Women serving in the U.S. military, in direct ground combat roles lower the effectiveness of a combat unit. This isn’t to say that women should not serve in the military or even in support of combat operations. …show more content…
In his article, he critiques a video of a female soldier completing a 12-mile hike. In the video, the female solider can be seen falling to the ground and struggling to get to her feet several times. There is a three-hour time limit for completing this task, per the Army prerequisite tactical foot march, and she finishes with about fifteen minutes to spare. The instructions for the hike also dictate that the candidates must carry their rifles in a ready position, meaning that the weapon must be ready for use against enemy combatants. Streiff tells us that “the 12-mile forced march is not a ceiling to be sought, it is a floor of expectations”. In other words, she should be ready to continue on after the hike and engage the enemy if necessary. This is clearly not the case, as she can be seen utilizing her weapon as a crutch rather than a tool of …show more content…
Military service is required by law in Israel and there are no positions that are not open to women. Rowan Scarborough takes a deeper look at this topic in an article written for The Washington Times. He tells us that Israeli women are portrayed as being in ground combat units, but that isn’t entirely the case. They do not serve in direct combat special operations, comparable to our Navy Seals, Army Rangers, or Marine Corps Infantry. Israeli women serve within two battalions that guarding the borders of Egypt and Jordan. These also happen to be the only Arab countries under a peace treaty with Israel. Elaine Donnelly, head of Center for Military Readiness, is quoted in this article for the