Arguments Against Don Marquis

Great Essays
Because of the moral standards of society, abortions are becoming a more controversial issue. In this paper, I intend to argue against Don Marquis’s argument that a fetus’ having a potential “future just like ours” is a sufficient statement for claiming that “abortion is, except possibly in rare cases, seriously immoral, that it is in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (p.183). I will first explain Marquis’ “future just like ours” theory which is used to prove his argument that abortion is wrong. While Marquis claims that a future is a natural property that is attached to fetuses and any human beings, I want to argue that there is a difference between future and the natural property. Second, I want to argue against his statement …show more content…
Let’s assume that a fetus has been diagnosed with a lifetime illness and it will have to suffer the permanent pain with treatment until death. You might say it is necessary to keep the fetus and give it life-prolonging treatment, but it might not suffice for calling a valuable future. When Marquis talks about a future like ours, all he mentions is enjoyment, a valuable experience. However, we all know that in the reality, there is another side of experiences that should be considered. That could involve tragedy, pain, suffering or misfortune in life. Besides Marquis’s positive, valuable future, can terrible life experience also be called a “valuable” …show more content…
I have to admit that Marquis’s argument is strong and clever. He avoids the traditional “personhood/sanctity of life” debates and the unusual circumstances that can easily form a forum. In order to establish there is not sufficient condition of the wrongness of killing some being, I mainly focus on arguing against Marquis’ crucial moral category “having a valuable future like ours” in his argument. In addition, I clam that the fetus does not justify as a human being nor have a desire to go on living. Therefore, it will not consider as killing nor moral impermissibility of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is wrong, but no one should be judged for the actions and/or decisions they make. Every human being that breathes, walks, and thinks, can decide what to do with their body. In this paper I agree with Don Marquis’s view of abortion. Abortion is wrong because it deprives the fetus from its future. In other words, abortion is wrong because killing a future child stops it from growing and making a difference to their lives.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is an emotive and controversial topic that raises political, ethical and social debates. According to Dictionary.com, “abortion is the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, usually before the embryo or fetus is capable of independent life; most often performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy.” In this paper, I’ll explain the main legal and ethical issues surrounding abortions. Also, I will provide a case that has to deal with abortion. Ethical questions mainly stem from religious, social and professional dimensions.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marquis argues that the way Warren’s view of personhood is wrong. He states that “if we take it quite literally, it is too narrow. Someone who is asleep is no conscious, is not reason, and is not exhibiting self-motivated activity. A final point that Marquis mention he says “individual future of value at a given age is one’s potential at that age to live to a greater age and to have a future life that on would value.” He’s saying if we get rid of that one life which is the fetus is basically taking her future value of her life away.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marquis argues that killing a fetus deprives it of a valuable future/future like ours, and concludes by saying abortion is not morally permissible. I agree with Marquis’ argument that it is wrong to kill a fetus through abortion because I believe that they have a valuable future as all humans do. While I agree with Marquis that majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral, I do believe that in some cases it is permissible. For instance, choosing to have an abortion after being sexually assaulted or due to life threatening circumstances would be acceptable reasons for having an abortion. Being that the loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses that can occur, I strongly concur with Marquis’s argument.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis argues in his article An Argument that Abortion is Wrong that abortion, except in specific rare instances is seriously wrong. He bases this claim off of the principle that killing any innocent human being is wrong. While the central point of most pro-choice individuals is that women should have the right to control their body, Marquis argues that the right of the unborn fetus outweighs the right for a woman to control her body. Before supporting his thesis Marquis lays out one of the main problems in the abortion debate. People in favor of abortion often have a very narrow view on what constitutes a person and this is problematic because it leaves out infants, severely retarded and mentally ill individuals.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Marquis essay he argues that abortion is not right because killing the fetus is like killing an adult. Throughout the essay he questions that if it is right to kill a fetus it is right to kill living human. He then gives us the example of why it is wrong to kill a human. Marquis says that if you kill a human who has been alive that you are taking away their future and something valuable from them. You are ruining future possibilities of that person and he then ties that with the reason of why it is wrong to kill a fetus.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomson Abortion Analysis

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nevertheless, Marquis states that there needs to be a clear basis in which a person has the right personhood, to know on what grounds a fetus is considered a person. Marquis goes on to say that, the reasoning for why it’s wrong to kill is because the person that was killed lost the right to a life of actions and emotion they would have had otherwise. That being said Marquis claims that all animals have a right to life as well as humans. This goes without saying that fetuses have a right to a future worth living like everyone else, even if they are not considered…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay “Why Abortion is Immoral,” philosopher Don Marquis uses utilitarian principles to argue that “abortion is, except in rare cases, seriously immoral… [and] in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (223). However, he deliberately avoids relating his thesis to abortion in the specific contexts of rape, maternal death, and severe postpartum health complications. Thus, in my analysis of his claim, I plan on adopting Marquis’ utilitarian perspective to evaluate the permissibility of abortion in regard to these delicate scenarios. I will begin my paper by giving a brief summary of “Why Abortion is Immoral.”…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Permissibility of Abortion: Noonan V. Thompson The topic of abortion has been of much dispute throughout time. Some seeing abortion as the mother’s right to choice, others as murder. Most pro-life supporters argue that fetuses have the right to life and to aborting it is murder. Judith Thompson concedes that fetuses may have the right to life but that only gives the fetus a right to not be unjustly killed.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mary Anne Warren presents her argument for abortion, first, by replying to Thomson’s argument with falsehoods she gathered from his premises. The largest opposition Warren had with Thompson, was based upon the statement he made that allowed for abortion to be permissible even if the fetus has a full right to life. Warren argues that there cannot be an argument for abortion if it is believed that a fetus has a full right to life, because an abortion would immediately dismiss this. In Warren’s argument, she focuses heavily on defining personhood and the moral status that coincides with it, and the lack of both in a fetus. I am going to argue on behalf of Warren, however adding the argument that a fetus does not have full moral status, while an infant does, in hopes to respond to the issue of infanticide.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the first place, this theory explains why we regard killing as one of the worst of crimes. (190)”. He uses this point to argue that what makes killing wrong is the loss of the value of the victim 's future. Again, I mention that he does not take into account the mother’s future that this fetus will intrude on.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy is the application of ethical approaches to issues, controversies, theories, and ideas. It is in one’s nature to seek answers to questions which are asked. It is also in one’s nature to question and decide if an idea or ideal is right or wrong, but in the case of ethics; permissible or impermissible. In this text, we are going to use these terms as acceptable or permitted and vice-versa. In this essay, we will be analyzing the article, “A Defense of Abortion” by philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thompson.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis publishes his argument “Why Abortion Is Immoral” operating under the assumption that the moral status of the fetus stands or falls on the question of whether or not it is the sort of being whose life it is seriously wrong to take. He notes that he does not argue for cases that involved special situation pregnancies like implantation or those that threaten the life of the women, but only ‘most’ cases. His argument is a significant change from many other anti-abortion arguments because Marquis attempts to distance himself from the assumption that a fetus is a person. Instead, he uses what he titles the “future-like-ours” argument.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The two approaches bifurcate due to one critical assumption; who exactly has a right to life? I will explore what it means to have a “right to life”, and use my findings to evaluate both Marquis’ arguments in his essay, “Why Abortion Is Immoral” and Warren’s arguments in her essay, “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion”. I will consider some potentially conflicting extensional results on both moral theories, and critique the authors’ responses to each. It must be clarified that abortion, in the ethical sense, refers to “normal” abortion, that is, free of contexts such as…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite the horrifying reality linked to abortion, the debate about allowing abortion in a moral society has never ceased. There are various ethical theories that would support abortion based on some arguments. The theory argues that the moral rightness is based on the total good the consequences of a certain activity (Sinnott-Armstrong, 1). According to the consequentialist ethical theory, a consequentialist would first enquire on the consequences allowing the abortion and not allowing abortion. The people who support this theory would want to know the action that would produce the greatest goodness for either the child or the mother.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics