Factorial experiment

know what they are doing is unethical? Who was Involved The obedience study was conducted in an interesting fashion. Milgram sought to understand if normal people would shock others when they were told to do so. There were 2 main roles in the experiment: the teacher and the learner. The teacher is the one who would ask basic questions to the learner and the learner would have to guess the correct answer. If they guessed wrong, the teacher would administer the next highest shock to the learner.…

In 1963 soon after the Holocaust, Stanley Milgram executed an experiment to document and test human behaviors. The test was to see how far and individual would go to inflict pain on another human when in the company of an authority figure. 40 subjects applied through a newspaper ad and were paired together as a teacher and student. The student however, was an actor stating he had a heart condition and was concerned the test would affect it. Before the test started he was replaced with a…

has been rejected subsequent to being discovered blameworthy of 16 tallies of scientific wrongdoing by a review panel and accused him after examining his scientific experiments and research papers published. The board's report concluded that Jan Hendrik Schon duplicated, falsified and destroyed the data he showed in his experiment. A reckless disregard for the importance of data in the valued system of science. In the past a rising star in the field…

Zimbardo Assignment The Stanford Prison Experiment was a psychological study of human replication to captivity, in cognation to the authentic circumstances of prison life. It was conducted in August 1971 by Phillip Zimbardo, a psychologist at Stanford University. Subjects were desultorily assigned, by the flip of a coin, to play the role as prisoner or the role as a prison sentinel. Those assigned to play the role as the sentinel were given night sticks, a whistle, and mirrored sunglasses to…

The Stanford Prison Experiment The Stanford Prison Experiment is unethical and inhuman. It is also evidently a product of poor decision-making. If the scholar involved had considered using two individuals to take the roles of primary experimenter and prison superintendent, the experiment would not have advanced to the levels it did. Moreover, this independent individual would have interfered with the direction the experiment was taking. The experiment also shows the importance of an oversight…

The general reaction that I had toward this study was disgust and disappointment. The disgust was directed toward the relationship between authority figures and the inmates. Be it the guards or the "prison" superintendent, there were major flaws in this study that opened a flood gate of unethical practices. As for the disappointment, that reaction was solely triggered by the Zimbardo, the "prison superintendent". The manner in which these young men were allowed to treat their peers for the sake…

When the Milgram’s experiment is discussed most people consider the study unethical, but the real question is, is it really unethical? As was stated on simplypsychology, by Mclead “Stanley Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person.” To do so, he picked out random people and put them in a situation where an authority controls them. However, he told the participants they are a part of a study examining the effects…

In this section, Chen and Yang describe their experimental treatments and discuss how they measure and translate the outcomes. In the experiment, all participants are students from a top university and an average university in Beijing. Among these participants, Chen and Yang let students who have already regularly use tools to bypass censorship be benchmark to interpret the treatment effects. They randomly assign the rest students to either a control condition in which they are subject to…

Stanford Prison Experiment Domenica Urquidi Psychology  Stanford Prison Experiment The Stanford Prison Expirement was started in 1971 by Philip Zimbardo. This experiment is very well known in the history of psychology due to it's crazy results. The experiment was made to see the reaction of participants who were placed as situational variables. The variables were guards and prisoners. The research experiment took place in the basement of Stanford University. Chosen participants were from a…

the different role of authority and obedience in a simulated prison he created, this was also true in the film “Stanford prison Experiment,” bother film and research were very similar, but the film not only show how the groups conform to their roles but also the warden, he became so hungry in finding answer to his questions that he would stop at nothing. Thus, his experiment ended rather quickly. In the research of the simulated prisons, they randomly assigned male students that volunteered to…