Marquis Abortion Case Study

Great Essays
Question 2

Can Marquis’ account of the wrongness of abortion consistently allow for exceptions to a moral sanction against the act of terminating pregnancy? Why or why not?
Marquis derives his argument against abortion on the perception of general wrongness of being involved in killing. Killing human beings is wrong because it deprives majority of them from their own future. It can be argued that the account of wrongness of abortion according to Marquis cannot allow for exceptions to carry out moral sanction which is opposed towards the various acts of termination of pregnancy. This is because his argument concerning the wrongness of killing applies to the people who have a future. His argument shows that the people who have a future with
…show more content…
However, according to Marquis, killing an embryo is different from killing adult humans because the adults usually have a life which they usually value and they prefer not to lose it at any specific period in time. However, a fetus can develop to have such a life and therefore killing them can have an impact too.
Question 3
According to Steinbock, an early term fetus is not sentient. Explain why Steinbock makes this claim, and then how she uses this claim to argue that most abortions are not seriously morally wrong. Make sure to discuss how the interests view relates to this argument.

Steinbock argues that a fetus is not sentient and her definition of sentient is the ability to feel pain as well as pleasure. According to her, the fetus does not have any moral status because it is unborn and it does not have any feelings (Steinbock, 1999). Therefore, it is morally justified that abortion can take place. According to her most of the non-sentient beings cannot be hurt because it does no matter to them concerning what will happen. When carrying out abortions, the unborn children are not accorded any interests because they do not have any interests. This shows that carrying out abortions can be justified because the fetus has no feelings, it has no interests and therefore abortions can be carried on
…show more content…
Does his argument work? Why or why not?
Most of the prohibitionist usually argue that drug abuse has to be banned because it is harmful to the health of the various individuals and the prohibition of drugs usually decreases the rate of drug abuse in the general society. According to them, the government should be given the mandate of preventing people from harming themselves through prohibition of drugs in the society. Huemer argues that the prohibition of drug should not be done because the government does not be involved in preventing people from harming themselves (Huemer, 2004).

According to him, most of the drugs which are prohibited has a lower rate of contribution to the rate of death than the legalized ones. For instance, tobacco causes deaths of more than 15 users out of 1000 users as compared to the prohibition of other drugs which causes deaths of up to 2.6 users out of 1000. This shows that the rate of deaths for the people who are using drugs which are prohibited is lower and there is no point of limiting the use of such

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Disregarding the mother’s perspective can be compared to getting an arm amputated and declaring the action is immoral from the arms point of view. Abortion differs in each case and no situation is the same, to equate a case to another is immoral and unfair to the parties involved. Marquis writes “Since we do believe that it is wrong to kill defenseless little babies, it is important that a theory of the wrongness of killing easily account for this” although he is using emotional blackmail, it does not stray me from pointing out that embryos are not babies and due to the account of miscarriages and health issues it is not determined they will have a future. Pregnancy is a dangerous time for the mother and fetus and most miscarriages happen between 7 and 12 weeks. Killing is the worst of crimes except in the cases of self-defense.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They don’t want the government to have the right to tell us what to do with our rights, whether it be with abortions, contraception use, etc. However, being pro-choice generally has a negative reputation. It’s assumed that they want women to terminate pregnancies, they want people to be able to “legally murder”. When in fact, pro-life people are against any type of murder just like pro-choice people, they just believe that women should be able to do what’s best for their life when it comes to their own body. Being pro-choice does not mean you support murder.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Performing the abortion would be directly killing the child, whereas doing nothing would not be killing the mother, but letting her die.” The conclusion that is drawn from this scenario is that your own right to life gives you the moral right to “unplug” yourself if your life is threatened. Equally, if there is a risk of the mother dying, she has a right to end the pregnancy in order to save herself. It cannot be considered murder to kill someone in order to save yourself. This analogy shows the extreme view to be false. To further weaken the extreme view, Thomson addresses the argument against third parties.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They claim it is murder. But it is all about basic faiths. (History) Abortion, in my opinion, is not a good thing. But it is a right that someone has and they should be allowed to express that right because, it’s someone’s right, we don’t know the circumstances of that person, and they may not want to deal with the long term…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is a crime to kill a person. Some people quote the significance form The federal Unborn Victims of Violence Act(2004) that “to protect unborn children from assault and murder”. They believe that abortion kills unborn children’s life, so abortion should be illegal. However, they do not realize that there is no conflict between legal abortion and protection for unborn baby. The words, “assault and murder”, in the sentence means those actions that intentionally harm pregnant women and lead them to abortion.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Warren’s article “Abortion Is Morally Permissible” discusses if a fetus deserves to have a right to live. She begins her argument with describing why fetuses do not deserve rights because they do not have any traits of personhood. She then points out that even throughout the entire pregnancy a fetus does not deserve rights, she ends her argument by stating that even though a fetus has the potential to become a person it should not have as much rights as a pregnant women who is already a person. Warren’s argument is thought out and has very little mistakes, but the few mistakes that are there can be pulled apart and can be used to destroy her argument. In the article “Abortion Is Morally Permissible” Warren argues that a women should be allowed…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is wrong, but no one should be judged for the actions and/or decisions they make. Every human being that breathes, walks, and thinks, can decide what to do with their body. In this paper I agree with Don Marquis’s view of abortion. Abortion is wrong because it deprives the fetus from its future. In other words, abortion is wrong because killing a future child stops it from growing and making a difference to their lives.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In cases like this it is hard to harm the fetus. As Thomson believes, the baby doesn’t necessarily have a right to the mother’s body because the mother was wrongfully harmed and has no intentions of having a child. In a situation like this, Thomson believes that it would be okay to have an abortion as long as the fetus isn’t…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why is fetus not a baby? Don Marquis sets out to prove once and for all that abortion is seriously wrong. However, in certain cases such as the form of a pregnancy that could endanger the mother’s life when the fetus is anencephalic, it can be permitted. In his argument, Marquis claims that abortion is wrong because it is wrong to kill a hermit and the loss of one’s life deprives one of all the experiences that would have established one’s future. I shall argue that although these claims seem to be successful, they still have errors.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He terms this “consenting adult killing” (Callahan pg. 625). Callahan argues that this issue contradicts the government is trying to control guns and arms, abolish capital punishment, and to control warfare. The second point is in the meaning of “consenting adult killing” and decreases self-determination. Callahan feels that the law misleads the patient to feel they have autonomy thinking that the active euthanasia will help them reach the good life.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays