Why Is The Stanford Prison Experiment Unethical

Decent Essays
The Stanford Prison Experiment
The Stanford Prison Experiment is unethical and inhuman. It is also evidently a product of poor decision-making. If the scholar involved had considered using two individuals to take the roles of primary experimenter and prison superintendent, the experiment would not have advanced to the levels it did. Moreover, this independent individual would have interfered with the direction the experiment was taking. The experiment also shows the importance of an oversight body to ensure that any experiment using human subjects ensures that none of their rights are abused. This experiment along with others served to highlight which areas needed oversight to ensure that people were not harmed in the course of an experiment.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Source A McLeod, Saul. Stanford Prison experiment. SimplyPsychology, 2008. Web. 12 Feb. 2016.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Lord of the Flies, the “bigguns” always had control and a higher title than the “littluns”. The younger children were almost hypnotised into believing anything the older children on the island said. Gaining this control came from the older boys on the island giving the younger children a feeling of protection and ability to survive. In society, a similar event takes place in the form presidential election along with other government positions. For example, when an individual runs for President, they make specific and important promises involving health care, immigration, educational advantages, etc.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 14th 1971, Philip Zimbardo got 24 healthy male students together and started the Stanford Prison Experiment. This experiment was held in Jordan Hall, which is Stanford University’s psychological building. The study was about observing the students’ psychological behavior as they were playing a role as a prisoner or a prison guard. Out of the 24, there were 12 prisoners and 12 guards (6 of which were alternatives), and they were all payed $15 everyday to be apart of all this for 7-14 days. Zimbardo himself took part in this experiment as a superintendent.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was a proposed two-week experiment that turned into a six day nightmare. “The original intent was to study whether the behavior of prisoners and guards was dispositional or situational” (McLeod, 2008). However, what they got out of the experiment was a “situation in which prisoners were withdrawing and behaving in pathological ways” and where some of the guards “were behaving sadistically” (Zimbardo). The Stanford Prison Experiment is one of the most controversial studies ever conducted in the “history of social psychology” (Konnikova, 2015). The results of this experiment show the truth of how absolute power corrupts absolutely, why good people do bad things, and how it can be applied to real life situations (Dalberg-Acton).…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1971, an experiment took place in Stanford, California. It was named the Stanford Prison Experiment, lasting what was meant to be two weeks, but due to the brutality of the trial, lasted a mere 6 days. Its purpose was to conduct a study on humanity and show just how evil a human can get when given a position of power. To summarize the experiment, a random 18 men were chosen, all innocent, good people who’d never committed a crime. They were divided into two groups erratically: 9 being “prisoners” and 9 being “guards.”…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This experiment went wrong and led to mental problems. These problems became so extreme that the experiment was discontinued after 6 days instead of 2 weeks. The Stanford Prison Experiment called into question the idea of Good vs Evil. The experiment showed how situational journey can cause an individual to “compromise” their beliefs. This change in behavior lead to psychological conflict among the “guards” and “prisoners.”…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Issues within the Stanford Prison Experiment The Stanford prison experiment was a controversial experiment in human behavior conducted at Stanford University in 1971. The experiment took twenty-four voluntary students and placed them in the role of either prison guard or prisoner, in a make shift prison that was constructed in the basement of the psychology department of Stanford University. The experiment was to last fourteen days but was terminated after six days due to the negative psychological impact on the participants (Haney, Banks, & Zimbardo (1973).…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment based on the roles of people, and how easily people will fall into those roles. The prisoners were stuck in the basement all day for 6 days, and both the guards and prisoners lost their morals and individuality. The act of dehumanization also provided the prisoners with fear, anger, and helplessness. The Stanford Prison Experiment was not a physical genocide, but a psychological genocide.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By conduction this experiment, Philip Zimbardo psychology professor and leader of the experiment, realized what the environment of a correctional facilitation is like. He also conducted this experiment in order to analyze the results of giving a normal person the right to authority. Giving one group authority and the other group no type human rights the experiment resulted into an unexpected turn of events. In this experiment professor Philip Zimbardo wanted to see how different jobs and roles, labels, and social expectation played a factor in the environment of a prison.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Stanford Prison Experiment” conducted in 1971 by Philip G. Zimbardo was looking for the answer to the question “What happens when you put good people in an evil place?”. This experiment studied the behavior of two groups consisting of young adults. The participants were given either the role of “Prison Guard” or“Prisoner” randomly. Essentially, this experiment’s goal is to find out if there is a correlation between a situation that puts people in a position of authority and power and their behavior. It is also important to note that the behavior of Philip G. Zimbardo also changed due to the authority and responsibility he had, taking on two influential roles in the experiment.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Secondarily discovered the experiment was the psychological impact of being in a verifiable position of power over ones’ peers, and how the ability to apply sanctions to those same peers can have an effect on one’s disposition. In order to unearth these effects, Professor Zimbardo collected 24 local Stanford students and gave a vague brief of the testing, including how they would be separated into ‘guards’ and ‘prisoners’. The students were randomly chosen for either role, and after only 6 days, their abusive actions from the guards towards the prisoners forced the experiment to be shutdown. The way the prisoner students were collected was an important factor in the experiment as a whole, having the arrested by a legitimate police force…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cloudy Judgment In 1971, Professor Phillip Zimbardo Ph.D. from Stanford University devised an experiment to test the willingness of people to conform to social roles in a simulated environment (McLeod, S. A. 2016). There were tons of applications the research team had to sort through settling on 24 college students who were broken up into two groups. The prison guard group who had no formal training on how to work as a prison guard or utilize law enforcement tactics, and the prisoner group. The first hours of the experiment had been uneventful and eventually lead to disturbing mental and physical abuse by the prison guard group.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment consisted on choosing 24 men of University of Stanford to play role as guards and prisoners in a fake prison built in the University basement. The experiment was conducted by the psychology professor Phillip Zimbardo, who wanted to investigate the difficulties caused in America penal system. He wanted to find out if the negative environment such as the prison would lead people with good personalities in acting different of what they usually do. Therefore, he would like to see if the students were going to assume the role of guards and prisoners, and how this would affect their behavior, because this position would give to the guards the sense of power over the other students, and the students assigned as prisoners…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    On August 14, 1971 Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment called the Stanford Prison Experiment took off. Young men were offered $15 a day to take part in a mock prison experiment in the basement of the Stanford University Psychology Department. The men were divided into either prison guards or prisoners, this experiment was only to last two weeks. Upon the prisoners arrival at the make shifted prison they were stripped off their clothes and sprayed with disinfecting spray. Each prisoner was issued a dress as a uniform with their prison identification number on the back and front.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted in 1971 by researcher, Philip Zimbardo is one of the most eye-opening social studies done to this day. It’s purpose was to find out more about how the social principles of obedience and conformity can affect the behavior of a normal human being. Zimbardo wanted to discover how social customs and hierarchy affect the roles people play, in a prison setting (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866). Though their purpose seems praiseworthy, the experiment itself was not. It was filled with ethical violations and in just 6 days, spun out of control (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866).…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays