Rhetorical Analysis Of Marquis By Marquis

Improved Essays
In Marquis essay he argues that abortion is not right because killing the fetus is like killing an adult. Throughout the essay he questions that if it is right to kill a fetus it is right to kill living human. He then gives us the example of why it is wrong to kill a human. Marquis says that if you kill a human who has been alive that you are taking away their future and something valuable from them. You are ruining future possibilities of that person and he then ties that with the reason of why it is wrong to kill a fetus. You are ripping future possibilities from them. It is not right for us to live and rip that from them. They will not get to live a life they fully deserve. Marquis says that killing is one of the worst crimes within abortion and killing someone already living their life because it is killing their potential value of living further. He points out that the fetus is growing and humans are growing and growing every single day. Because Marquis gives these examples he is telling us our reason and influencing us based on opinions. It is wrong because they have a right to life. …show more content…
He proceeds to say that it is okay to kill the cells. We can make out his points in given the premises that Marquis presents in his essay. Killing is wrong because they have a future. If killing a fetus is wrong because killing a living human is wrong because it strips them of possible achievements then if the fetus grows and we kill them we will be getting rid of their future achievements. Final conclusion is that if the fetus has a future like ours of precious value and killing the fetus it is morally wrong. Marquis gives a great example in the premises and trying to persuade us because he really emphasizes his main

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Tales of a Tyrant Rhetorical Analysis Essay Fear is a factor that only some individuals know the true feeling of, for its claws have personally grasped their soul and has been dragging them into its dark abyss of chaos. This emotion can create a shield for a powerful ruler to hide behind which provides them with the ability to control everyone, leading to the creation of a tyrannical power. In Tales of the Tyrant, Mark Bowden, the author and narrator, uses sarcastic diction to justify Saddam’s weaknesses of his survival along with detailing Saddam’s precautionary actions against his domination in order to prove how Saddam fears the world he is surrounded by and how he must hide from fear by putting it upon others. Sarcasm can play as an…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The values of all human beings are different. There are different variations or sides of the same values or completely contradicting views. Lord Chesterfield, an eighteenth century author wrote a letter to his son who was traveling far from him. Lord Chesterfield carefully uses the rhetorical strategies of ethos, pathos, and logos to describe his values of loyalty, directness and conformity. Lord Chesterfield expresses his value of loyalty quite obviously in this letter.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomson’s and Marquis’ Views on Abortion The subject of abortion is a highly controversial topic, with each side firmly believing that the opposing view is prima facie immoral. Much discussion regarding abortion is focused on whether or not a fetus can be categorized as a person. Many assume that if a fetus is labeled as a person, then it would be wrong to kill it; however, if a fetus has not reached personhood, then it should be fine to end its life. Judith Thomson decides to circumvent this discussion, realizing that it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to determine at which point a fetus becomes a person with a right to life.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay “Why Abortion is Immoral,” philosopher Don Marquis uses utilitarian principles to argue that “abortion is, except in rare cases, seriously immoral… [and] in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (223). However, he deliberately avoids relating his thesis to abortion in the specific contexts of rape, maternal death, and severe postpartum health complications. Thus, in my analysis of his claim, I plan on adopting Marquis’ utilitarian perspective to evaluate the permissibility of abortion in regard to these delicate scenarios. I will begin my paper by giving a brief summary of “Why Abortion is Immoral.”…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion: Roe V. Wade

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    It is completely immoral and wrong to kill a human being that has no voice in the decision. Abortion is legal murder. Murder is defined as the unlawful killing of one human being by another, especially with malice and forethought. The definition…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Disregarding the mother’s perspective can be compared to getting an arm amputated and declaring the action is immoral from the arms point of view. Abortion differs in each case and no situation is the same, to equate a case to another is immoral and unfair to the parties involved. Marquis writes “Since we do believe that it is wrong to kill defenseless little babies, it is important that a theory of the wrongness of killing easily account for this” although he is using emotional blackmail, it does not stray me from pointing out that embryos are not babies and due to the account of miscarriages and health issues it is not determined they will have a future. Pregnancy is a dangerous time for the mother and fetus and most miscarriages happen between 7 and 12 weeks. Killing is the worst of crimes except in the cases of self-defense.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Sandel Case Study

    • 1300 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1 Don Marquis: the argument in this case can be determined to standard consequentialism. It is consequentialists because Marquis argues that what makes abortion wrong is stripping the victim of its future, because it has a future like ours (Marquis 85-87). It is standard because he clarifies that these morally permissible cases will be “rare” (Marquis 90), thus establishing that in general he does not allow moral options. Michael Sandel: In the case of Sandel, the most appropriate framework within which we can interpret his work is virtue ethics. Sandel proposes that genetic enhancement is wrong because it represents the triumph of willfulness over giftedness (Sandel 127) and the loss of the virtue traits of humility, responsibility and solidarity…

    • 1300 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marquis’s FLO account of the wrongness of killing is based off of Marquis main claim fetuses have the…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Similar to what Marquis says in his writing, killing someone takes away the persons ability to function. Also looking at the mother’s perspective, she will not be experiencing the motherhood that can make her into the women she needs to be. Not saying that all women need to experience pregnancy, but those who can should at least once. Without going through all the body pains cause by the baby’s weight, cravings of food and etc. , she is not flourishing properly.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In his essay, “Why Abortion Is Immoral”, he argues that abortion is taking away any future a fetus will have no matter good or bad. In this essay, he also explains how abortion has a greater effect on the fetus because it is the one who is dying. All aspects of that fetus’ future have been taken from him or her. In the quote below, Marquis further explains how the killing of the fetus affects the fetus more so than those who are around the…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethics Of Infanticide

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Hence, killing infants is in and of itself not as morally wrong as killing actual persons. Thus it will be wrong to assume that just because “a being is a human being in the sense of a member of the Species Homo Sapiens” it is wrong to kill it. In her essay “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion.”…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I argue that abortion is prima facie morally wrong. Prima facie morally wrong means that the action at first is wrong, however sometimes there are ways to override its wrongness. My primary goal is to demonstrate that abortion, or killing a fetus, is prima facie morally wrong for the same reason that killing an innocent adult human being is morally wrong. I will also explore an objection to my claim and discuss my rational for why it fails to refute my argument. I believe it is prima facie morally wrong to kill an adult human being primarily because it denies them of a “future like ours” (Marquis, 1989).…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most intricate writers on the subject of abortion all believe that whether or not abortion is morally permissible stands or falls on whether or not a fetus is the sort of being whose life it is seriously wrong to end. The purpose of this paper isn’t to address the greater ethics of abortion such as abortion before implantation or abortion when the life of a woman is threatened by a pregnancy; rather I seek to address the general argument for the claim that the overwhelming majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral. I which to investigate further Don Marquis claim that I something is living its wrong to kill it. If this were true people that are dying from disease would believe that they loss a future and all the experiences that they would have had. The second one is that killing alone is wrong because it automatically takes away the greatest loss, which is their life.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Abortion

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This is highly irresponsible and careless. Abortion is murder. There is no clearer way to say it. It is stopping a beating heart and measurable brain waves (Willke). Everyone has the simple right to life.…

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A human life begins start at the time of the conception. A children does not deserve to be kill for the irresponsibility of their parent. According to Life Site News, "Abortion is a defining human-rights issue of our time.." (Ricker 1). Everyone stands up for their own human rights, but when it comes to abortion no one stands up for the baby’s human rights.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays