Marquis begins his discussion that standard arguments for and against abortion are unsophisticated and rather similar. He argues that there is a better way to define wrongful killing that would aid us in discussing the ethical stance of abortion. One of his prominent argument is that what makes killing wrong is its effect on the victim.
There is a controversy over what makes killing wrong. Some say that it is wrong because of its effects on the murderer, some say it is because of its effects on the society and some say that it is unethical and wrong because of its effects on the victim of the murder. According to Marquis, killing is not bad because of its effect on the murderer or on the society, but, it is bad because of its effect on the victim. He argues that being killed inflicts one of the greatest losses to a person as it deprives the individual from all things in life that are valuable. Therefore, when a person is killed, he is deprived from his future enjoyments, projects or activities. Although this argument says why killing a child is wrong, it leaves us with a question that if it is just as wrong to kill fetuses by doing abortions. …show more content…
Thus, while he can argue why killing is bad, he really cannot be able to argue that the termination of life of a fetus just as bad. To address this concern, Don Marquis introduces some amendments to his original