Outline For Euthanasia Research Paper

Improved Essays
Outline for Arguments on PAS and Euthanasia
When addressing the matter of Euthanasia and PAS, “we must first acknowledge that figuring out the benefits and harms of permitting euthanasia or PAS is speculative at best” (Emanuel). As well, it is important to acknowledge the fact that, “no matter which social policy regarding euthanasia or PAS is adopted - legalization or maintaining the current policy of permitting them in individual cases - there will be both benefits and harms” (Emanuel). In this argument, it will be shown that legalizing Euthanasia and PAS within the United States, will help people, by allowing terminally ill patients to realize the end of a good death or, more accurately, a create a higher quality dying experience for them.
…show more content…
Regarding the topic of ‘death with dignity’, the legalization of PAS and euthanasia offers terminally ill patients self-autonomy, and as will be shown, gives them comfort, confidence, and closure. A person’s last moments on earth should not be spent needlessly suffering from severe physical pain. Terminally ill patients become dependent on other people for their nutrition, hydration, and hygiene (Levin). Instead of spending time in discomfort, the terminally ill should be at rest. The process deserves to be joyful and respectful. As studies show, “many terminally ill patients fear that as their condition progresses they will lose physical function, mental function, and independence. They will lose their sense of autonomy and their ability to enjoy life” (Levin). Additionally, depression and hopelessness, rather than pain, are the primary factors motivating patients’ who wish to die. (Levin). Terminally ill patients suffering from depression are four times more likely to desire death than those not suffering from depression. Finally, a 2002 study shows that the three most common end-of-life concerns for patients choosing PAS and euthanasia, were, “loss of autonomy, a decreasing ability to participate in activities that made life …show more content…
It’s been over 27 years, and thus far, the benefits of legal PAS and euthanasia are clear: (1) the legislature has created safeguards and regulation for people requesting PAS, and, (2) the statute provides a higher quality experience in death. In addressing the first issue, keep in mind, regulation is important, as what are known as “vulnerable groups”, may fall victim to outside pressures withem safeguards. Vulnerable groups such as those pressured by economic interests, family interests, mental disorders, etc. (Steinbock). The law states, “if an Oregon resident has less than six months to live and is mentally competent, she can request that a physician prescribe her drugs that will cause a quick and painless death” (Gill). Furthermore, “Oregon requires that a patient be referred to a psychiatrist or psychologist for treatment if the prescribing or consulting physician is concerned that the patient’s judgment is impaired by a mental disorder” (Warnes). Thanks to the protections offered by the ODDA, “ [...] fears about the abuse of vulnerable groups, such as the elderly, poor, uneducated, or minorities, [do not] seem to have materialised” (Steinbock). However, while this is true, does this statute legitimately help create a higher quality dying experience? Well, “according to the Fifth Annual Report on Oregon’s Death with

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    PAS opponents believe that it is morally unacceptable for a physician to assist in ending a person’s life because it a moral profession and allowing a person to request that the physician make the decision to end someone’s life isn’t morally right. However, the Oregon law makes it very clear that the only role that a physician is to determine whether the person has a terminal disease and if the person is competent which are both medical judgements and does not require the physician to make any moral judgements. Then the physician is to assist the person with the decision that they have made themselves and how best to cope with this decision. Opponents also argue that as long as a physician is knowingly involved in the process which involves suicide that it violates the medical duty to promote health. However, a physician’s duty to promote health isn’t their only duty because it would be ethically wrong for a physician to release a person from their care because there is no treatment for their illness.…

    • 2296 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pas Vs Euthanasia

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Individuals who are for legalization of PAS believe that a competent patient should be to choose the timing and manner of their death. There is the belief that a terminally ill patient has the right to refuse specific medical treatment plans if it only prolongs their death. Moreover, if an individual’s quality of life is hindered with consequences such as a loss of independence, loss of self and functional capacities to the point that there is an inability to relieve the suffering, then PAS is viewed as an act of compassion. Society believes in preserving life, illegal PAS excessively limits personal liberties by disallowing a terminally ill person with a strong desire to end their life. Lastly, more transparency between patient and physicians could promote better end of life…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Oregon Public Health Division acknowledges that, “As in previous years, the three most frequently mentioned end-of-life concerns were: loss of autonomy (91.4%), decreasing ability to participate in activities that made life enjoyable (86.7%), and loss of dignity (71.4%)” to show exactly how many people struggled with the thought of losing these things. Many individuals find it scary that they will get to a point where life will no longer be enjoyable because of their illness. People want to be able to respond to life and the things happening around until they die and some people may not end up having that choice. The family of the sufferer will help make sure the patient makes their decision in the right state of mind and they continue to be in that state at the time they die. Brody writes, “Presumably the family will help to assure that the patient 's choice is truly voluntary and that the patient has appropriately sought out other care options before concluding that death through suicide is the only effective way to avoid further suffering”, showing that the choice for Physician Assisted Suicide is usually an option the family approves of as well.…

    • 2128 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well-known writer, Annabelle Gurwitch, in her article, Death Without Dignity, describes the effects of allowing euthanasia in all states of the United States. Euthanasia is not accepted in all states as of today. Physician aid in dying, or assisted suicide, is legal in the states of Vermont, Oregon, Montana, and Washington. The key difference between euthanasia and physician aid in dying is who administers the lethal dose of medication. Gurwitch’s purpose of this article is to persuade her readers to the benefits of allowing euthanasia and to encourage them to make this a “normal” way of leaving this world.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Recent stories in the news have posed this controversial question: should terminally ill patients have the right to end their own lives? Empathetic stories of terminally ill patients’ last wishes have captured attention of the media and created a controversial debate on the ethics and morals of physician assisted suicide, otherwise known as PAS. Some claim that PAS is inhumane and unethical, while others insist that it is a given right to anybody under such extreme circumstances. In his article, “Physician-Assisted Suicide Is Always Wrong,” Ryan T. Anderson attempts to convey to citizens and policymakers that legalizing PAS across the country would be a grave mistake. However, Anderson’s argument is weak due to a series of logical fallacies…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States, the controversial topic of physician assisted suicide has been heavily debated. Should it be legal to terminate one’s own life, with the aid of a physician, because they have been afflicted by a terminal illness? One should have the option to not suffer months of agonizing pain, but leave their life with dignity. The only states that legally allow a person of a terminal illness to have a physician assisted death are Oregon, Vermont and Washington. If passed, the End of Life Option Act, modeled after the Death with Dignity Act of Oregon, would give the people of California who have been deemed terminally ill the right to a physician assisted death.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vice versa, a patient whose family pressures her to choose life when it would be the better option to have PAS. Additionally, there is a moral distinction between killing and letting die. Currently, some “physician assisted suicides” are legal such as a doctor forgoing treatment upon a patient’s request or terminal sedation, where medical staff gives the patient pain medication until she dies. Thus, why are some methods of PAS allowed but euthanasia is not? Velleman argues because the option would harm the patient but perhaps it is more an issue of…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The topics of Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide are troubling ones for many. Some believe that it is immoral to kill off their loved ones, some support it, and others are not quite sure what to think. Euthanasia is defined as the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering from an incurable illness; Physician Assisted Suicide is defined as the voluntary termination of one’s life using lethal substances with the help of a doctor, directly or indirectly. A doctor gives the patient suffering from an incurable illness a lethal injection which then induces the painless death. Right now only 5 states states have legalized euthanasia and assisted suicide.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The controversy concerning a new method of death, Physician Assisted Suicide, has provoked a social, legal, and a massive medical debate. Nearly two decades ago, Oregon declared its legalization for the assistance of lethal doses of medication to help terminally ill patients end their lives. Several other states were subsequent to this movement, such as Washington, Vermont, and Montana. Since then, oppositional views and disagreements on this topic have been brought up in court to be legalized for the suffering of patients who are unavoidably assured to death. The legalization of PAS in these states should be revoked because of the many flaws this movement contains.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is essential to examine all options and discussion regarding the matter, because although physician-assisted suicide can potentially be a very rewarding experience for a patient and their family as well as allows the dying patient control over their life, there is as much reason for it to be a wholly immoral act. However, discussion of end-of-life decisions need not stop at whether or not physician-assisted suicide should be legalized. Instead, it should be extended to the concept of palliative care. Improved care at end-of-life may be enough to both hypothetically change certain motivations and factors for the desire for assisted suicide, but also addresses the positive points of the argument for physician-assisted suicide without promoting assisted…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death With Dignity Act

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pereira’s article “Legalizing euthanasia or assisted suicide: the illusion of safeguards and controls” he discusses the downfalls and weak points in the PAS movement. He addresses the increased tolerance of euthanasia and/or PAS in the select states and countries where PAS is currently legal. It shifts from, “People who are terminally ill, to euthanasia of those who are chronically ill; from euthanasia for physical illness, to euthanasia for mental illness; from euthanasia for mental illness, to euthanasia for psychological distress or mental suffering—and now to euthanasia simply if a person is over the age of 70 and ‘tired of living’ (Pereira).”…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia have been a huge ethical conflict throughout time. PAS and Euthanasia has been one of the most controversial topic in the health care industry. As future Health Care Administrators and patients, we need to be aware of the state laws, moral and ethical issues that arise with administering PAS to occur in our hospitals. We need to analyze each case carefully and look into the specifics without rushing to a decision. PAS is often confused with Euthanasia however the two terminologies are quite different.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the world, many hundreds of people have been diagnosed with terminal illnesses. Some of these illnesses are very painful and can cause suffering to those diagnosed until they eventually pass away. Today, a few countries have legalized a method to circumvent this suffering; it is known as physician/euthanasia assisted suicide (EAS). In America, a handful of states have legalized this new medical approach but there is still a lot of opposition for moral and religious reasons. Most believe it gives doctors far too much power or that doctors should only be allowed to extend and protect life rather than end it.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine your terminally ill grandmother lying in a hospital bed, slowly dying of cancer, and the only two words she continues to repeat are “kill me.” If physician-assisted suicide, or PAS, was legal in the United States, loved ones would no longer have to suffer. In order to allow terminally ill patients to die with dignity, the U.S. government needs to legalize PAS. PAS should be legalized because it grants patients the right to a respectable death, the process ensures patients are competent enough to request it, and US physicians and AMA board members approve of it.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A patient who is suffering has the legal right to die with guidance, counseling and support from their physician, they ultimately have the decision whether or not they want to take their life. Sullivan and Taylor emphasize that, “Neither government nor religious institutions should impose their own values on others, especially on those who are not causing harm. As an option in end-of-life care, PAS would allow terminally ill, mentally competent individuals to retain dignity and bodily integrity in the face of unbearable pain and suffering,” (54). There comes to a point in the patients’ life when they know they have had enough and in a stable mind set choose to die. Patient’s do not become incapable of making choices; yet have a clear view of their mental and physical wellbeing.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics