Analysis: Why Abortion Is Immoral

Improved Essays
Why Abortion is Immoral?
Marquis begins his discussion that standard arguments for and against abortion are unsophisticated and rather similar. He argues that there is a better way to define wrongful killing that would aid us in discussing the ethical stance of abortion. One of his prominent argument is that what makes killing wrong is its effect on the victim.

There is a controversy over what makes killing wrong. Some say that it is wrong because of its effects on the murderer, some say it is because of its effects on the society and some say that it is unethical and wrong because of its effects on the victim of the murder. According to Marquis, killing is not bad because of its effect on the murderer or on the society, but, it is bad because of its effect on the victim. He argues that being killed inflicts one of the greatest losses to a person as it deprives the individual from all things in life that are valuable. Therefore, when a person is killed, he is deprived from his future enjoyments, projects or activities. Although this argument says why killing a child is wrong, it leaves us with a question that if it is just as wrong to kill fetuses by doing abortions.
…show more content…
Thus, while he can argue why killing is bad, he really cannot be able to argue that the termination of life of a fetus just as bad. To address this concern, Don Marquis introduces some amendments to his original

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis argues in his article An Argument that Abortion is Wrong that abortion, except in specific rare instances is seriously wrong. He bases this claim off of the principle that killing any innocent human being is wrong. While the central point of most pro-choice individuals is that women should have the right to control their body, Marquis argues that the right of the unborn fetus outweighs the right for a woman to control her body. Before supporting his thesis Marquis lays out one of the main problems in the abortion debate. People in favor of abortion often have a very narrow view on what constitutes a person and this is problematic because it leaves out infants, severely retarded and mentally ill individuals.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although abortion is not the same as a premature death, it still deprives the foetus of a future, similar to how death does. With this, Marquis attempts to sidestep a controversial premise of other arguments against abortions that suggest a foetus is a person with rights. By focusing on the future potential of the foetus. Marquis is able to sidestep a common controversial premise of other familiararguments against abortion that deal with the foetus’s status as a potential person and the rights potential people have. 4.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Marquis essay he argues that abortion is not right because killing the fetus is like killing an adult. Throughout the essay he questions that if it is right to kill a fetus it is right to kill living human. He then gives us the example of why it is wrong to kill a human. Marquis says that if you kill a human who has been alive that you are taking away their future and something valuable from them. You are ruining future possibilities of that person and he then ties that with the reason of why it is wrong to kill a fetus.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marquis argues in favor of this assumption because he believes that it is wrong to kill a fetus because it has a future of value like ours and depriving it of that future makes the vast of abortions immoral. On the other hand, Thomson’s argument rejects this assumption because she insists that under some circumstances abortion is permissible and moral. As mentioned above, she argues that the right to life of a fetus does not outweigh the right to use one’s body. So after analyzing Thomson’s argument, the answer to this question is that the vast majority of abortions are not immoral because in both the extreme and typical case, the woman has the choice of assuming responsibility for the fetus. So the morality of abortion according to Thomson depends on whether the killing is unjust and not the moral status of the fetus.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Then, I will recapitulate the basic foundations of utilitarianism and finally, delve into my assessment. 1. Summary Marquis precedes his argument concerning the philosophical immorality of abortion by summarizing the arguments of both those who favor strict restrictions on abortion and…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis Abortion

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The preservation of life, reproduction and the nurture of the young are precepts from natural law that agree with Marquis’ conclusion about abortion. There are also theories that disagree with Marquis’ position on…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this analysis I will show you where I agree and disagree in this topic about abortion whether it’s right or wrong. In the two articles about abortion one written by Jeffrey Reiman and the other article written by Don Marquis who are two well-known philosophers. The main two sides in these article about abortion is…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Disregarding the mother’s perspective can be compared to getting an arm amputated and declaring the action is immoral from the arms point of view. Abortion differs in each case and no situation is the same, to equate a case to another is immoral and unfair to the parties involved. Marquis writes “Since we do believe that it is wrong to kill defenseless little babies, it is important that a theory of the wrongness of killing easily account for this” although he is using emotional blackmail, it does not stray me from pointing out that embryos are not babies and due to the account of miscarriages and health issues it is not determined they will have a future. Pregnancy is a dangerous time for the mother and fetus and most miscarriages happen between 7 and 12 weeks. Killing is the worst of crimes except in the cases of self-defense.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marquis argues that killing a fetus deprives it of a valuable future/future like ours, and concludes by saying abortion is not morally permissible. I agree with Marquis’ argument that it is wrong to kill a fetus through abortion because I believe that they have a valuable future as all humans do. While I agree with Marquis that majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral, I do believe that in some cases it is permissible. For instance, choosing to have an abortion after being sexually assaulted or due to life threatening circumstances would be acceptable reasons for having an abortion. Being that the loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses that can occur, I strongly concur with Marquis’s argument.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This argument is wrong and does not stand strongly to oppose abortion. This theory only provides a highway for decision making based on the argument of greatest good. The consequentialists argue that may argue that an embryo does not have the capacity to feel pain or think therefore; carrying out an abortion is more like any other decision that avoids pregnancy. The theory also provides a decision making procedure for determining what is right or wrong about abortion.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is wrong, but no one should be judged for the actions and/or decisions they make. Every human being that breathes, walks, and thinks, can decide what to do with their body. In this paper I agree with Don Marquis’s view of abortion. Abortion is wrong because it deprives the fetus from its future. In other words, abortion is wrong because killing a future child stops it from growing and making a difference to their lives.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Westwig David Denby Intro to Ethics 15 December 2017 The Fundamental Problem of a Right to Life Abortion remains one of the flagship intractable problems in modern ethical theory. Numerous philosophers have attempted to apply existing theories to the moral question of abortion, and have used their results to invent and refine new theories. Mary Warren and Don Marquis, ethical philosophers and writers, embody the views of the two conflicting approaches. Warren takes a highly permissive stance on abortion, arguing that abortion should be permitted at any point during pregnancy, while Marquis claims that abortion, in general, is wrong, barring exceptional circumstances.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In his essay, “Why Abortion Is Immoral”, he argues that abortion is taking away any future a fetus will have no matter good or bad. In this essay, he also explains how abortion has a greater effect on the fetus because it is the one who is dying. All aspects of that fetus’ future have been taken from him or her. In the quote below, Marquis further explains how the killing of the fetus affects the fetus more so than those who are around the…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As human beings, there are certain things we value in life. When a human being dies, they no longer have the ability to have all of the pleasurable experiences that they would take part in in the future. “When one is killed, they are deprived both of what they now value which would have been part of my future personal life. Therefore, the loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses one can suffer” (Marquis, 1989). Through this reasoning, I came to the conclusion that killing an innocent adult human being…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis is correct in that the harm in killing is that your depriving the person of all their future valuable experiences and they would have had these experiences ahead of them. Their future experiences are valuable because there instrumental goods, the things that lead us to other goods. There are also intrinsic goods and both good are lost if their killed. Also by aborting a fetus it is punishing an unborn child who committed no crime, which unethical since it was not justified. Another thing is since life begins as a fetus, abortion is like murder as it the act of depriving one of…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays