The Stanford Prison Experiment Essay

Part A 1. What was your initial reaction to viewing the footage of this experiment? Initially I felt taken back by the fact this experiment was used on 3rd graders. It seemed as those the children took to it quickly and began to adopt the same feelings the teacher was projecting about the brown eyed students. I did also find it far more educational to see the experiment carried out, rather then just reading about it. The students quickly formed opinions based on their classmates in the matter…

Latane, put together two well thought out experiments to rationalize the response time of individuals in groups. After reading about the brutal attack of Catherine Genovese in New York in 1964, which ultimately lead to her death, the two men were on a mission to figure out why nobody helped. Even with the witnesses being awakened by her screams, they chose to do nothing about it until it was too late. After Darley and Latane had the results from the experiments, they established five simple…

with the hood down. The sweatshirt was made more recognizable by having 2 patches placed on it. One patch was white and red and the other patch was white and blue; In part 1 of the study, participants were randomly assigned a condition and viewed a video, after which they were asked to give a description of the thief and his clothing. A five minute delay was then put in place, After this participants read instructions and viewed the show up. Two or three days after part 1, participants…

his mouth, accidentally killing him. Although the marines knew the order was unethical, why did they obey it anyways? Stanley Milgram's experiment greatly relates to this behavior. He had an authoritative figure dressed in a lab coat order the subject to read the word pairs and increase the voltage (Milgram 79). Previously informed that they could leave the experiment at any time, the majority of the subjects continued to obey authority (85). If the man giving orders would have been dressed…

Stanley had created an experiment to see how people would act when putting harm on an innocent person. According to Milgram, the point of the experiment was to “see how far a person will proceed in a concrete and measurable situation in which he is ordered to inflict increasing pain…”(170). The experiment took place in a Laboratory in Yale University. It involved two volunteers, the teacher and the learner, besides…

1. Explain and discuss the background events and ideas which led to Milgram’s research. Stanley Milgram (1963) was a American social psychologist who carried out the destructive obedience experiment at Yale University in 1963. He was very interested in how far people would go in a situation where it meant hurting another person under an authority figures orders. If an authority figure affected obedience levels in everyday American men. This idea came about after Adolf Eichmann's trial in…

Today I chose this experiment because I really wanted to try something new like Crystals. I tought Crystals would be interesting and fun because I would see the process while Crystals Form. My experiment will Impact the world around me because It will show people a new way of how crystals will be formed. This will also help the world around me because It will let the People figure out the real cost of Crystals and how much could they earn growing them. Scientists or Geologists could figure out…

Philip’s psychological experiments show the bizarre power of situations to dominate what he refers to as “better angels of our nature” (Brooks). He also outlines the predictability in situational evil situations referring to the effects of deindividuation and dehumanization on “ordinary…

today, it raises us to believe that obedience is good and disobedience is bad. Stanley Milgram is well known for his experiments on obedience, they are considered to be the "most important social-psychological experiments of all time" (Milgram Two). Milgram was criticized by many and was often cited as a psychologist who deceived many people through his experiments. His experiment Obedience to Authority consisted of a phony shocking device, a learner, a teacher, and the experimenter, also known…

The experiment in “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram, Yale psychologist, has triggered many responses to the question of an individual’s willingness to obey and the credibility of the experiment he performed. Ian Parker, a regular writer for the New Yorker and common voice in other political/scientific compositions, has come to the table with his opinion and outside sources to discuss the facts of Milgram’s experiment and its consequences in his essay, “Obedience.” Milgram claims…