Reasonable suspicion

Just about everyone in here plays some type of sport. Correct? Think about the people you know who play a sport and are on illegal drugs or are drinking. This is why student athletes should be drug tested. Students should be tested because playing a sport opens lots opportunities and the government supports it. However, some people say this is an invasion of privacy, Multiple kids will benefit from everyone being tested. Sports open many opportunities up for scholarships to colleges. In…

The war on drugs is an ongoing battle that will never cease to exist. For six years straight more than 60 percent of students reported that their high schools are “drug infected”. Even private schools have been disturbed by this addiction. I feel that every school system has the right to search student lockers and backpack while they are in the building as long as it's for the well being of other students. A new study by the National Center on Addiction and Substance use shows that 17 percent of…

up the sport. The first step in this process is catching and punishing dirty fighters. So far, it appears to be pretty successful. First were a few fighters that didn’t pass the eye test, that is, just looking at the fighter’s physic raised the suspicion of PED use: Hector Lombard, Yoel Romero, Gleison Tibau. Although Tibau and Romero still claim their innocence, few likely believe them. The most recent fighter to test positive, however, doesn’t fail the eye test. I have serious doubts that…

items related to terrorism. They do not need reasonable grounds to suspect that items will be found.” Under section 41 of the act, police are allowed to arrest individuals without a warrant. In the film, the act was signified unjust when Gerry is arrested in the middle of the night when the police invade his home. The police had no proper evidence to tie him with the bombing, besides unreasonable suspicion. Paul was also arrested without any reasonable evidence. The arresting of Gerry, Paul and…

However, in order for a stop and frisk to be considered permissible by law, the officers present are required to have reasonable suspicion that criminal activity has been, is, or is in the process of being committed. Furthermore, police and other members of law enforcement are only able to perform a frisk on a suspect if they have reason to believe the individual may have dangerous…

proactive policing tactics such as stop and frisk, and other cities like Los Angeles and Philadelphia followed soon after. Stop and frisk is one type of policing. It is where police officers are allowed to stop citizens in public areas under reasonable suspicion of crime behavior, make inquiries and if they feel threatened frisk for weapons. This police tactic was first put into use in the 1960s with the purpose of removing illegal guns from the streets. Recently, law enforcements around the…

legally prescribe drugs and medications that if one takes to much of it can kill. Doctors will not be held a countable for this because it's a label of directions that the states the amount to be taken a day.When doctors prescribe the drug there is no suspicion that it's not a drug. If it was a surgical doctor with a knife this doctor would know all the possible areas to kill someone quickly. Today doctors would have a harder time trying to kill someone due to the fact that…

irrelevant whether they were aware of insolvency of the company. (Powell v Fryer (2001)) If a person is in the position of director in the company, ability to be aware of reasonable grounds for suspicion of insolvency / future insolvency is expected. (s 558G (2) • Susan was aware of account payable were post-dating cheques and had reasonable grounds for suspecting company’s financial position is not simply temporary lack of liquidity but rather gradual shortage of working capital whereby…

on said premises without the need for a warrant and to be able to use as much force necessary to prevent family violence on a request from a person who resides on the premises; or the officer is allowed to enter the premises if the said officer reasonable suspects that family violence is being, has been, or likely to be committed on premises (Australian Government, 2010). If they were to enter a property for any other reason other than listed above, they could be liable for being sued by the…

The state is a system of authority over a group of people, usually in the arrangement of a formal government, meant to organize the people and resolve conflicts between individuals. This paper will explore the ways the state of nature justifies the creation of the state as the state of nature is the world without a government. The state of nature is the alternative to the state since it lacks a system of authority. Specifically, the Hobbesian state of nature will be used for this argument since…