One, that it isn’t a guarantee that a fetus will have a FLO only that it potentially could. However, Marquis disagrees that the potentially of the argument debunks it completely. Secondly, other believe that fetuses do not have interests or are conscious beings therefore abortion can be acceptable. This however doesn’t hold true about other temporarily unconscious beings who can’t be taken off life support simply because they aren’t temporarily conscious. Another problem individuals have with the FLO argument is that they believe it gives more value to younger lives than older ones. Although, this can’t be valid because murder punishments are not given out based on the age of the person killed. Lastly, the FLO argument doesn’t necessarily agree with contraception supporters. Having said that using contraception does not harm one individual or individual’s FLO. Marquis argues based on four main arguments why the FLO supports the claim that apportion is seriously wrong except in specific cases even with four
One, that it isn’t a guarantee that a fetus will have a FLO only that it potentially could. However, Marquis disagrees that the potentially of the argument debunks it completely. Secondly, other believe that fetuses do not have interests or are conscious beings therefore abortion can be acceptable. This however doesn’t hold true about other temporarily unconscious beings who can’t be taken off life support simply because they aren’t temporarily conscious. Another problem individuals have with the FLO argument is that they believe it gives more value to younger lives than older ones. Although, this can’t be valid because murder punishments are not given out based on the age of the person killed. Lastly, the FLO argument doesn’t necessarily agree with contraception supporters. Having said that using contraception does not harm one individual or individual’s FLO. Marquis argues based on four main arguments why the FLO supports the claim that apportion is seriously wrong except in specific cases even with four