Physician Assisted Suicide Is Always Wrong Analysis

793 Words 4 Pages
“Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong”

In “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong”, author Ryan T. Anderson uses the ethical argument to ascertain that physician-assisted suicide is always wrong. On this controversial topic, the author is appealing to a philosophy: physician assisted suicide doesn’t progress the medical community; but rather it undermines the doctor’s overwhelming ethical responsibility to treat the sick all the way until the very end. In this piece, Anderson genuinely promotes the idea that our society would genuinely put the medical community in danger, as well as possibly put the lives of terminally ill people if our nation expanded laws allowing physician-assisted suicide throughout the entire country. Anderson believes it is unethical due to the digressive impact it has on the medical community in general. Anderson’s position is that it is a doctor’s position in society is to uphold his duties to treat the sick, to progress and direct the institution of education and research, and then follow up on that particular case of illness with the most recent and updated care all the way until the very end.
…show more content…
I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect” (Anderson, Ryan n.p.).This is a vital statement of Anderson’s writing, and a crucial piece of why this writer believes it is unethical and unprogressive for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia to exist. Anderson believes that if the philosophy of euthanasia was put into full affect it would endanger anyone who is sick: the “weak and the venerable.” He believes that doctors and the people who decides who lives or dies such as judges have an emphatic responsibility to protect

Related Documents