Rule utilitarianism

Decent Essays
Improved Essays
Superior Essays
Great Essays
Brilliant Essays
    Page 8 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is a branch of metaethics that focuses on the ideas of consequences, self interest, and unbiasedness. Instead of determining if an action is moral through the immediate effects, Utilitarianism skimps over the short term and instead focuses on the long term effects of actions. Actions are no longer based on intention but, rather the overall effects from those actions determines if the parent event was morally good or bad. Utilitarianism also emphasizes the idea that an individual’s…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is the most well-known consequentialist theory which are theories that hold the idea that actions are right or right according to the balance of their good and bad consequences (354). Utilitarianism states that we are morally obligated to act in ways that bring the best consequences. Following that idea you become morally responsible for all the actions that you did not do, but could have in order to maximize happiness, all the actions you performed in which you prevented others…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is a moral principle that holds that the morally right course of action in any situation is the one that produces the greatest balance of benefits over harms for everyone affected. We might not notice it but most of us use this kind of morality every day in our lives. For the most part, utilitarianism is a very straightforward process to help us decide whether our moral reasons are correct or incorrect. In utilitarianism, we must always first determine all our possible outcomes of…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay I am writing today I will be comparing utilitarianism; also called consequentialism, and Kantian ethical theories. The attitude towards what is right or wrong is what constitutes the basic difference between the two theories. Utilitarianism says an act is justified if the end result is happiness for all. The Kantian theory states that end does not justify means, and whatever we do inside our obligations is morally good. The dilemma I used for this essay was under the Paradigm #4…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Stuart Mill, in Utilitarianism, explains his principle of utility and its importance to morality. Bernard Williams challenges Mill’s views by utilizing thought experiments and is ultimately successful in undermining some forms of utilitarianism. The principle of utility, according to Mill, is the idea that actions must produce the most happiness possible. Pain and the privation of pleasure are the direct opposites of Mill’s argument for the principle of utility, or his “First Principle.”…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brennan, Warren – PHI220 DL01 – Short Paper 1 Utilitarianism, as presented by Shafer-Landau, is an interesting ethical theory in that it presents the idea that at times it is immoral to act in a manner that we’ve been taught is moral. I will argue that Act Utilitarianism is a sound ethical theory and that it’s precepts are utilized in modern society despite many public figures making pronouncements against this behavior. Act Utilitarianism is sound because it allows its supporters to resolve…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    information? Some torture can be justified through utilitarianism. The Utilitarianism is a view where what 's acceptable and morally right is whatever is utility to happiness. Torture is the act of intentionally causing severe pain or suffering. There are different philosophical views on torture. The circumstances to make torture justified the information gained has to be more valuable then morals or the life. Torture can be justified through utilitarianism but it could also be justified to have…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is defined as the action taken that will maximize utility, or bring the most happiness to the people involved. There are two kinds of utilitarianism, act and rule. I shall refer to act as extreme and rule as restricted. In the following paper I will define extreme and restricted utilitarianism separately and then demonstrate how Smart establishes a difference between the two in the Desert Island Promise case and how Smart chooses extreme utilitarianism and what he ought to do in…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    involvement in her husband’s murder, commented on the life sentence being worse than the death penalty due to the sentence not having an end where as the death penalty does (SOURCE). As the death penalty is yet to be found as an effective deterrent, utilitarianism cannot justify the actions of the killing of one to potentially benefit the broader society. However, utilitarians can justify the death penalty as it removes the threat of the offender reoffending, allowing maximum happiness in the…

    • 1076 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarianism is the belief that an action has to focus on overall utility and maximize happiness or pleasure of the overall good in order to be moral. And the happiness of the majority is chosen over happiness or pleasure of the minorities. Utilitarianism takes a quantitative and reductionist measure to deal with ethics. It is the ethical theory that places the locus of right and wrong solely on the outcomes (consequences) of choosing one action/policy over other actions/policies.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Page 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 50