Against Death Penalty

Better Essays
Should the death penalty be abolished? The answer is a resonating, no. I say this because even though the death penalty in my mind is against what I believe about not killing humans, we have human killing other humans. So with that there must be a punishment that can help deter the murderers of this world not to kill. That is exactly what the death penalty does it helps deter someone from killing another person by threatening their own life by capital punishment. Now of course as with all other controversial topics not everyone is on board with this idea.
One of those people is named Michael Welch. Welch believes that the death penalty should be abolished. Welch also believes that there are two reasons for the dealt penalty, one being
…show more content…
Whether or not they can be would depend on the degree of passion; it is unlikely to be always so extreme as to make the person seized by totally undetterable. At any rate, offenders sentenced to death ordinarily are guilty or premeditated murder, or multiple murders.”-“Whatever the motive some prospective offenders are not deterrable at all, others are easily deterred, and most are in between. Even if only some murders were, or could be deterred by capital punishment, it would be worthwhile.” (van den Haag, 256).
Van den haag makes a great point here that cannot be ignored why do we have to abolish the death penalty if it works? Even if it works only on a few people as a deterrent, why get rid of it. If it saves one life it is worth having on the books, that’s not to say that we should just be using it instead of incarceration, but we should have it in case there is a person or case in which it would be beneficial to use it
…show more content…
Gray really cuts into the real reasons here that we as “scared” people, the majority, are ok with the death penalty. It helps put to ease our minds that a person commits a crime, will be taken care of in a manner fitting to that of their crime.
In conclusion, the death penalty should not be abolished. “The death penalty question is often framed in utilitarian terms of net balance: rights of victims versus rights to life of the convicted” (House, 680). We as a society should keep in mind the rights of the victims. If we ourselves have never had to deal with someone murdering one of our family or friends who are we really to judge if the death penalty should be used or not used? Yet, we should have it though because it does work as deterrence and it should be an option, in the case of a heinous

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    He becomes a big supporter of the death penalty which is dominant in his paper where he list different objections to the death penalty than counteracts them. Koch starts off by saying that the death penalty is simply barbaric. The action itself is not barbaric due to its purpose of killing without suffering. A down side of killing people is you cannot take the death penalty back. Once they are dead its over no mulligans, so it should be difficult to make this decision.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are several debatable issues that face our society today, and one of these issues is capital punishment. Also referred to as the death penalty, this issue involves the question of whether it is moral or immoral to kill humans who have been found guilty of a horrible crime, which in most cases is murder. I will defend my position that capital punishment, though immoral in most cases, can be moral in special instances by starting off with addressing the matters of retribution and justice with regards to capital punishment using Kantian and virtue ethics, respectively. Sequentially, I will highlight two objections to my position involving the issues with cost and inhumanity and innocence and offer responses. My first argument begins with…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Also, citizens should decide whether the death penalty is being used justly or being unfairly used against certain people. The pro side for capital punishment believes that it should be allowed. People on the pro side believe that a person should pay for what act of violence they committed by taking away his or her life since that person took another life. These people believe that the death penalty would be used as a form of deterrence meaning that the thought of dying for a crime would keep people from committing crime. A result from that, they believe, is that it would lower crime.…

    • 2346 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Certainly, Reiman’s moderate theory of retribution provides a pathway to abolishing the death penalty because many individuals that are given the death penalty are victims of an aggressive and overly reactionary criminal justice system. This is one way to argue in favor of removing the death penalty through Reiman’s argument on reactionary cycle of a “eye for an eye” mentality, which creates extreme judgments that cannot be overturned if the individual is later found to be innocent. Reiman is aware of the long tradition of the death penalty as a form of retributive justice, but he finds it impractical in terms of being an accurate judge of the intent and motives of the alleged…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Imposing The Death Penalty

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capital punishment can be a tough topic to discuss because people tend to have extreme views and opinions on it. The death penalty is a quality to society; it prevents possible criminals as well as serves revenge to criminals, and is in no way depraved. The arguments contrary to the death penalty regularly do not hold up when examined more thoroughly. It is vital that everyone is united on this subject, rather than having some states practice capital punishment while others do not. The death penalty can be a beneficial tool in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the nastiest crimes known to society.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This would change our view towards every person that has committed murder, or even people who committed horrific crimes. With a Subjectivism system, I would have a certain amount of people be the judge of a person’s case. This could change the death penalty completely; it gives people an opportunity to observe a case deeply, not just to judge a person on what his actions were. Actions don’t describe a person as a human being, and that’s why I think Stephen eye for an eye system was wrong. You can’t punish someone based on what they did; Subjectivism will give anyone on this planet a chance to avoid the death penalty.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If the death penalty deters murder and we did not use it, murders of innocent people will occur which could have been prevented. If the death penalty does not deter murder and we use it, executions of murderers will occur with out deterring. Preventable executions are preferable to preventable murders of innocent people. Of the two morally undesirable outcomes, we must pick one with the preferable results. Therefore, we should use the death penalty”.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In other words, something that is said to keep in your conscious that if you do this, this will happen to you. The death penalty or capital punishment has been said that it has deterred crime. Many individuals who are going to commit a crime can always have in their conscious that if they get caught it can mean the end of their lives so they choose not to do the crime. We put killers to death, and as a deterrent to others out there see what the price will be if they kill an innocent victim. Another reason why I believe in the death penalty is that it has many pros to it like: it serves justice if the punishment fits the crime, it holds the criminal responsible for his actions and it will stop the criminal from committing further crimes because he/she is…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I also think we should abolish the death penalty because killing a human for what they did wrong such as murder, will not solve the problem or give the victim permanent relief, it will only be temporary and we are just as wrong as them when they committed the crime. Nathanson states that this does not solve the problem at all because we are still acting barbarically to those who are guilty of a barbaric crime. If we continue to punish the wrongdoers with the same violent actions, we are setting an example that violence is the answer to our problems and that it is morally right. That is not what should be done we should not have to punish the wrongdoer with a severe punishment like the death penalty to get our point across. Like Nathanson says we should want the state to set the right example, and the only violence that is…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One major aspect of the death penalty that works in favor of society is that it preconditions the minds of the perpetrator (Gealogo). The death penalty does act as a deterrent to crime as the person planning to, terrorize, murder, rape etc,) will think twice before carrying out major acts of violence. If the likeliness for a crime to be committed goes down because of fear of the death penalty, the only outcome is positive as it provides safety for the general public (Gealogo). This shines light upon a major drawback that would come of abolishing the death penalty, as it shows weakness and tolerance for unacceptable, violent crimes. In addition, a major weighing factor for the death penalty is justice for the victim(s) and their families (Steroff).…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays