Don Marquis Abortion Philosophy Essay

Superior Essays
Ty’onna Key
Philosophy Paper

Don Marquis claims that abortion is immoral and therefore impermissible in most cases. I will argue that abortion is not immoral and should be permissible in all cases. Marquis says abortion is immoral because you take away the fetus’ right to a future like ours. He believes this is the same as killing an adult human, which is considered immoral. He argues that killing an adult human is wrong and the adult has the same value as a fetus then abortion is also wrong. In his paper he wants readers to agree that an adult and fetus have the same value. I am not willing to agree to that point. An adult human has had more experiences and values more than a fetus the value assigned to the fetus come from other people.
…show more content…
In the first place, this theory explains why we regard killing as one of the worst of crimes. (190)”. He uses this point to argue that what makes killing wrong is the loss of the value of the victim 's future. Again, I mention that he does not take into account the mother’s future that this fetus will intrude on. Disregarding the mother’s perspective can be compared to getting an arm amputated and declaring the action is immoral from the arms point of view. Abortion differs in each case and no situation is the same, to equate a case to another is immoral and unfair to the parties involved. Marquis writes “Since we do believe that it is wrong to kill defenseless little babies, it is important that a theory of the wrongness of killing easily account for this” although he is using emotional blackmail, it does not stray me from pointing out that embryos are not babies and due to the account of miscarriages and health issues it is not determined they will have a future. Pregnancy is a dangerous time for the mother and fetus and most miscarriages happen between 7 and 12 weeks. Killing is the worst of crimes except in the cases of self-defense. Self-defense is the defense of one 's person or interests, especially through the use of physical force. Marquis finds abortion permissible when the mother’s life is directly in danger. I would argue that being forced to have a child when you are not ready/don’t want to, is a danger to life. Self-defense in that having the abortion would protect the mother and child. Raising a child is a lengthy, costly and emotional journey, parenthood is not for everybody. Many pro-lifers suggests adoption instead of abortion. Currently, there are close to 400,000 children in state custody; only half have permanent plans for placement. Meanwhile, employees in protective services are underpaid and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Dejectedly, abortion is the deliberate termination of a pregnancy. Is abortion morally right or wrong? Well that would depend on who you ask. For those that feel abortion is morally right would argue that a woman has a right to decide what happens to her body. Yet, those that feel abortion is morally wrong would argue that life starts at conception therefore killing a fetus is murder.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, a person taking away another person’s rights is illegal. And the right to choose what happens with your body should include having an abortion or not. Another argument pro-life people would have is that it is obviously risky for the mom. Having an abortion can result in complications in the mother’s future health, like he risk of ectopic pregnancies doubles, and the chance of a miscarriage and pelvic inflammatory disease also increases. (Lowen) I would argue that it’s risky either way.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Permissibility of Abortion: Noonan V. Thompson The topic of abortion has been of much dispute throughout time. Some seeing abortion as the mother’s right to choice, others as murder. Most pro-life supporters argue that fetuses have the right to life and to aborting it is murder. Judith Thompson concedes that fetuses may have the right to life but that only gives the fetus a right to not be unjustly killed. Thus, if abortion is justifiable, then abortion is morally permissible.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you consider the fetus is not alive when it’s in the woman’s womb, then it isn’t unethical to abort it. If you believe it is alive and you abort it, you essentially just murdered an innocent child. Abortion is a very controversial issue. It’s understandable why people have moral conflicts over the topic, and that is their right. Is abortion moral or immoral?…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The most common question asked in abortion debates is whether or not a fetus is a person. In “A Defense of Abortion” by Judith Thomson, she argues that abortion can be morally permissible even if you consider the fetus a person. In “Why Abortion is Immoral” by Don Marquis, the author argues that the fetus is not a person but robbing it of a future like ours is unethical. Like Thomson, I believe there are circumstances where abortion is permissible. I believe when the mother’s life is in danger, in the case of rape, and in the case of failed contraception abortion is permissible.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Groothius insists that because a fetus is a human person, the process of an abortion is equivalent to murder. Groothius states “all unnecessary and intentional life-taking is murder, a deeply evil and repugnant offense against human beings” (2). A fetus may have the capability of becoming a developed, conscious human, however having an abortion is not equivalent to murder. The unborn relies entirely on the mother for its existence and development, therefore the mother deserves the right to decide whether or not the fetus may reside within her. A women should not be called a murderer if she chooses to remove what she’s unwillingly grown within herself.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Question 2 Can Marquis’ account of the wrongness of abortion consistently allow for exceptions to a moral sanction against the act of terminating pregnancy? Why or why not? Marquis derives his argument against abortion on the perception of general wrongness of being involved in killing. Killing human beings is wrong because it deprives majority of them from their own future. It can be argued that the account of wrongness of abortion according to Marquis cannot allow for exceptions to carry out moral sanction which is opposed towards the various acts of termination of pregnancy.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also by aborting a fetus it is punishing an unborn child who committed no crime, which unethical since it was not justified. Another thing is since life begins as a fetus, abortion is like murder as it the act of depriving one of…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion Is Morally Wrong

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Therefore, since fetuses have a "future like ours," it is obvious that abortion is morally wrong because human fetuses do not desire to be killed. In addition, abortion is also wrong due to the Golden Rule being right. Abortion is wrong in behalf of the simplest moral principle: the Golden Rule, "[d]o unto others what you would have the do unto you, and do not do unto others what you would not have them do unto you." The Golden Rule suggests treating others the way you want to be treated, and never do anything to others you would not wish to be done to you. The reason why the Golden Rule is right and abortion is wrong is for the reason that no one wants to be killed, especially a human fetus that is actually seeking to escape although it takes time to do so.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is a crime to kill a person. Some people quote the significance form The federal Unborn Victims of Violence Act(2004) that “to protect unborn children from assault and murder”. They believe that abortion kills unborn children’s life, so abortion should be illegal. However, they do not realize that there is no conflict between legal abortion and protection for unborn baby. The words, “assault and murder”, in the sentence means those actions that intentionally harm pregnant women and lead them to abortion.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays