A Moral Defense Of Oregon's Physician-Assisted Suicide Law: Case Analysis

Great Essays
In Michael Gill’s article “A moral defense of Oregon’s physician-assisted suicide law” he defends the law against two objections by providing arguments from opponents of PAS and proponents of PAS. The first objection that Gill defends is “that it is intrinsically wrong for someone to kill herself” (2005). The second objection is that “it is intrinsically wrong for physicians to assist someone in killing herself” (Gill, 2005). The physician assisted suicide law allows terminally ill residents of Oregon who are mentally competent and have less than six months to live to request a doctor to prescribe a medication that will cause a quick and painless death. In the first part of the article Gill argues that it is not intrinsically wrong for a terminal …show more content…
He then goes on to explain big decisions as choices you make that will change the course of your life depending on the choice you made where little decisions don’t change the course of your life. Gill sees autonomy as respecting a person’s ability to make big decisions allowing them to determine the course of their life. Although he still believes a person should make as many little decisions as they can the greater value of autonomy lies in the ability to make big decisions. He goes on to say that although people who qualify for PAS may be able to make little decisions for weeks or months to come, the ability to make big decisions may be all but gone because of the illness that is eating away at their mental and physical abilities. But a person who qualifies for PAS will be able to make one more big decision, and that is how and when they will die. So in regards to the opponent’s argument allowing a healthy person access to PAS would be violating the most important value of autonomy because a healthy person still has the ability to make big decisions. Also with this outlook the difference between self-slavery and people with terminal illness is more clear because a slave may be able to make little decisions but because of her contract she is unable to make big decisions that will …show more content…
PAS opponents believe that it is morally unacceptable for a physician to assist in ending a person’s life because it a moral profession and allowing a person to request that the physician make the decision to end someone’s life isn’t morally right. However, the Oregon law makes it very clear that the only role that a physician is to determine whether the person has a terminal disease and if the person is competent which are both medical judgements and does not require the physician to make any moral judgements. Then the physician is to assist the person with the decision that they have made themselves and how best to cope with this decision. Opponents also argue that as long as a physician is knowingly involved in the process which involves suicide that it violates the medical duty to promote health. However, a physician’s duty to promote health isn’t their only duty because it would be ethically wrong for a physician to release a person from their care because there is no treatment for their illness. Someone with a terminal disease cannot be made healthy so the physicians main role would be to reduce suffering. However, the physician can only reduce suffering by ways that the person has consented. Opponents to PAS agree that physicians should reduce suffering of competent patients but state that reducing suffering should never be done with PAS because they believe a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS), has been a moral dilemma in the hot seat since the passing of Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act in 1997. All throughout the US, states have been trying to pass acts that allow people to die with dignity using PAS, the most recent being Colorado. PAS is a conflicting topic because it causes concern if the choice is morally ethical for the patient and for the others making these decisions like, doctors, psychologist, and other family members. PAS can cause conflict among religion and personal beliefs but it should be seen as an individual 's right not a communal right. The article referenced within this paper is “The Role of and Challenge for Psychologist in Physician Assisted Suicide” written by Shara M. Johnson,…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pas Vs Euthanasia

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Individuals who are for legalization of PAS believe that a competent patient should be to choose the timing and manner of their death. There is the belief that a terminally ill patient has the right to refuse specific medical treatment plans if it only prolongs their death. Moreover, if an individual’s quality of life is hindered with consequences such as a loss of independence, loss of self and functional capacities to the point that there is an inability to relieve the suffering, then PAS is viewed as an act of compassion. Society believes in preserving life, illegal PAS excessively limits personal liberties by disallowing a terminally ill person with a strong desire to end their life. Lastly, more transparency between patient and physicians could promote better end of life…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong” In “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong”, author Ryan T. Anderson uses the ethical argument to ascertain that physician-assisted suicide is always wrong. On this controversial topic, the author is appealing to a philosophy: physician assisted suicide doesn’t progress the medical community; but rather it undermines the doctor’s overwhelming ethical responsibility to treat the sick all the way until the very end. In this piece, Anderson genuinely promotes the idea that our society would genuinely put the medical community in danger, as well as possibly put the lives of terminally ill people if our nation expanded laws allowing physician-assisted suicide throughout the entire country. Anderson believes it is unethical due to the digressive impact it has on the medical community in general.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When healing a patient is no longer possible, death is imminent and suffering is unbearable the physician's role should shift from healing the patient to relieving their suffering according to their wishes (M. Angell). With that being said, physician assisted suicide should be left as a last resort to be used when all other options have been expended. Keeping someone alive against their will and forcing someone to suffer is as much of a crime as taking someone's life without their consent (F. Girsh). Without PAS patients are subjected to unwanted medical treatment or completely abandoned altogether. Medical technology has advanced incredibly over the years but for the terminally ill it only prolongs suffering (E. De La Torre).…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ryan T. Anderson's article titled “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong” begins with Anderson setting the stage of the idea of Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) being introduced with stories of patients diagnosed with terrible diseases. Anderson describes the act of eighteen states considering legalizing PAS a “grave mistake”, and describes a more merciful alternative of doctors giving patients the means to ease their pain as they await their demise. Anderson also quotes Victoria Reggie Kennedy, who believes that most people would prefer a death surrounded by loved ones, and a PAS would be cold, unloving and extreme. Anderson also claims that this would be contrary to the Hippocratic Oath and that nobody should be legally allowed to kill…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The routine practice of physician assisted suicide raises serious ethical and other concern. Legislation would undermine the patient's physical relationship and the trust necessary to sustain it; alter the medical profession role in society; and endanger the value our society places in lives of disabled, incompetent and vulnerable…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Controversy of Physician Assisted Suicide According to the Constitution every person has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The statement means no one needs permission to live and each person has the right to do what make him or her happy even if it means dying (Bowden 36). There are many people throughout the United States that believe Physician Assisted Suicide is wrong, however, there are also many people who believe it is a human right. The controversy of PAS can be understood by learning what it is and where it occurs, why it should be legal, and why it should not be legal.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some argue that PAS is ethical. Often this is argued on the grounds that PAS may be a rational choice for a person who is choosing to die to escape unbearable suffering. Furthermore, the physician's duty to alleviate suffering may, at times, justify the act of providing assistance with suicide. This relies a great deal on the notion of individual autonomy, recognizing the right of competent people to choose for themselves the course of their life, including how it will…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is the voluntary termination of a person’s life with the assistance of a physician in a controlled environment allows a quick, painless, and dignified death for those suffering from terminal illnesses. The arguments against physician-assisted suicide are ineffective because it gives terminally ill patients the right a dignified death. Today, five states have legalized physician-assisted suicide, sparing families in those states from watching their loved ones go through unbearable suffering and pain. The question of assisted suicide, and later physician-assisted suicide, has been long debated.…

    • 2317 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I. Physician-assisted suicide, under various names and colloquial definitions, has been a documented ethical issue for centuries – not to mention an undocumented ethical issue since the hypothetical dawn of life. By common understanding, physician-assisted suicide is death either directly or indirectly permitted or carried out by a physician. In simple terms, an “out” is provided. For this reason, it is often associated with chronic pain or terminal illness. Suicide where the doctor in charge is directly involved is perhaps the first situation which comes to mind when one thinks of euthanasia.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regarding physician assisted suicide, also known as PAS, J. David Velleman argues that a PAS policy could be harmful to patients and thus, we should not have a policy. In his work, “Against the Right to Die”, Velleman is not arguing for the morality of PAS, but rather against a PAS public policy. His argument focuses on the harm on a patient that PAS can have by adding the burden to opt for PAS. By giving more options, a PAS policy can push a patient to choose death. Without the option of PAS, Velleman says, a patient can continue to live by default.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide Essay Outline I. Introduction - There is a controversial debate throughout the United States for the last decade regarding physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill patients, many believe having a Doctor prescribe a self-administered lethal drug to a patient is diminishing the value of life. While others believe this method should be the patients’ right to choice when the pain and suffering from a life threatening illness should cease. II. Main Point # 1 - Will Physician-…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the many ethical dilemmas surrounding health care today is physician assisted suicide. Many will misinterpret this as Euthanasia because they both accomplish the same goal, causing the death of a person. However, physician assisted suicide is different because of the way that death is accomplished. Boudreau and Somerville (2014) explain that, “In assisted suicide, the person takes the death-inducing product; in euthanasia, another individual administers it” (p. 2). The physician in the case of physician assisted suicide is removed from the actual act of death.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although more than half of the United States does not believe in legalizing physician-assisted suicide, five states have already legalized this assistance, which is causing a huge ethical debate in the medical world (“State-by-State Guide to Physician-Assisted Suicide,” n.d.). People who are in favor of physician-assisted suicide are arguing for the respect of autonomy, individual liberty, and compassion. In contrast, people who are not in favor of physician-assisted suicide are arguing for the sanctity of life, fear of abuse, and professional integrity. Physician assisted suicide should be considered unethical in healthcare because of the potential for abuse and the duty of a healthcare provider is to do no harm and maintain life. The principle of non-maleficence and the theory of deontology support my argument against physician-assisted suicide by providing evidence on why it should be considered unethical.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the controversial act known as the physician aid-in-dying (PAD) challenges us to question our ethical, religious, and cultural values or beliefs. Although it is tragic and perceived as morally inappropriate, suicide is sometimes the only answer. In certain cases this act is a way to end excruciating pain and suffering through modern medicine. The state of Oregon passed a law known as the Death with Dignity Act in 1994. PAD is defined as “a practice in which a physician provides a competent, terminally ill patient with a prescription for a lethal dose of medication, upon the patient 's request, which the patient intends to use to end his or their own life” (Braddock, and Tonelli).…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics