Examples Of Extreme Utilitarianism

Improved Essays
Utilitarianism is defined as the action taken that will maximize utility, or bring the most happiness to the people involved. There are two kinds of utilitarianism, act and rule. I shall refer to act as extreme and rule as restricted. In the following paper I will define extreme and restricted utilitarianism separately and then demonstrate how Smart establishes a difference between the two in the Desert Island Promise case and how Smart chooses extreme utilitarianism and what he ought to do in the situation and not what he thinks he should do.

First, extreme utilitarianism is defined as the action token that maximizes utility. In other words, your action, the optimific action, should produce the most utility possible in the situation. With
…show more content…
The rule in this case to follow is to keep promises. Following the rule and keeping the promise in this instance is believed to maximize utility. You would be guilt free and you would make the jockey club, and your late friend, happy with the donation. The faith in promise keeping is not altered and you can remain a truthful person. When faced with a decision and there is limited time to think out the choices and a rule is in place that is fundamental to keep, it is obvious that you would follow the rule. But this is opposed by the extreme utilitarian and Smart gives an explanation of why restricted is …show more content…
Following the rule in this case, Smart believes, is not the best approach. He decides to break the promise and donate to the hospital believing that it is the better decision. Smart explains that following a rule that would produce less than maximum utility is irrational. Why not choose a better option and break the rule? In the Desert Island case, breaking the promise and donating to the hospital is believed to produce maximum utility, not keeping the promise. We can analyze the change in utility of giving to the hospital. You may feel guilty that you decided to disobey your friends wish, but you also feel pride that you donated to the hospital and made many people happy. Maybe the jockey club misses out on some cash and they can't buy what they want for an event but on the plus side, they do not know you broke the promise. Since again nobody knows that you broke the promise, the faith in promise keeping remains. When you can produce an action that will provide more utility than following a rule would, then it is acceptable to break the rule. Donating to the hospital would be the optimific action according to Smart and he would break the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    At the end, Smart tries to persuade the audience that restricted utilitarianism fall short to using common sense. Smart’s main ache is the rules that follow with restricted utilitarian. Smart’s vital debate cumulates in the British road system, in which the drivers drive on the opposite side of the. We in America drive on the right side and the British drive on the left side. Smart questions why the rule only has one answer; the answer being just…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Doctors are expected to give care to all their patients without judging their actions or private life. Similar to Antigone, I have been presented with a moral dilemma in which the options include saving the life of my best friend’s thirteen-year-old son, or saving the life of a woman that developed cirrhosis of the liver due to her abuse of alcohol and drugs. I have chosen to not alter the information that would place my friend’s son at the top of the transplant list, due to the responsibility and the oath I took, to care for every one of my patients. It would be dishonoring to only think of my friend and how the situation affects me personally, and not consider the woman’s family and how the sickness of their loved one affects them. Due to my selfishness, I would be punished by losing the ability to save more lives, and do what I…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4. How might utilitarianism be used to resolve dilemma 4 (pg. 132 of Jones)? Do you agree with this resolution? Why or why not?…

    • 1308 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Luckily the homeless person living their last days is a perfect donor match. The treatment for both people can take a drastic turn for one of those patients. When approaching such a case there are five viewpoints to consider when providing ethical treatment and considering ending one life for another. Overall, the question remains what would they do in this circumstance.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Narcotic Ethics In Prison

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages

    It could be an ethical dilemma in the sense that if that it was truly just a kind gesture than you put a black mark…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    ln both cases, at least one of Josephine's beliefs must be false. The man cannot be both short and tall (for a man). Hence, Josephine's beliefs on this topic ca¡not be reliable, since she uses a plocess that is inaccurate at least half the time. Thus, context framing effects also int¡oduce unreliability.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to this distinction, act and rule utilitarians have different responses to the two problems posed by Carritt. In response to the arctic explorers, act utilitarians would have a couple ways to defend utilitarianism. First, they could deny that the alleged consequences, the weakening of promises and justice, are genuine consequences. In order to do this, the act utilitarian would have to claim that an error was made in assessing the consequences. It is possible that not all the relevant consequences were considered, and that a true consideration of all consequences would result in different consequences where Carritt’s criticism would be irrelevant.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Final Exam 1. In “A Critique of Utilitarianism”, Bernard Williams argues against the fundamental characteristics of utilitarianism and believes that the notion of ends justifying the means are a way of representing the doctrine of negative responsibility which can lead to consequences from the choices we make/do not make (663). As a result, we are all responsible for the consequences that we fail to prevent as well as the ones we brought upon ourselves. That is, in each case the choice on whether an action is right is determined by its consequences (661). Williams gives the example of killing one villager to save 19 others (664) in which he critiques the different principles of utilitarianism and integrity - the moral righteousness that is…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the branch of normative ethics, a person discerns what is right or wrong behavior. There are several theories about what is right or wrong conduct, but two of the most popular ideas is Utilitarianism and Kantianism. Both set up strict methods of deciding how a person would know what the right thing to do in a situation would be. On one hand, utilitarianism claims that you can use intuition to discern what the greatest good for the greatest number of people is. On the other side, Kantianism claims that you can use reasoning and logic to discern moral obligations and rules.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is the idea that "moral action should be about producing happiness in the world, the more happiness it produces, the better it is" (Garcia, Slide 6). The idea of Utilitarianism can be broken down into two forms; One being Act Utilitarianism and the second being Rule Utilitarianism. Act Utilitarianism is when "an act is morally right just because it maximizes overall well-being, or at least is expected to" (Garcia, Slide 6), while Rule Utilitarianism is when "actions are morally right just because they would be required by social rules that are created to promote overall well-being" (Garcia, Slide 6). In addition to Utilitarianism's break down it has a moral standard that is true to both forms, known as the Principle of Utility.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of an action. Endowing to the classical utilitarian moral theory, we classify human acts or practices as we consider neither the nature of the acts or practices nor the motive for which people do what they do. This can harvest to one’s action; that a life conceivably is saved, which matters morally. There is no total distinction between what is right and what is wrong based on Bentham’s view, only if the consequences are the highest favorable for the person’s greatest happiness, even including the majority of the people related to this person who is responsible to give that action. Drawing a conclusion about utilitarianism, it is our duty to decide which action or practice is best by considering the likely or actual consequences of each substitute.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because rule utilitarianism relies on moral rules to determine the permissibility of actions, it has the resources to avoid the problems act utilitarianism faces concerning individual rights by establishing rules that prohibit infringement of individual rights. For instance, one should not enslave others because, in most instances, slavery has more negative outcomes than not enslaving others. Therefore if not enslaving others was a rule, rule utilitarianism would consider all slavery immoral, regardless if individual cases of slavery would yield more good outcomes. In more instances than not, violating individual rights results in a lower utility, therefore, the majority of moral rules align with our individual rights and intuitive moral verdicts. Thus, rule utilitarianism has the resources to prohibit the problems that act utilitarianism faces concerning infringement of individual rights.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To begin with, the utilitarian standpoint indicates that ethically sound actions are experienced when they generate excellence for the greatest number. In this case, an action needs to be examined according to the degree of benefit or limitation it contributes as well as the influences on all parties involved (Baron, 2003). The perspective is meant to alleviate harm and optimize benefit by utilizing the approach of obtaining the greatest good for the greatest number. Precisely, the utilitarian standpoint is all about making decisions that cut across the needs of all involved…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bernard Williams’s example of the moral dilemma involving Jim killing the one individual to save 19 is an interesting one that provokes much thought and it is a decision that utilitarian followers would find quite easy. Utilitarian’s subscribe to the view that everything that you do or do not do should be for the sake of maximizing total happiness, or utility. But individuals who subscribe to a different moral philosophy could potentially have a myriad of ethical concerns associated with making such a decision. In this paper, I will explain the moral dilemma that is presented in Bernard Williams’s piece, hypothesize what the utilitarian would do in that situation, why they would choose to do that. I will also demonstrate why Williams’s dilemma provides valid evidence to reject utilitarianism on the grounds that it weakens a person’s integrity, sense of responsibility, and their moral character.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And they use a direct utility calculation: when you are in an unusual situation that the rules don’t cover, when the subordinate rules conflict, when you are deciding which rules to adopt or…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays