Response To Marquis On Abortion

Superior Essays
Marquis argues that killing a fetus deprives it of a valuable future/future like ours, and concludes by saying abortion is not morally permissible. I agree with Marquis’ argument that it is wrong to kill a fetus through abortion because I believe that they have a valuable future as all humans do. While I agree with Marquis that majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral, I do believe that in some cases it is permissible. For instance, choosing to have an abortion after being sexually assaulted or due to life threatening circumstances would be acceptable reasons for having an abortion. Being that the loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses that can occur, I strongly concur with Marquis’s argument. I will first explain Marquis view and thoughts on …show more content…
The use of contraception is not immoral because there isn’t an individual to be deprived of a valuable future that early on. A sperm and an egg are two organisms, and before fertilization there is no specific individual organism meaning that it could not be “deprived of its future”. Neither the individual sperm, nor the individual egg, has a future of value. Only after fertilization occurs, does a fetus exist that possesses a valuable future. (Marquis 469) Marquis acknowledges that contraception prevents a possible future of value. However, he does not agree that contraception is morally wrong. He backs up his arguments by stating that, “There are hundreds of millions of sperm, one (released) ovum and millions of possible combinations of all of these. There is no actual combination at all…...This alternative does not yield an actual subject of harm either. The immorality of contraception is not entailed by the loss of a future like-ours argument simply because there is no non-arbitrary identifiable subject of the loss in the case of contraception….” (Marquis

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Marquis essay he argues that abortion is not right because killing the fetus is like killing an adult. Throughout the essay he questions that if it is right to kill a fetus it is right to kill living human. He then gives us the example of why it is wrong to kill a human. Marquis says that if you kill a human who has been alive that you are taking away their future and something valuable from them. You are ruining future possibilities of that person and he then ties that with the reason of why it is wrong to kill a fetus.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Phil 3 Dakota Wensley Phil 3 The purpose of this paper is to analyze Judith Jarvis Thompson’s argument for the permissibility of abortion in the cases of consensual sex when contraception was used. This paper will be divided into four parts. I am going to present Thompson’s argument and analogy and present the premises and conclusion, I will then put forth the best argument against Thompson’s argument and compare the two on the basis of logic and truth, next I will attempt to speak for Thompson and try to rebuttal on her behalf, and finally I will decide which argument is better and provide reasons for my decisions.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay “Why Abortion is Immoral,” philosopher Don Marquis uses utilitarian principles to argue that “abortion is, except in rare cases, seriously immoral… [and] in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (223). However, he deliberately avoids relating his thesis to abortion in the specific contexts of rape, maternal death, and severe postpartum health complications. Thus, in my analysis of his claim, I plan on adopting Marquis’ utilitarian perspective to evaluate the permissibility of abortion in regard to these delicate scenarios. I will begin my paper by giving a brief summary of “Why Abortion is Immoral.”…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the early nineteenth century, the percentage of infanticides and undesired childbearing was and still currently is abundantly high. Margaret Sanger, a sex educator, nurse, and American birth control activist, whom acknowledged the need to inform women on the self-control of childbirth gave a speech in 1921, “A Moral Necessity for Birth Control.” Sanger disputes that the understanding of “contraceptive techniques” would not only benefit families as a whole, but would also give women the right to control her body (Sanger). Meanwhile conveying this speech, Margaret controls the way the rhetorical devices influence the audience to support contraceptives as well as accomplishing in receiving credibility and disproving her opposition.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ty’onna Key Philosophy Paper Don Marquis claims that abortion is immoral and therefore impermissible in most cases. I will argue that abortion is not immoral and should be permissible in all cases. Marquis says abortion is immoral because you take away the fetus’ right to a future like ours. He believes this is the same as killing an adult human, which is considered immoral. He argues that killing an adult human is wrong and the adult has the same value as a fetus then abortion is also wrong.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophical critique on the traditional argument against abortion Robert Bertram - UBC ID: 24675373 Phil 333 (001) - Biomedical Ethics The University of British Columbia The concept of morality in relation to abortion is a significant cause of conflict. These moral ambiguities are put into question by Pope John Paul II’s excerpts on the “unspeakable crime of abortion” with regards to the validity, committed fallacies, and the fetus’s content to the right to life (Paul II, 1995, pg. 1). Paul II's Evangelium Vitae (1995), states that aborting a fetus is the "deliberate and direct killing...of a human being in the initial phase of his or her existence". In the paragraphs to follow, this essay will reconstruct the argument, and analyze Thomson's, and Warren's objection to Paul II's statement.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Abortion is Immoral? Marquis begins his discussion that standard arguments for and against abortion are unsophisticated and rather similar. He argues that there is a better way to define wrongful killing that would aid us in discussing the ethical stance of abortion. One of his prominent argument is that what makes killing wrong is its effect on the victim.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contraception on Both Sides of the Debate Birth control has been a controversial topic in the U.S. since the early 1900s. This topic has caused a divide in many religious groups on whether it is moral or immoral. I feel very strongly about this subject and have decided to learn about it in greater depth from both sides of the issue. There are many negatives to birth control and many positives as well.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This analogy is challenging the more extreme view held by those in opposition to abortion. This view finds abortion “impermissible even to save the mother’s life.” Imagine a woman has become pregnant and in the same day learns of a newly developed heart disease that will kill her if she carries her baby to term. The baby has a right to life, but so does the woman. Thomson brings up the argument most familiar.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “A more obvious answer is better. What primary makes killing wrong is neither its effect on the murderer nor its effect on the victim’s friends and relatives, but its effect on the victim… The loss of one’s life deprives one of all the experiences, activities, projects and enjoyments that would otherwise have constituted one’s future”(Marquis, 469). What Marquis is saying supports my argument because looking at abortion from a virtue ethics perspective, that child will not longer have a future. Once the abortion is done there is nothing to look forward to, no child, no one to look after or wait for.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In his essay, “Why Abortion Is Immoral”, he argues that abortion is taking away any future a fetus will have no matter good or bad. In this essay, he also explains how abortion has a greater effect on the fetus because it is the one who is dying. All aspects of that fetus’ future have been taken from him or her. In the quote below, Marquis further explains how the killing of the fetus affects the fetus more so than those who are around the…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (CLICK)The modern attitude of the Catholic Church to contraception was laid down in the 1930s when Pope Pius XI issued Casti Connubbi. This church document said that artificial contraception was a violation of the “law of God and nature” and that those who use it are “branded with the guilt of a grave sin.” (XI, 1930). The idea that the purpose of sexual intercourse is a ‘procreative’ function and should be cherish is what Catholics believe is a “natural law”. (CLICK)…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    philosophers Mary Anne Warren and Don Marquis have different views on the morality of abortion. Warren believes abortion is not immoral and Marquis argues that it is. Pro-choice activists believe that the…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I argue that abortion is prima facie morally wrong. Prima facie morally wrong means that the action at first is wrong, however sometimes there are ways to override its wrongness. My primary goal is to demonstrate that abortion, or killing a fetus, is prima facie morally wrong for the same reason that killing an innocent adult human being is morally wrong. I will also explore an objection to my claim and discuss my rational for why it fails to refute my argument. I believe it is prima facie morally wrong to kill an adult human being primarily because it denies them of a “future like ours” (Marquis, 1989).…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most intricate writers on the subject of abortion all believe that whether or not abortion is morally permissible stands or falls on whether or not a fetus is the sort of being whose life it is seriously wrong to end. The purpose of this paper isn’t to address the greater ethics of abortion such as abortion before implantation or abortion when the life of a woman is threatened by a pregnancy; rather I seek to address the general argument for the claim that the overwhelming majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral. I which to investigate further Don Marquis claim that I something is living its wrong to kill it. If this were true people that are dying from disease would believe that they loss a future and all the experiences that they would have had. The second one is that killing alone is wrong because it automatically takes away the greatest loss, which is their life.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays