Is Euthanasia Wrong

Improved Essays
Almost every person on this earth has a heard of the term euthanasia to some degree. Even though there are many different forms of euthanasia the most common is when a person askes to be killed in a painless manor most times because of an untreatable illness. For most people there decision on whether it’s right or wrong have to do with their own morals or religion. In this paper I will be taking a stand on whether or not I feel euthanasia is right, while also showing how ethics places a part in it. Out of the many different theories such as Virtue Ethics, Natural Law Theory, Utilitarianism, or Deontological Ethical Theory ext. I feel that the utilitarianism theory and consequentialism would best explain euthanasia from ethical stand point. …show more content…
In this paper I will present euthanasia from both sides, those who agree with it and oppose it, while also presenting my own opinion. The reason I feel that utilitarianism and euthanasia intertwine is because utilitarianism involves actions that benefit society. If anyone has been asked to commit euthanasia the one question they have is whether it is right or wrong? To fully find out whether it is right or wrong you must first understand the different forms of euthanasia. There is no defined answer to this question. When looking at it thruw the eyes of the utilitarianism theory most will automatically say it is right, but they would be somewhat wrong. One reason why it may be looked at as right is because as long as the end result is good then the action by which the person got the result is also good. One case where it will be looked at as right is voluntary euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia is simply when a person askes to be killed & wants to be killed. As you can see the end result will be good, because the person’s wishes are being fulfilled. While on the other hand if a person was committing non-voluntary euthanasia then the result would not necessarily be good since we would …show more content…
Another way to explain euthanasia in an ethical form would be to take a personal stand on the matter. I personally feel that euthanasia is not morally right. Even though utilitarianism says it’s good other theories and philosophers have greatly disagreed. In particular Samuel von Pufenforf believed in the duty theory. The duty theory states that “we are morally obligated to act in accordance with a certain set of principles and rules regardless of outcome.” Proponents of the duty theory like myself believe that our moral obligations fall into three categories, which are our duty to God, our duty to our self, and duties to others. In the case of euthanasia it might not disobey the duties to others in some cases but it is morally wrong because it fails to obey our duty to god and especially our duty to oneself. These three duties were made for people to use them as a checklist to determine if something is morally correct. They are to be followed just as the Ten Commandments

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This begs the question, “is it right to kill another to deliver them from their misery”. . Medically, euthanasia is the right choice and depicted as an act of grace. Ethically, it’s wrong and seen as a nefarious exercise. Euthanasia is seen as a way to ease the pain, but it doesn't change the fact its murder. This practice is improper and considered a stain on modern medical science.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many different of points of view when it comes to the topic and discussion of euthanasia. Euthanasia is the ‘mercy killing’ of someone in order to relieve some type of great pain or suffering. (White 148) Conducting my opinion on this topic was rather difficult, because there are many different circumstances to consider when arguing for or against euthanasia. I agree completely with the idea of Voluntary Euthanasia, which is the mercy killing of someone with their consent.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The clash of ideology describing whether or not life is a privilege or a right has become an increasingly prominent issue in the politics of society today. One of the major topics falling under this moral dilemma is assisted suicide. Assisted suicide, also known as euthanasia, is commonly known as the act of suicide brought upon someone willingly by a trusted physician. As this concept has been extremely controversial, two main arguments have formulated equally passionate claims which add to this endless debate. While one side believes that this use of euthanasia defies societal norms, the other claims that it is crucial to those who are suffering due to agonizing diseases or injuries which will eventually become fatal.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Euthanasia be banned? The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia In Australia

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although, it has negative benefits to the public interest, personally, I support for euthanasia. From the point of Utilitarian…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I am going to talk about the topic of euthanasia. I will argue that active euthanasia is morally permissible in the case of a terminally ill patient who is going through unbearable amounts of pain. Furthermore, the focus of this paper will only be on this type of euthanasia; active euthanasia. However, in the first part of my essay I will not only define what active euthanasia is but I will explain how it differs from other types of euthanasia such as physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is Assisted Suicide Ethical? Physician-assisted suicide, also known as euthanasia or mercy killing is the act intentionally inducing a painless and quick death to patients who suffer from serious forms of diseases or patients in a permanent coma (Sjöstrand). Normally, it is carried out by a doctor or a nurse. Euthanasia has raised a lot of controversies all over the world and the main argument is based on whether causing a painless death is ethical. The advocates of euthanasia claim that it is ethical to perform euthanasia on terminally ill patients since it is a solution to patients who are hopeless and in great pain.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay, I will contend that Brock’s argument in favor of the moral permissibility of voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) is sound and that Brock offers persuasive responses to the objection that (A) VAE is an act which involves the deliberate killing of an innocent person and (B) the deliberate killing of an innocent person is always morally wrong. To achieve this, I will begin by summarizing Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE. Then, I will synthesize the objection to Brock’s argument and Brock’s subsequent responses. Finally, I will describe why I find Brock’s responses persuasive. Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE can be constructed as follows: (1) VAE is supported by the “values of patient well-being…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Depending on the situations, voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia can be looked upon as voluntary manslaughter (someone kills another person, but situation can somewhat justify their actions) or murder. Euthanasia is divided into two different categories, passive euthanasia and active euthanasia. This paper is to briefly explore euthanasia and the different definitions, and to explore whether active euthanasia should be practiced in the United States or abroad. CRITICAL ISSUES The concern of human life and pleasure, and not their destruction, is the first and only legitimate object of good government.”…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One great thinker that has examined the morality of what has become known as voluntary euthanasia is Professor Peter Singer. Singer, in general, believes that voluntary euthanasia is morally permissible and goes to great lengths supporting his viewpoint. Despite his well-supported opinion, there are other thinkers that disagree with his moral reasoning. Each of those philosophers explains in detail the flaws…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia Debate

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Advances in medical technology has enabled human beings to live for a longer period of time, therefore they are faced with different diseases and ailments that were not very common a century ago such as cancer, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. When struck with any of this terminal illness patient are sometimes faced with end of life decisions. End of life decisions have legal and ethical concerns based on patient autonomy, beneficence, and the loss of decision making (Peirce & Smith, 2013). Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide has been gaining momentum in the United States and within the European union. For the purpose of this paper Euthanasia is defined as a deliberate intervention with the intention of hastening death, or relieve…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is a serious issue in today’s society. Euthanasia is the act of relieving someone of his or her suffering by intentionally ending his or her life. Many people argue that euthanasia is beneficial to the person suffering as well as his or her family. On the other hand, many people argue that euthanasia is morally wrong. Overall, euthanasia is not beneficial to anyone, and the practice should be stopped for good.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To ascertain whether euthanasia is morally permissible a great deal of reasoning is required, in “Euthanasia” Phillipa Foot lays out her logic for rationalizing the subject by providing several instances defending and disputing euthanasia. Foot takes the traditional definition of euthanasia, that exclusively specifies a particular manner of death, to encompass the grounds upon which an individual considers to come about making the choice to end their life. Foot holds the belief that euthanasia is morally justified when one's quality of life is so depleted that death would bring about the greatest amount of good for that one person involved. For something to be good, it must be beneficial for an individual in particular.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The following three arguments will subsequently be anaylzed in the philosophical context of moral theories put forth by Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill. The first argument in favour of permitting euthanasia is that when an individual is suffering from a terminal disease or unbearable pain, it it seen as morally just to allow them to terminate their life, rather than forcing them to continue suffering. Euthanasia in this scenario is perceived as a humanitarian solution through…

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nobody can know what the short term consequences of someone going through euthanasia will be. Once they are killed, their family could be devastated, so does that mean the person should live? That’s why long term consequences must be considered as well because the long term consequences could be that the person is now out of pain and the family have moved on. This is difficult because it’s hard to know whether long or short term consequences should be thought of when making a…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics