Pros And Cons Of Rule Utilitarianism

Improved Essays
Because rule utilitarianism relies on moral rules to determine the permissibility of actions, it has the resources to avoid the problems act utilitarianism faces concerning individual rights by establishing rules that prohibit infringement of individual rights. For instance, one should not enslave others because, in most instances, slavery has more negative outcomes than not enslaving others. Therefore if not enslaving others was a rule, rule utilitarianism would consider all slavery immoral, regardless if individual cases of slavery would yield more good outcomes. In more instances than not, violating individual rights results in a lower utility, therefore, the majority of moral rules align with our individual rights and intuitive moral verdicts. Thus, rule utilitarianism has the resources to prohibit the problems that act utilitarianism faces concerning infringement of individual rights. Although rule utilitarianism is better than act utilitarianism in this regard, it faces other problems regarding exceptional scenarios. According to rule utilitarianism, there are certain moral rules we are obligated to follow like to always tell the truth. In most situations following moral rules maximizes good outcomes, however in certain scenarios this is not necessarily the case. A possible …show more content…
Like act utilitarianism, it appealing because it maximizes good outcomes, however, it does so by establishing strict moral rules. By establishing moral rules, rule utilitarianism avoids the conflicts act utilitarianism faces with individual rights and the difficulty of calculating utility. It aligns with our intuitive moral verdicts more often and prevents people from making errors in moral judgements, therefore, rule utilitarianism is the better utilitarianistic moral

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarian Vs Mill

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The reason why it is better is because the Kantian approach seems more practical for real world situations than the utilitarian does. It forces the person to think and be conscious of the intentions and the actions that one carries out. If one thinks of it as becoming a universal law that they cannot be exempt from, then they are less likely to commit an action that is considered morally wrong. The utilitarian encourages the individual to seek aggregate happiness for themselves and the group, and to ensure that it happens through any way possible. This opens the possibility to using harmful acts, such as murder, cheating and lying to ensure that group happiness is existent in a large amount.…

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    would give us nothing but the overall best consequences. Further, utilitarianism explains why we should treat people justly, not violate their rights and keep our promises. Because doing so promotes good consequences. Far from being incompatible with common sense, utilitarianism is common sense. In chapter 8 of Rachels’ book he had replied that sometimes ignoring moral common sense does bring about good results and so utilitarianism sometimes does disrupt common sense.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They acknowledge that there rules of thumbs, but sometimes absolute obedience to the rules don’t apply all the time. In addition, there can be conflict at times. Moral understanding and moral wisdom are needed to deal with particular situations. According to virtue ethics, this can only be gained through training, experience, and practice. This account of moral knowledge differs from other accounts given because of the way it views morality and what it deems as morally right.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rather, as long as it makes more people happy than unhappy, it is morally right. It creates an unjust court for the innocent who could be accused by a greater number. The nature of morality of an act for Mill is its consequence which applies only for the greater number. According to Mill, people are still able to be moral even if the moral path doesn 't make them happy because of internal penalty. These rules ensure a person fulfills his or her utilitarian duty, which is ensuring decisions made about actions that cause the least amount of suffering for the fewer amount of people.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am not one to usually agree that lying is ok but would have to agree that this situation would justify doing so. The utilitarian theory is focused on the overall outcome of the group vs the ethical theory being focused on the outcome of the individual so I would have to stand behind utilitarianism on this situation. The Utilitarian ethic seems more compelling and correct, in my opinion. I see utilitarianism as more of the maximize happiness and minimize suffering but don’t do so in a way that negatively affects someone else if you can prevent it, theory. Utilitarianism looks at everyone, not just yourself.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Truth Is Good Analysis

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Other virtues, such as morality, are sometimes more important than the truth. To explain these instances Lynch breaks down good into two basic ways something can be considered good, good all things considered, and prima facie good (Lynch 46). Prima facie good is good when all things are equal, this is the category that truth falls under according to Lynch. An example of prima facie good, is the belief that all truths should be pursued, this belief is normally good unless it would require the death of millions or other moral issues. In this case morality trumps the pursuit of truth.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Intrinsic goodness are things that are worthwhile because there are good in themselves that are not good because they lead to other good things. Same thing with things that are intrinsically bad, they are bad in themselves not because they lead to other bad things. When trying to decide what action to do, actual consequence generic act utilitarians believe that we should do the thing or side with the thing that is the most morally right, we should do the thing that will bring us the most happiness/pleasure or the least amount of unhappiness with the least amount of consequences. They believe that we should do whatever is the most morally right thing to…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is an agent centred theory, rather than act centred, so we do not know which actions are good for us. Hursthouse stated that " it is concerned with Being than rather Doing" good or bad and therefore through being good we are actively doing good so the problem does not arise. However, the theory relies on a good judgment of character and a huge amount of trust in individuals. This could be problematic for both the person trusting the "virtuous" man and also for the virtuous individuals themselves. Having these moral powers comes with responsibility to perform the most virtuous outcome and vulnerability to blame if the outcome is not satisfactory.…

    • 2146 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Usually, cultural and personal influences influence an individual’s perspective to the most appropriate or ethically correct course of action. Utilitarianism does not extinguish this completely as these factors would continue to influence individual views to what cause would create happiness. However, it offers the people the ability to view what is morally right from a combined assessment of what is ethically right or evil, instead of on a limited, personal level. It creates the link for an individual to identify what actions cause others happiness or pain and shows that situations are not limited to the affects on us, only. While he consideration of others is needed to decide which action is the most ethically right, it cannot be limited to that.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Their are so many different philosophies and theories on what is the ethical right and wrong, that is hard for an average person to make a decision that will not be question or debated. The belief that moral absolutism is the best choice is unrealistic because it works in theory but in the real world it will most likely fail, but Utilitarianism can be a good alternative to making moral decisions. Moral absolutism view actions as being right…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays