Bystander Effect Experiment Unethical

Improved Essays
What makes an experiment unethical? An unethical experiment is an experiment that cause harm or that doesn’t benefit anyone. Most experiment that are unethical are not consider to be until years after the experiment is completed. The Belmont Report is what today researchers use in order to tell if an experiment is ethical or not. The Belmont report make sure an experiment follows three principles Respect for Persons, Beneficence, and justice. “before the creation of The Belmont Report, scientists had a bit of a free-for-all when it came to human experiments, and conducted projects that today would be deemed extremely unethical” (Dovey). With any experiment conducted there will be pro’s and con’s that come with them. With the article “5 Unethical …show more content…
An example of an experiment that provide good research is the Bystander Effect experiment. This experiment place college student in a room where they talked to a recording one of the recording told the student that he is prone to have seizures. Half way through the experiment the recording with the seizures would stop play, they tested to see how long it took for the student to seek help. With “Bystander Effect experiment we now better understand how humans react to a crisis when in a group, an important tool for law enforcement” (Dovey) providing more good than harm with this experiment. Another example is the Milgram experiment it “concluded that people will obey authority figures even in morally questionable circumstances and the experiment has led to many more studies on psychology of authority” (Green). Not only did the Milgram experiment an unethical experiment pave the way for future study on this, but it proved that people will do almost anything if an authority figure tells them to. Lastly the Stanford prison experiment even though the experiment was called off way before its two weeks where up it still provides a lot of good research. It conducted that “people will truly become any role they are given during the experiment the people task with the guard role became aggressive and abused their power” (Green). This shows why people given role like community leader or …show more content…
In the Bystander Effect experiment it gets called unethical because it was believed that participants had long lasting psychiatric problems for thinking that they harmed someone. Also at the begging of the experiment the researcher could not tell the participants their real goals since it might mess up the results of the experiment. the Belmont report would claim that this experiment will have a negative impact on the test participants. The Milgram experiment also lead their subject to believe that they were harming someone. To put the idea that the participants almost killed someone and never to fix the participants at the end of the experiment makes this experiment unethical. This may not be big traumatic event, but this experiment will still be carry with them leading them to have psychiatric problems later down the road. When it comes to the Stanford prison “experiment it was so unethical that it had to be stop on day six of their two-week experiment, and one of the participants had to leave earlier then that” (Green). the researcher did not care for his participants well-being by “allowed the guards to subject the prisoners to serious abuse and may cause them real permanent harm” (Green). these negative effects of these experiment may question the if the experiment is worth the information it gives

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Medical Practices

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Unethical experiments only lead to the mistrust of those that are affected and…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this is a largely simplistic view of the results of the experiments. The participants did not simply obey the person of authority named the experimenter. As demonstrated in the extensive video footage of the experiments, many of them exhibited great distress and tension, attempted to refuse participation, and tried to reason with the experimenter (Milgram, 1962). While it can be argued that a reasonable person could simply exit the room to leave or to check on the other participant receiving the shocks, the situation prevented this action, not physically, but psychologically. In turn, it may be argued that rather than obedience to orders, the participants of this study succumbed to incessant…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An experiment should not cause any harm to its participants, even if it is not physical, but mental. In the defense of Milgram, however, the debrief of the participants afterwards usually ensured a decrease in their stress level due to the knowledge that the learner was safe from harm. Therefore, the effects of tension were only short-term, and the debriefing usually solved their problems. The participants were assured that their behavior was common and that they were not sadistic or horrible people. About 83.7% of people stated that they were happy to be involved in the experiment, and only 1.3% wished that they hadn't gone through the experiment.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why do common people perform unethical acts? Yale psychologist, Stanley Milgram, researches human behavior and wrote about some of his findings in his article, "The Perils of Obedience. " In 1963, Milgram conducted a test using random subjects and actors in a fake electric chair. He gave the subject the power to increase the voltage of the electric chair and "shock" the actor as a form of punishment (Milgram 78).…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An ideal example of the emotional effect on prisoners is prisoner #8162. With less than 36 hours passing, #8162 began to suffer extreme emotional distress, sorrow, disorganized thinking, and anger. He became engulfed in the experiment and forgot that it was fake, telling other prisoners they cannot leave and then going on psychotic rages. Because of the severe effects he was suffering from, the researchers had not choice but to let him leave, making him understand that the prison was fabricated for an experiment that he volunteered for. Considering these findings, the conclusion for the Stanford Prison Experiment is that people will gladly conform to the social roles of their specific environment and take on the tendencies of their stereotyped roles (institutional power).…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people have the idea that during WW1 Nazis killed and tortured many Jews freely and even willingly. What Milgram is doing in his experiment is trying to figure out how easily people follow orders, orders that could harm and potentially kill someone. Milgram got participants through a newspaper article, and paying them $450 to complete the experiment (random sampling). The experiment was carried out in a lab at Yale, causing ecological validity to be good, as it 's a very trustworthy institution and subjects are more likely to abide when in a laboratory compared to a real world setting. He was using a deceiving method by tricking the “teacher” to believe that every time he flipped a set of 30 switches, which were ranged from Slight Shock…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    They began tormenting the prisoners, subjecting them to humiliating tasks, as well as verbal and physical punishments. The abuse quickly became so severe that Zimbardo prematurely terminated the study after only six days. The Stanford Prison experiment exemplifies how, given unrestrained power and with the group dynamics of groupthink and group polarization at play, good men can be lead to commit evil actions very…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    During the experiment, the experimenter (another actor) would encourage the teacher to keep giving shocks (which were fake), bringing in the idea of conforming to a higher power. Additionally, Philip G. Zimbardo wrote “The Stanford Prison Experiment” in which people were assigned a role and were either obedient or disobedient to authority. This experiment consisted of subjects who were randomly assigned to play the role of “prisoner” or “guard.” The guard’s role was similar to the teacher’s role in the Milgram experiment in which these two groups of people were to be in control of the other individual’s life. But why do people consciously decide to cast their morals away and follow authority figures?…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiments created great controversy. They showed how vulnerable humans were to the will bending power of authority. This idea especially stuck around the time the experiment took place, the early 1960’s. America was still somewhat fresh off of World War II, and Americans were shocked to see that they were just as capable of being pushed to do things that went against their morals as Germans were under Nazi authorities. Milgram was thorough in his studies by including multiple permutations of the original where he tested subjects responses to different forms of authority.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Another real-world example of social constructionism that also shows itself in the Stanford Prison Experiment is the bystander effect. The bystander effect is a psychological theory that refers to the tendency of individuals to not offer help or assistance to a victim in the presence of others. Psychologist believe that the probability of a victim receiving assistance decreases as the number of bystanders or witnesses increase. One classic explanation of this theory came from two social psychologists, Bibb Latane and John M. Darley, who decided that they needed to conduct a number of experiments to test the theory of bystander apathy after receiving inspiration from a very riveting court case at the time; The murder of Kitty Genovese. In 1964,…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conclusion The Milgram experiment, in today’s time, is used to show what experiments influenced the code of ethics that is now used. Incorporated with schools, students that learn psychology and social psychology are educated about this experiment to study about the code of ethics. When the students learn about the code of ethics, this experiment falls on two of the codes that are violated: the participant should be informed on why the experiment is being conducted and the experiment should not harm the…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical guidelines are crucial in research to minimise unnecessary physical or psychological harm to participants in an experiment. Before ethical guidelines existed in research, several experiments were not conducted ethically. In 1963, American psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted Milgram’s Study of Obedience investigating participants' obedience towards authority. The study demonstrated multiple ethical issues which proved the importance of ethics in research. This report will address the ethical principles that Milgram's study covered poorly and how they could be modified to improve the study.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This experiment went wrong and led to mental problems. These problems became so extreme that the experiment was discontinued after 6 days instead of 2 weeks. The Stanford Prison Experiment called into question the idea of Good vs Evil. The experiment showed how situational journey can cause an individual to “compromise” their beliefs. This change in behavior lead to psychological conflict among the “guards” and “prisoners.”…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays