A Defense Of Abortion And Hursthouses Virtue Theory And Abortions

Great Essays
Bailey Washington
Mr. Reynolds
Philosophy
MWF 8:30
1 December 2016
Thomson vs. Hursthouse In this paper I will be comparing and contrasting Thomsons A Defense of Abortion and Hursthouses Virtue Theory and Abortions. Also in my paper I will be sharing my opinion on abortion and which view I agree with. The two share similar concerns of abortion and that is if the status of the fetus is a human being or a clump of cells and also the right of the woman. Abortion is the deliberate termination of pregnancy most often performed during the first twenty eight weeks of pregnancy. There is a plethora of controversy about whether or not women should be allowed to get an abortion or not. Thomson states that killing an innocent person is always and
…show more content…
It is her body and she has the right to do whatever she wants with her body, however abusing abortion is not acceptable. Abortion is not a form of contraception therefore it should only be used for specific purposes like Hursthouse stated. There are exceptions for getting an abortion, but not everyone sees it that way. No one can say what anyone should do in the case of getting an abortion or not unless you are the one in that position. The exceptions include rape, health, and overall health of the fetus. In the piece written by Thomson she spoke about the mom having a cardiac condition. This is an example as to why a woman would want to get an abortion for her health and also ensuring that when she does choose to have a child she will be there for her baby and love he or she unconditionally. An example of over using abortions is just simple not using contraceptives and aborting the baby because you chose not to use protection. This is a reason that some may feel the need to get rid of abortions altogether but in the end there will always be exceptions to …show more content…
Thomson and Hursthouse both have come to the conclusion that abortion is impermissible but there are acceptable situations in which abortion should be permitted. In my opinion I agree with both Thomson and Hursthouse but in the end the conclusion of Hursthouse is the view I could see making both sides of abortion acceptable. When a woman and man conceive a baby knowingly, getting an abortion will only occur in the event of a health risk or the chances of the baby living after birth will be so minimum. By choosing abortion before letting the child get to full term is less painful than carrying the baby to full term and giving themselves false hope. It is understandable that some may want to fight for that chance but there is the option of abortion. Thomson also says that allowing someone to use your body is different from them having the right to. When the violinist was attached to her she never gave him the right to use her body but say may see it as a moral obligation to allow him to use her body. For anyone to see what that truly feels like they would need to be put in that situation but overall it would be an internal conflict between morally doing what is right and what you would want for yourself. It would either be you choosing the “right” thing to do or everyone being mad at you for choosing what is best for you and your baby, or in that case what is right for the violinist. In the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    I believe it is a right, as it is her body. Mainly, I would consider myself pro-choice. While I do understand that abortion might be totally against some people’s personal beliefs or religion, I do not believe that abortions should be restricted. While I am pro-choice, I am not a supporter of late terminations of pregnancy. I am glad that in Roe v. Wade states have the ability to regulate the abortion during the second and third trimester.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These cases are supposed to be analogous to cases of rape, threat to life, or when a woman has taken reasonable precautions not to get pregnant. Thomson does not, however she concludes that abortion is justified in any and every case. There is a moral requirement to be a Minimally Decent Samaritan as Thomson puts it, and this makes a late abortion wrong if it is done just for the sake of convenience. To use her example, it would be wrong for a woman in her seventh month of pregnancy to get an abortion just to avoid the nuisance of postponing a trip…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ethical Issues Surrounding Abortion The abortion debate is one that has baffled the world for centuries, and in the process has made this debate more complex and controversial. The abortion debate handles the ‘rights’ and ‘wrongs’ associated with the deliberate termination of pregnancy, which ultimately destroys the fetus.[1] Around the world, abortion has become a very sore topic, with many men and women finding themselves in a moral dilemma with regards to pregnancy termination.[2] This polarising topic has either supporters or opposers, with very few that remain undecided. There are two main questions that are often raised in this moral debate.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay “Why Abortion is Immoral,” philosopher Don Marquis uses utilitarian principles to argue that “abortion is, except in rare cases, seriously immoral… [and] in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (223). However, he deliberately avoids relating his thesis to abortion in the specific contexts of rape, maternal death, and severe postpartum health complications. Thus, in my analysis of his claim, I plan on adopting Marquis’ utilitarian perspective to evaluate the permissibility of abortion in regard to these delicate scenarios. I will begin my paper by giving a brief summary of “Why Abortion is Immoral.”…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judith Thompson on a Defense on Abortion Is abortion a morally permissible act? Some people’s radical point of view vary from the abortion being “murder of innocents” to “there’s nothing wrong with it” while other believe that depending on the stage of the pregnancy or the circumstances the woman got pregnant, abortion may be morally permissible. Judith Thomson in her essay “A Defense on Abortion” provides an essay that explains with particular examples when an abortion is morally permissible. Thomson believes that opponents of abortion had been so busy defending the rights of the fetus that they had forgotten to take on account the body that is harvesting the fetus. However, to make her argument more effective, Thomson decides to grant that the fetus is a human being in order to argue that in extraordinary cases like rape or life risk for the mother, abortion is morally…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomson presents the anti-abortionist argument in the beginning of her paper. In order to get a better understanding of the argument I have taken the time to put it in numbered premise conclusion form: Every person has a right to life. The fetus is a person.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that abortion is justifiable due to the fact that in the early stages of pregnancy the unborn child is only a clump of cells and tissues. I, however will argue that Thomson’s views are inadequate due to simple life cycles and the false pretenses that an unborn child isn’t a real “person”. Thomson who, although has some very useable points from her paper “A Defense of Abortion” I still would have to disagree and stand firm in my position of anti-abortion. But we won’t get into that; just yet.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judith Jarvis Thomson and Rosalind Hursthouse have differing opinions on abortion’s morality. In this paper, I will explain both of their arguments for the moral grounds of abortion and explain how Thomson’s analogy of the “world’s famous violinist” differs from abortion, which weakens it. Rosalind Hursthouse is a Professor of Philosophy at University of Auckland, and in her paper, “Virtue Theory and Abortion”, she uses virtue theory to respond to critics by using it how it may be show in the debate of abortion. (Hursthouse 849) Hursthouse begins her paper with explaining virtue theory, which dictates whether an action would be preformed by a virtuous person. One of the key principles of virtue theory are that action are right if and only if acted as a virtuous person would.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rosalind Hursthouse first sates in her essay “Virtue Theory and Abortion” the rules of the Virtue Theory and then applies it on how a virtue theorist would approach abortion. She explains the premises of virtue theory and how an action is only right if it is something a virtuous person would do. She then talks about how a person should only act if they truly understand what a virtuous person would do and not act on morals that are those considered by deontologists since those define something as morally right in accordance to moral laws but a virtuous person does not follow moral laws, they are that because their character leads them to doing the right thing and to promote the wellbeing of human life. Under the consideration of the virtue theory for abortion, the life of the fetus and the rights of the mother are both thrown out by virtue theory and are considered irreverent.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the sake of the argument, we consider the fetus to be a person and have the right to life. Opposed to Thomson, I believe that aborting the fetus should be considered unjust killing because it is being deprived of the right to use the mother's body. My first and obvious premise are that the mother is causally responsible for the existence of the fetus. By casually responsible I mean to say that the mother partially caused the fetus to exist, while performing sex.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, an abortion in the seventh month of the pregnancy without any complications, is more indecent then an abortion in the third month with complications. Thompson concludes by stating that although mothers have the right to abort their fetuses that does dot grant them the right to kill them if the fetus survives the abortion and that abortion is not strictly either morally permissible or morally impermissible but depends on the…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite the horrifying reality linked to abortion, the debate about allowing abortion in a moral society has never ceased. There are various ethical theories that would support abortion based on some arguments. The theory argues that the moral rightness is based on the total good the consequences of a certain activity (Sinnott-Armstrong, 1). According to the consequentialist ethical theory, a consequentialist would first enquire on the consequences allowing the abortion and not allowing abortion. The people who support this theory would want to know the action that would produce the greatest goodness for either the child or the mother.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Forty-two million abortions are performed worldwide each year. That's more than the entire population of Canada, which would cost unprepared families over five hundred billion dollars in just one year. To kill an unborn with horrible procedures is not only wrong for the doctors, but morally wrong too. As a society we lean towards economic explanations for behaviour, and in some ways this makes sense.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She suggests that because a pregnancy is such a great sacrifice, that, while women should carry a child to term after becoming pregnant, we cannot require them to do so. This argument also requires that the fetus’ right to life is subject to the mother’s whim and does not carry as much weight as the first two arguments. Thomson concludes the article by saying that she is not attempting to delineate the circumstances in which a pregnancy might be morally permissible and those in which it isn’t, but rather to make it clear that even if we consider a fetus to be a person, that abortion can still be morally permissible. This weakens her argument a great deal, instead of providing a proscriptive criterion to base the morality of abortion on, she simply provides what may be a series of fringe cases to establish that while abortion is normally wrong, it isn’t always so. Thomson’s argument on abortion is fundamentally deontological.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Utilitarian and Deontological Discussion of Abortion Today, abortion has become a heavily debated topic whether socially or politically since the medical procedure was voted legal by the Supreme Court over 40 years ago. It is defined as the purposeful termination of a pregnancy before a normal childbirth (Abortion: Get Facts About the Procedure and Statistics). Whether you find yourself agreeing with it or not, many people have something to say. Abortion is very controversial because of the discussion whether or not a fetus is a person. Many wonder if there is a morally relevant point at some duration throughout the pregnancy or development of the fetus that could justify having an abortion or possibly not having an abortion.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays