Analysis Of Physician Assisted Suicide Is Always Wrong By Ryan T. Anderson

Superior Essays
Ryan T. Anderson's article titled “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong” begins with Anderson setting the stage of the idea of Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) being introduced with stories of patients diagnosed with terrible diseases. Anderson describes the act of eighteen states considering legalizing PAS a “grave mistake”, and describes a more merciful alternative of doctors giving patients the means to ease their pain as they await their demise. Anderson also quotes Victoria Reggie Kennedy, who believes that most people would prefer a death surrounded by loved ones, and a PAS would be cold, unloving and extreme. Anderson also claims that this would be contrary to the Hippocratic Oath and that nobody should be legally allowed to kill …show more content…
The alternative way is Euthanasia, which Anderson describes as, “the intentional killing of a patient by doctor”. Anderson claims that this can only lead to Euthanasia because if we are to be logically compassionate, we can’t discriminate the option from patients who are unable to administer the deadly drugs themselves on account of being handicapped in some way. Anderson also states that there is no constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide. Anderson then again quotes an article from The Heritage Foundation Backgrounder, which states four reasons that PAS is a bad idea. The article claims first that it endangers the weak, despite failing safeguards with evidence that in three countries in Europe, “thousands” of cases have been found of doctor’s killing patients without a request. The second claim is that PAS corrupts the use of medicine as a tool for healing, and warps it into a tool for causing harm, further damaging the trust between doctor and patient. The third claim is that it would damage intergenerational family relationships, causing society to view the elderly as weak and …show more content…
Then we can accurately assess whether or not the patient is in their right mind to be making the decision. I believe with those steps in place, we can avoid any illegal euthanizing being made by

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The first contains the opinion of a doctor who opposes euthanasia (Opinion 2.21 – Euthanasia). The doctor stresses that euthanizing someone is equivalent to abandoning them. Even when a person’s condition seems impossible to fix, there is still hope. Thus, euthanizing them would discard all of the remaining hope. Also, since the medical professionals performing the operation are ending lives, they are forced to assume unique responsibility.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fear of losing control is a patient’s final push to euthanasia, but many still question the morals of the practice. Studies show that the average person fears the future especially if he or she is ill. The main reason for the decision could be the emotions someone goes through when terminally ill (Gamond 4). Assisted suicide is where doctors give patients the medicine, but the patient administers the medicine to themselves at their own pace (“8 Main Pros and Cons”). Active Euthanasia is the practice of injecting a patient with a lethal dose of medication for primary intention of ending the patient’s life (Meier, Emmons, etal 1).…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rationality Research Paper

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Voluntary euthanasia is the intentional termination of a terminally ill patient’s life with the patient’s consent. Most opponents of Euthanasia utilise the DDE to demonstrate the immorality of Voluntary Euthanasia. This is done by ignoring the consent of the patient, and judging the act from the perspective of the physician involved in aiding the patient. Opponents claim that with or without the patient’s/agent’s consent, the physician’s intent is to kill the patient. Since killing another person is inherently wrong , Euthanasia is thus immoral.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Callahan feels that the law misleads the patient to feel they have autonomy thinking that the active euthanasia will help them reach the good life. The third point put pressure of the medical professional to achieve what the patient thinks is the good life. This point makes a patient think, escaping from personal life that is causing suffering instead of the pain from the sick of the body. Callahan feels that active euthanasia has no justifiable reason on why it would be right to legalize killing one another. Callahan objects to Rachels and Brock’s arguments for euthanasia.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nonmaleficence And Suicide

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages

    37). Another debatable principle when discussing physician assisted suicide, nonmaleficence is the main argument used to dispute its righteousness and virtue. Opponents argue that taking someone’s life is considered causing them harm and is one of the most harmful things to do to another person. They claim that physician assisted suicide violates the Hippocratic oath of healthcare professionals by essentially harming or killing another person. But in cases of physician assisted suicide, doctors are only providing the patients with lethal drugs, who then administer it to themselves.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a doctor performs the final act (e.g., an injection), it is euthanasia; if the patient performs the final act himself (e.g., ingesting pills), it is assisted suicide” (MCCFL). Euthanasia is generally misled in correlation to assisted physician suicide in which a person wants to end their suffering because of unbearable pain that they are experiencing, but unable to function on doing so and no more hopes besides dying peacefully. However, there are some individuals who believe and anticipate that Euthanasia should not be acknowledge and legalize because they see it as ruthless, and inhumane. Euthanasia has many definitions and interpretation depending on the perspective of the person. The ongoing debate is likely to focus on whether Euthanasia is good or not to an individual…

    • 1124 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong” In “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong”, author Ryan T. Anderson uses the ethical argument to ascertain that physician-assisted suicide is always wrong. On this controversial topic, the author is appealing to a philosophy: physician assisted suicide doesn’t progress the medical community; but rather it undermines the doctor’s overwhelming ethical responsibility to treat the sick all the way until the very end. In this piece, Anderson genuinely promotes the idea that our society would genuinely put the medical community in danger, as well as possibly put the lives of terminally ill people if our nation expanded laws allowing physician-assisted suicide throughout the entire country. Anderson believes it is unethical due to the digressive impact it has on the medical community in general. Anderson’s position is that it is a doctor’s position in society is to uphold his duties to treat the sick, to progress and direct the institution of education and research, and then follow up on that particular case of illness with the most recent and updated care all the way until the very end.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Active and Passive Euthanasia The purpose of the first essay written by James Rachel is to argue that the active euthanasia should be used rather than passive euthanasia. Euthanasia is the act of allowing or killing painlessly someone with incurable and painful disease to die. The author opposes the idea that it is permissible to stop the treatment and allow the patient to die, but it is not allowable…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Agreeing to the process of PAS, shows terminally ill patients their live is not worth living. PAS communicates to the vulnerable, that by poor example, other patients will choose death as a benefit, over life that has become miserable to them. Physicians should not give up completely on the patient if their is no possible cure. The patient should die naturally with emotional support, be provided with a sufficient amount of pain control and keep a well communicated relationship with their physician and family. Advocates of Physician-assisted suicide propose that mercy killing is required because patients with a terminal illness, undergo unmanageable suffering.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    O’Neill also argues that making euthanasia legal would replace “love with law”. If it is legalized, euthanasia can no longer be considered mercy killing. It would replace a decision that should be made with the consultation of family and doctors with one that is monitored by the government and death-sanctioning lawyers. Ultimately, a government does not care about the patient’s life, adding them into the equation would diminish the love and compassion a terminally ill patient should feel at the end of their life. Legalizing euthanasia would only cause more pain as it would introduce more unneeded stress to the patient.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays