because those are things that are in the medical field without the acceptance of euthanasia as a current practice. As it currently stands doctors still feel the need to be cavaliers, are hasty in making decisions, insensitive to their patients, cover up medical blunders and self- interest and payoffs happen regardless. As I have said multiple times before in this paper, laws will be put in place just as any other new system has laws put in place for them. This does mean that people will not try to, and successfully break

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    It is clear that the utmost importance in any medical context is the relationship between the healthcare practitioner and the patient. The duty of a physician is to adhere to certain principles of medical ethics namely the principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. By examining the case study involving Dr. Nancy Morrison, one can observe that these principles are often ambiguous when referring to the issue of whether she committed voluntary active euthanasia or nonvoluntary active euthanasia. Thus, the thesis will aim to exemplify that ultimately Dr. Nancy Morrison was culpable for her actions. To give some context to the issue, Paul Mills was a 65-year-old individual suffering from terminal esophageal cancer.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay, I will contend that Brock’s argument in favor of the moral permissibility of voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) is sound and that Brock offers persuasive responses to the objection that (A) VAE is an act which involves the deliberate killing of an innocent person and (B) the deliberate killing of an innocent person is always morally wrong. To achieve this, I will begin by summarizing Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE. Then, I will synthesize the objection to Brock’s argument and Brock’s subsequent responses. Finally, I will describe why I find Brock’s responses persuasive. Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE can be constructed as follows: (1) VAE is supported by the “values of patient well-being…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will summarize James Rachel’s argument on active versus euthanasia, and explain the examples he has written about to further explain it. After that I will summarize Thomas Sullivan’s objection. And at the end I will state my stance and conclusion on the subject. Rachels argument is on the difference between active and passive euthanasia and if that is really a distinction that needs to be made. He states in his introduction that active euthanasia is never allowed but passive euthanasia is sometimes allowed.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is also argued that there is a distinction between “intending someone’s death and not intending but foreseeing it” (Vaughn, 2017). In active euthanasia, the physician is intending the patient death from the prescription pills or the injection of drugs. However, in passive euthanasia, the physician is not intending for death upon the patient. Instead, the physician only foresees the patient’s pending death as unfortunate side of effect of this situation. The physician does not intent death upon the patient, but rather understand that it is a possibility in the near future for the…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia or assisted suicide is constitutional because of the rights provided to us in the ninth and fourteenth amendments. In today’s society one of the biggest concerns for disabled rights organisations is that, if euthanasia is legalised, the “right to die”' will soon become a “duty to die” (Sanders). Euthanasia takes physicians and medicine beyond their fundamental roles of caring, healing and curing whenever possible (Somerville). The fourteenth amendment citizenship rights and equal protection of the laws…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this paper, we are going to present an analysis regarding medical ethics, specifically Euthanasia and we will try to describe the position of a Consequentialist, Deontologist, and Virtue ethics philosophers and what their decision will be in reference to this dilemma. Subsequently we will compare and choose which position is the most appropriate to handle this ethical dilemma and explain why the others positions do not work. We will do our best to present enough evidence to support the reasoning behind our selection. Anything that involves a decision about ending a person’s life regardless of the circumstances, presents ethical dilemmas on how or why this can be done or even worse accepted.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As autonomous beings with their own moral values, the rights of doctors who may be asked to assist must be considered. They are separate moral agents, with responsibility for their own actions, yet their autonomy totally escapes examination by proponents of euthanasia. Nurses too have an immediate interest in any legislation since they would sometimes be called on to assist in the administration of the drug intended to bring about death, as we understand they are in the Netherlands and…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I am going to talk about the topic of euthanasia. I will argue that active euthanasia is morally permissible in the case of a terminally ill patient who is going through unbearable amounts of pain. Furthermore, the focus of this paper will only be on this type of euthanasia; active euthanasia. However, in the first part of my essay I will not only define what active euthanasia is but I will explain how it differs from other types of euthanasia such as physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Controversies have been revolving around the reckless outcomes in the legality of euthanasia. Also known as mercy killing, euthanasia is the implementation of dismissing a life with a terminal illness or intolerable suffering. In the levels of morality and professionalism, it is ludicrous to assist termination of one’s life, especially in a passive or involuntary way. Legalization of euthanasia has proven higher levels of convictions in non-voluntary euthanasia. Thus, the United States as well as many other countries around the world, have developed a negative reputation from controversial cases surrounding assisted suicides.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    After examining all the relevant argument surrounding this topic, it was easy to formulate an opinion supporting voluntary euthanasia in limited circumstances. The contemporary thinker, Peter Singer provides a sound argument that outlines how voluntary euthanasia keeps with the ultimate objective of healthcare. When debating the morality of voluntary euthanasia, it is important to consider why it is morally impermissible to kill a human being. According to Singer, the fact that killing is considered wrong simply because a being is human is not a strong enough reason for it to morally wrong in all situations. This idea that human life is intrinsically valuable stems from religious ideals and is commonly defended using deontology (Singer, “Voluntary” 528).…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issue of euthanasia brings up the question of whether the preservation of life or the liberty or freedom to do what one pleases with his/her own body is most important. Euthanasia from its Greek origins meant ‘good death’. Killing somebody actively (active euthanasia) is illegal everywhere in the world and is different from letting someone die which is passive euthanasia. The following paragraphs takes an ethical view of euthanasia from the view of the consequentialist, deontologist and virtue ethicist.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another key argument, be it in support of autonomy, holds the ability to be autonomous as unconditionally valuable, therefore implying a duty to preserve a patient 's ability to choose. On the…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia: An Ethical Dilemma Essay Throughout our lives, we are faced with hardships and dilemmas that we must somehow resolve or overcome. Influenced by one’s world view, the decisions that are made can have a significant impact on one’s life, some even life altering. The concept of Euthanasia which is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma (Oxford Dictionary) brings up many different opinions depending on a person’s world view. I will examine the ethical dilemma of Euthanasia based the Christian world view, how it would be resolved and compare it to other worldviews.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Euthanasia There is always some type of ethical dilemma happening every minute on this world. Whether is choosing between personal behaviors or medical decisions. In this case I will explained my point of view on Euthanasia. I will compared with other worldview’s options and what they might think is the correct way to act when it comes to ending someone’s life as an act of mercy. Ethical Dilemma…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Euthanasia Is Wrong

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Euthanasia is close to the same factor as Lethal Injection, which is why it is so wrong in so many people’s eyes. The right of a terminally ill person to avoid excruciating pain and embrace a timely and dignified death bears the sanction of history and is implicit in the concept of ordered liberty. The exercise of this right is as central to personal autonomy and bodily integrity as rights safeguarded by the Court's decisions relating to marriage, family relationships, procreation, contraception, child rearing and the refusal or termination of…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays