DWI court

A counter argument to ‘State v. Black’ would of course be the case of ‘State v. Oliver.’ Yet, this case should not apply to my client nor should it have an effect on the outcome of his case. Other than the fact that both of the husbands in each case disciplined their wives, there are no similarities to be drawn. Yes, both husbands did hit their significant others, but this argument is a weak one, as one husband (Richard Oliver) was far crueler, inflicted major physical damage and perhaps had ill…

American Jury System Is the American jury system still a good idea today? The American jury system was a system first started in England hundreds of years ago. If in the community a crime were committed the accused would be brought to court with a judge and jury. I believe the jury system is still a good idea for today’s community for the reason that it keeps citizens involved in the judicial branch. Also the jury is usually correct. Lastly it keeps the civic rituals of the jury system. I…

United States courts have seven key types of jurisdiction. The first type of jurisdiction is personal jurisdiction. Personal Jurisdiction is the authority the court has over the person. The second type of jurisdiction is subject matter jurisdiction. Subject Matter Jurisdiction is the authority granted upon a court to hear a particular type of case. The third type of jurisdiction is geographical jurisdiction. Geographical jurisdiction is the authority the court has to hear cases that arise…

Angela M. Blythe, lawyer, 51, Oakland, Maryland, was sentenced by a government jury of plotting to confer bank extortion, bank misrepresentation and two checks of putting forth a false expression to a bank. Blythe was a lawyer authorized to practice in Maryland and West Virginia, with an office in Oakland, Maryland. She was a settlement lawyer in land exchanges. As indicated by proof displayed at the nine day trial, from 2000 to 2006, Blythe arranged deeds, home loans and notes utilizing false…

Well let’s see, there is this one mistake that always has me on my toes. The mistake I made was, I was being trained on a new program for our courthouse. I am advanced with technology and computers. Anyways we were told by our supervisors that our procedures or the citations have not changed, but the steps on how we process it have. Well I thought I knew it since I had received an award for diversity and professionalism, because I actually wrote the procedures that were in play for our policies.…

The court held that Mr Shafron is an officer under the section 9(b)(i) as he was closely involved in forming decisions, irrespective of being the ultimate decision maker. The Court stated that Mr Shafron was an employee and not an external advisor of the company (High court of Australia, 2012). Arguments of the parties and analysis Based on the section 180(1) of the act, the court stated that it is not possible that Mr Shafron could perform some duties as a company secretary and others as a…

Benekos, & Champion, 2017). At Jones’s hearing the courts determined that Jones needed to be tried as an adult as well. Jones did not agree with the courts and petition for habeas corpus. Jones complained that the criminal trial would then put him in double jeopardy (Oyez, 2017). Double jeopardy is when an offender is prosecuted for the same offense after conviction was made and given multiple punishments for the same offence at different degrees. The courts denied his writ and the case then…

mandatory sentence of life without parole. Miller’s defense attorney motioned for a new trial arguing that the sentence to life with parole violated Miller’s Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Circuit Court denied the initial motion, which led to appealing to the Alabama Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals held that Miller’s conviction was not unconstitutional despite his age. The utilitarian view of ethics places locus of right and wrong solely on the consequence of choosing one’s action…

PLAINTIFF’S TRIAL BRIEF REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COMES Plaintiff Lauren Coon, who makes and files this Trial Brief regarding the admissibility of Stanley’s criminal convictions, and will respectfully show the court the following: 1. Under rule 404 of the Texas Rules of evidence, “a party accused of conduct involving moral turpitude may offer evidence of the party’s pertinent trait, and if the evidence is admitted, the accusing…

The supreme court of Illinois ruled in favor of Rosewood Care Center, meaning that Caterpillar was held liable to cover the costs of Betty Jo Cooks care at treatment while she was recovering. The appellate court held that a promise to pay the debt of another is subject to the statute of frauds, because the employer promised to pay for the employee's care before the debt came into existence, the employer's promise to pay was not subject to the statute of frauds and that the health care provider's…