Argumentative Essay On Abortion

Superior Essays
Register to read the introduction… Either way, no argument is really formed. No reasons are given. For sake of challenging an actual argument, she is disregarding this issue. With this premise out of the way, she addresses the basic argument the pro-choice campaign believes. “Every person has a right to life. So the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body; everyone would grant that. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother’s right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed.” The remainder of her paper is a series of analogies meant to challenge the basic argument mention above. When looking at the analogies separately, they are in no way related to the abortion topic, but the conclusions drawn from each can be applied. Because these examples aren’t directly related to the debate, our emotions won’t necessarily be involved and we can clearly …show more content…
This analogy is challenging the more extreme view held by those in opposition to abortion. This view finds abortion “impermissible even to save the mother’s life.” Imagine a woman has become pregnant and in the same day learns of a newly developed heart disease that will kill her if she carries her baby to term. The baby has a right to life, but so does the woman. Thomson brings up the argument most familiar. “Performing the abortion would be directly killing the child, whereas doing nothing would not be killing the mother, but letting her die.” The conclusion that is drawn from this scenario is that your own right to life gives you the moral right to “unplug” yourself if your life is threatened. Equally, if there is a risk of the mother dying, she has a right to end the pregnancy in order to save herself. It cannot be considered murder to kill someone in order to save yourself. This analogy shows the extreme view to be false. To further weaken the extreme view, Thomson addresses the argument against third parties. She believes that, just a like a woman having the right to choose to save her life, a third party should be able to choose if he/she want to …show more content…
She wishes to sway the ideas of those who are against abortion by challenging the arguments they give for thinking so. She is challenging the common argument those who are against abortion use by presenting situations similar yet different. She states “what I have been asking is whether or not the argument we began with, which proceeds only from the fetus’s being a person, really does establish its conclusion, I have argued that is does not.” In conclusion, I feel she brings appropriate points on the table to defend her argument. It is true that the basic argument is not an accurate argument or one that can be used for every case. She isn’t claiming that abortions are always permissible or that it is permissible to secure the death of an unborn child. I do not believe in abortion for reasons I will not address at this time and therefore am not claiming to feel the same Thomson does about all of her arguments, but I do agree that the “right to life” argument is not a solid one. With the analogies Thomson set out, it is clear that cases must be looked at individually because the details make all the difference. I feel she succeeds in her goal. She challenges the way I feel about abortion and requires that I justify my reasons for or against it for more than just the fetus’s “right to

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The pro-life parties believe that abortion should be illegal, generally for these reasons; the moral right to life of a person begins at conception, induced abortions are an unjust killing which violate the fetus’s right to life, and that the law should not allow such unjust violations to life. The pro-choice parties argue that; women should have the right to control what happens inside and to their own body, abortion is simply an exercise of this right, and that the law should not be able to bring criminal charges to someone who has the right to control what happens to their body. Now I would like to take a deeper look into the philosophical view on the argument of why abortion is immoral and wrong. Anti-abortion supporters claim that it is a very simple concept of why abortion is immoral. For example, Don Marquis, an anti-abortion supporter states, “It is…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion Research Paper

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Abortion is legal in the United States of America and rightly so. In other countries abortion laws are restrictive that even when a mother’s life is in jeopardy a woman does not have the choice to abort. The feeling when a doctor tells you that you are going to die because of a complication with the fetus in your womb can be devastating. The doctor claims he cannot abort the fetus because of the laws to protect life. This research paper will evaluate the reasons why abortion should be legal in every country around the world by the help of scholarly journals and testimonials of real woman on the benefiting factor of abortion.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Abortion Issues

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In such cases pro-choice supporters may feel that abortion is the answer. It seems unreasonable to various women overall, when a woman could be made to have a baby that happened out of a rape or incest. Nevertheless, the main emphasis of pro-choice is not really any these issues, it is the right to…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    She did not willingly preform any act that could have resulted in pregnancy, and therefore did not have any choice in whether or not the fetus came into being. Possibly the most argued topic regarding abortion revolves around the point at which the fetus gains the right to life. My argument is that a woman’s right to choose what happens to her body is greater than any right the fetus may have, therefore making this topic irrelevant. Surely, there must be some instances to which this becomes a bit of a grey area, as with…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Argument On Abortion

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I also hear that if a woman wants to have intercourse and does not want to get pregnant, than she should be using some type of birth control. I will argue why these statements are not true whatsoever. Most people believe that all people should accept the consequences to their actions, and that is something I believe as well. This is probably why pro-lifers argue that abortion is wrong because the women chose to have sex and now she needs to be willing to accept that child that she is now pregnant with, or the “consequence” of her actions. Often enough, though, a woman ends up pregnant even when she has taken necessary steps to not get pregnant, such as using contraceptives.…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, a person taking away another person’s rights is illegal. And the right to choose what happens with your body should include having an abortion or not. Another argument pro-life people would have is that it is obviously risky for the mom. Having an abortion can result in complications in the mother’s future health, like he risk of ectopic pregnancies doubles, and the chance of a miscarriage and pelvic inflammatory disease also increases. (Lowen) I would argue that it’s risky either way.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    She believes that most people would kill the baby to save themselves in self-defense. Since self-defense is considered morally permissible, then abortion due to life endangerment is also morally permissible. In the case of third party intervention in an abortion, Thompson gives another scenario in which two people are fighting over a coat that would save their life. She first states that if the reader did not know then it is not their right to choose who gets the coat. Later, she states that if it belongs to one of the two people, then the reader has a right to help that person remain possession of the coat.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s societies around the world, there is currently two factions of the highly controversial topic of abortion and whether it should be allowed or outlawed. These two factions on opposite sides are pro-choice and pro-life. Pro-choice supporters in essence believes a woman has the right to an abortion if she decides to do so. On the other hand, pro-life supporters believe the fetus is its own human being and has the right to live, thus an abortion cannot be performed on the woman. Judith Jarvis Thomson, a philosophy professor supports the right to an abortion in her paper, “A defense of Abortion” (186).…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is allowing mothers to die with the fetus due to an unsafe abortion moral? Making the procedure illegal would be counter productive morally when considering these unsafe, underground abortions. Groothius must recognize why a women would choose to have an abortion, as no expecting,…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roe Vs. Wade

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Killing is murder and murder are ethical absolutes. Taking a life of a fetus is also taking away a person 's right to live. No one has the right to take away a life of a person, especially the innocent unborn child who cannot defend its authority, the right to life. Adding to this exception, the woman has the right to abortion. IF, a woman got pregnant without her consent, like in the case of rape or incest then she has the right to terminate her pregnancy.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays