Thomas Hilgers Influence On Human Development

Improved Essays
Dr. Thomas Hilgers is founder of the Pope Paul VI Institute for the study of reproduction and firmly supports unborn human life. He has witnessed to this life through videos that walk viewers through the development of babies still in the womb. He is a believer in “human beings with potential,” not “potential human beings,” and there is a difference. “Potential human beings” states that the fetuses have potential to be human beings, assuming they are not yet human. In contrast, “human beings with potential” means that the babies are human even though they are not yet born into the world. They have the potential, not be become human, because they already are, but potential to increase the good in the world. As Dr. Hilgers said, these …show more content…
Hilgers backed up his view of “human beings with potential” with similarities of humans and scientific ideas. His major focus was using the technology of 2D and 3D ultrasound to trace the development of the babies through gestation. His mainly pointed out the similarities between the fetus and more mature humans, as if disputing the argument that a human is not inside the woman’s womb. At twenty-five days, the heartbeat can be seen and at seven weeks, the body parts are homologous to fully developed humans—arms, legs, hands, feet, and a head with eyes. At this age, Dr. Hilgers refers to the baby as fully alive and totally human. And then by 15 weeks, the baby has distinguishable facial features. He also includes similarities between all humans: Dr. Hilgers also states that life in the womb is a shared experience of all the humans that ever existed (except Adam and Eve, but he didn’t address that). We all have the common ground of beginning life in the womb.
He also ventures to use scientific logic to convince his viewers that the fetus inside the womb is an individual human. He states that the moment the egg is fertilized by the sperm, a life is formed. When the genetic material of one (the male) joins another (the female), a new individual, with its own individual DNA, is created. The genetic differences between the mother or father and child prove that the life is not just a continued growth of the mother, but a unique individual. This baby has its own genome,
…show more content…
Hilgers makes the claim that babies would not be aborted if people really knew they were human. First of all, this is not true because there are stories of mother who kill their child after failed abortions. But even if his only goal was to convince people that fetuses too are humans, I believe he fell a little short. I would have liked to see a few more logical defenses. This could have carried even greater weight coming from a doctor and scientist. For example, I really appreciated the point that the child is genetically unique and therefore, its own person. But, on the basis of pictures and emotion, I do believe this video has the potential to cause someone to second guess his or her view of abortion—not as much a personal sonogram of a woman during which a mother can hear the heartbeat of her own child, but nonetheless, if one does not believe that a fetus is a human being, this video may be able to convince him otherwise. After this point, the title “Putting a Face on the Unborn Human Person” means so much

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Some people are not able to have children for medical reasons so they have to look into In Vitro Fertilization for further help, but “designer babies” are going farther than that. “Designer babies” should be illegal in the future because it is taking In Vitro Fertilization too far, it is unethical, not always reliable, and parents can have children without choosing their specific characteristics. There is a difference between easy decision making and moral decision making, but it is the effort that everyone has to put in to make the correct…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The government has a huge say on whether designer babies will be allowed, but I think it’s more up to the public to decide. Why wouldn’t the public want to have the choice on what their baby looks like, if the baby can be used as a donor for a sick of ill child? For the people that cannot have children due to disease from birth. The government has to think of all these factors before putting it into play and allowing the designer babies to be real. The debate from the public is normally more for the NO side of things, saying that it’s unhuman or against nature or its going to become cloning.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Does Life Start

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Christian groups want to put an end to this research saying the embryos being used are human beings that are being exploited and then dumped as medical waste. Whereas some scientist says the research will help people who are stricken with awful diseases find cures ( Embryos and Enoulment 2005) We must also ask the question of why some pregnancies come to term and others do not. If anything is physically wrong with the baby the woman 's body will usually terminate the pregnancy itself. This is a tragic thing that we grieve. Even people who are not necessarily Christian believe in a higher power that created life. "…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liu wishes to help those that can not have a baby on their own. In a perfect world, that’s what the artificial wombs would be made for. But Warmflash has a different opinion, he explains, that it is possible that we would just move the gestation process outside the human body. And the pro-life believers would force the women to consider moving the baby outside the female’s body, instead of an abortion. Because of the change in the NICU survival limit, the baby could continue to live outside its mother (3).…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (From http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/cloning/cloningrisks/) If these health problems arise in human clones, it is easy to see the inhumanity of cloning. Some say that cloning is more beneficial than not. If you needed an organ or limb transplant but there was no donor, you would just chop one out of your clone! You could lose as many limbs as you want, as long as you continued to make clones. Some women might want to have babies, but wouldn’t be able to.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is Human Cloning Possible

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Instead of creating clones that have to experience the effects of the imperfections, scientists should focus more on improving the lives of people by using other ways that does not include ethics or does not cause harm to others. These scientists are making the clones suffer through unneeded complications. Head states in the article, “Should human cloning be banned?”, “Scientists generally agree that it would be irresponsible to clone a human being until cloning has been perfected, given that the cloned human would probably face serious, and ultimately terminal, health issues.” It is impetuous for scientists to continue cloning because the babies that were made are alive and have their own feelings. They should not be forced to live with health issues their entire life because of our imperfect experiments. Scientists only want to create clones in order to have better organ donors.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Yes, having a child through cloning, surrogacy or invitro is a different form of reproduction, but that does not mean that it is wrong. Plus, these non-traditional methods of reproduction allow couples or women to have the biological children they may not be able to have naturally (2) The belief that a cloned child would not have their own individuality. The fact that Kass, who I would guess to be educated believes this, shows in my opinion his ignorance and bias on the subject. I will be open minded enough to give him the benefit of having a lack of knowledge because his paper was written in 1997 and there have been a number of changes in the scientific community that he would not have been aware of. The thing is just because two people share the same genetic coding does not mean that the DNA coding both people manifest in the same way.…

    • 2288 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mothers and parents should cherish the time they have with the special gift sent from God, and some might ask: if a baby is going to be brain dead or not be able to walk or talk, death is better than them suffering each and every day and being made fun of, is it not? Absolutely not; any women who know ahead of time if something is going to be wrong with their baby, should not have the final say so over whether they can abort their baby or not, and no one should say that decision would be okay. Doctors and physicians should offer advice about clinics and therapies that could help once the baby arrived. Nothing is more selfish than a woman who will not give up for her own baby; those who believe in abortion obviously have no morals and concepts on how important a potential life can and will be. Babies are beautiful, and all deserve a chance at life.…

    • 1531 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Also, with the use of the transfer they were able to genetically modify the child’s DNA. Although, there is an effect to changing the DNA. They not only changed the genetic code of these children, but their children, and many generations to come. Even though the scientist at St. Barnabas Hospital were close to a breakthrough “the U.S. Food and Drug Administration stopped the practice because there was no pre-clinical data about its safety, and because several fetuses created with the technique showed genetic anomalies” (Cussins, 2014). Genetically modifying children can lead to overall problems.…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This method aims to help conditions such as the repairing of severed nerves, cancer, diabetes, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's and many other through either treatment, cures, or transplants. The main process by which this takes place is taking embryo stem cells from human embryos that are then capable of forming any part of the human body. Once you take the stem cells though, the embryo is destroyed. For this reason, amongst others, this technique is also debatable. Some believe that the use of human embryos as objects damages our outlook on life because the research that is carried out won't end benefit the embryo in any way, shape, or form.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays