In Defense Of Abortion Essay

Improved Essays
In today’s societies around the world, there is currently two factions of the highly controversial topic of abortion and whether it should be allowed or outlawed. These two factions on opposite sides are pro-choice and pro-life. Pro-choice supporters in essence believes a woman has the right to an abortion if she decides to do so. On the other hand, pro-life supporters believe the fetus is its own human being and has the right to live, thus an abortion cannot be performed on the woman. Judith Jarvis Thomson, a philosophy professor supports the right to an abortion in her paper, “A defense of Abortion” (186). In this paper, she uses examples to try to explain why abortion is not an immoral act as she treats the fetus as an invader to the woman’s body. Some people however do not agree with Thomson’s depiction of how she defended why abortion should be allowed. With this in mind, I will try to argue that abortion is not an immoral act since women have the right to do whatever they so choose to do with their body, especially in the case that the fetus is as Thomson …show more content…
For example, most women in general did not want the baby to begin with. Like I had said, they took precautions by using some form of birth control in order to have a high chance of not getting pregnant. Even with the use of some form of birth control, they are sometimes defective and the woman may still end up pregnant. As to the objection that abortion is killing and thus morally wrong, I say that not all killings are morally wrong. For example, self-defense is justifiable as a means to defend yourself (191). The unwelcomed fetus has invaded the woman’s body and is “stealing” in a sense that it is taking nutrients from your body without consent (195). With this, it should not be declared morally wrong to have an

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Although abortion is not the same as a premature death, it still deprives the foetus of a future, similar to how death does. With this, Marquis attempts to sidestep a controversial premise of other arguments against abortions that suggest a foetus is a person with rights. By focusing on the future potential of the foetus. Marquis is able to sidestep a common controversial premise of other familiararguments against abortion that deal with the foetus’s status as a potential person and the rights potential people have. 4.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So during certain circumstances the right to abortion is vital for women. Every woman has a right to own their own body, and a fetus is part of the woman’s body. Therefore a pregnant woman has the right to abort the…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is an immensely controversial topic in today’s society. Jarvis Thomson makes many arguments on the topic of abortion in the writing of “A Defense of Abortion”. In today’s society, there are many different stances on abortion that include a variety of concepts and situations to consider. Jarvis Thomson says that abortion can be permissible. Many people can concure to that saying babies are innocent and do not mean to harm a mother, but a mother has a right to her body.…

    • 1769 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is the planned termination of a human pregnancy. Several philosophers and activists have argued over if it is permissible. The author of A Defense of Abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson, is correct about her argument that abortion is permissible even if the fetus is a person. This is because a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, which, combined with the woman’s own right to life, takes precedent over a fetus’s right to life. Even if people claim that she gave the fetus permission to be there, she should not be forced into going against her right to bodily autonomy.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dan Marquis proposes that it is wrong to kill a fetus for the same reason that it is wrong to kill a person: killing them would deprive them of their future of value. I want to argue, however, that this reasoning cannot be used to conclude that all abortions are impermissible. In particular, I argue that Marquis does not give us good reason to think that abortions that occur within the first 25 weeks of pregnancy are impermissible. The paper will include two main arguments. Firstly, I will argue that, even if Marquis’s proposal for why it is wrong to kill a person is correct, abortions during very early stages of pregnancy are morally permissible because, in these stages, there is nothing that has a future of value.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy is the application of ethical approaches to issues, controversies, theories, and ideas. It is in one’s nature to seek answers to questions which are asked. It is also in one’s nature to question and decide if an idea or ideal is right or wrong, but in the case of ethics; permissible or impermissible. In this text, we are going to use these terms as acceptable or permitted and vice-versa. In this essay, we will be analyzing the article, “A Defense of Abortion” by philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thompson.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She suggests that because a pregnancy is such a great sacrifice, that, while women should carry a child to term after becoming pregnant, we cannot require them to do so. This argument also requires that the fetus’ right to life is subject to the mother’s whim and does not carry as much weight as the first two arguments. Thomson concludes the article by saying that she is not attempting to delineate the circumstances in which a pregnancy might be morally permissible and those in which it isn’t, but rather to make it clear that even if we consider a fetus to be a person, that abortion can still be morally permissible. This weakens her argument a great deal, instead of providing a proscriptive criterion to base the morality of abortion on, she simply provides what may be a series of fringe cases to establish that while abortion is normally wrong, it isn’t always so. Thomson’s argument on abortion is fundamentally deontological.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis publishes his argument “Why Abortion Is Immoral” operating under the assumption that the moral status of the fetus stands or falls on the question of whether or not it is the sort of being whose life it is seriously wrong to take. He notes that he does not argue for cases that involved special situation pregnancies like implantation or those that threaten the life of the women, but only ‘most’ cases. His argument is a significant change from many other anti-abortion arguments because Marquis attempts to distance himself from the assumption that a fetus is a person. Instead, he uses what he titles the “future-like-ours” argument.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will be discussing Patrick Lee’s and Robert George’s position that because of the moral duty one has to make sacrifices for others, the right to abortion is only held by those whose lives are put in danger in bringing the fetus to full term. I will then refute this stance in expanding the criteria of when one has the right to abortion. In their paper, “The Wrong of Abortion”, Lee and George tackle the morality of abortion claiming it to be “objectively immoral” (Lee and George, 2014 p. 37). In proving this thesis, they set out to rebut the bodily rights argument that states that though the unborn fetus has the right to life by virtue of being a human, they are not entitled to use their mother’s bodies as a means…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Performing the abortion would be directly killing the child, whereas doing nothing would not be killing the mother, but letting her die.” The conclusion that is drawn from this scenario is that your own right to life gives you the moral right to “unplug” yourself if your life is threatened. Equally, if there is a risk of the mother dying, she has a right to end the pregnancy in order to save herself. It cannot be considered murder to kill someone in order to save yourself. This analogy shows the extreme view to be false.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Abortion A Woman ’s Right? A very controversial topic in the world, still today, is abortion.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most intricate writers on the subject of abortion all believe that whether or not abortion is morally permissible stands or falls on whether or not a fetus is the sort of being whose life it is seriously wrong to end. The purpose of this paper isn’t to address the greater ethics of abortion such as abortion before implantation or abortion when the life of a woman is threatened by a pregnancy; rather I seek to address the general argument for the claim that the overwhelming majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral. I which to investigate further Don Marquis claim that I something is living its wrong to kill it. If this were true people that are dying from disease would believe that they loss a future and all the experiences that they would have had. The second one is that killing alone is wrong because it automatically takes away the greatest loss, which is their life.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Abortion is the act of purposely killing a human fetus. This action is legal in the United States of America due to the differing opinions regarding it. In this essay, I will discuss whether, or not abortion is morally permissible. If Abortion is in fact morally permissible, is it permissible in all or just some situations? I will argue that abortion is only morally correct in cases of a fetus having a severe genetic disorder and when the mother’s life is in danger.…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One reason abortion is a social issue is because people don’t know whether it should be either illegalized or legalized everywhere. Tom Anderson says,” if abortions become illegalized then it will have a significant impact on women and would cause society to become like the third world. ”(Anderson,3) Which he describes as a place where the population suffers from poverty, malnutrition, treatable disease, poor health care, unemployment and lastly a place where women feel little empowerment concerning their reproductive lives. (Anderson, 3).…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abortion should not be legalized because it is the taking of a human life. Abortion cause psychological damage to women who choose to abort their babies. Abortion can also lead to a serious health complication and in some cases the worst case scenario can be death. Instead of aborting a babies and having the risk of losing your own life, it would be easier and better to give the infant to somebody that will take care them and love. Women that are aborting babies are having the risk of not being able to become pregnant ever again in life.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays