Essay Why The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

Improved Essays
The death penalty should be abolished in the rest of the states that it remains legal in. “The death penalty is the ultimate irreversible denial of human rights.”(Insert Citation) The U.S.A is one of the only nine countries in the world to have carried out an execution every year, in the years 2009 and 2013. The other countries that still carry out the death penalty are Bangladesh, China, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Yemen. There are a few reasons as to why it should be abolished. The first reason would be race issues. The reason race is an important reason for it to be abolished is because the races can only recognize differences in their own race vs other races. The second reason as to why the death penalty should be abolished is due to mental illness. People with a mental illness who are put on death row are at a disadvantage because, at the time they committed the crime they aren’t always fully cognitive. The third reason as to why the death penalty should be abolished is because of DNA exonerations. With new technologies old death row inmates are being …show more content…
Although it shouldn’t be an excuse to get away with murder or assault, people who have actual mental illness they should not be executed. Since 1983 over 60 people with mental illness or retardation have been executed in the United States. But, there are some states that have passed legislations or proposed the ideas for legislations that make the execution of someone with mental retardation or just mental illness exempt from being executed. For example Connecticut, it is the only state that has passed actual legislation that exempts people who suffer mental illness from being sentenced to death. Other states have suggested such legislation but none of them have passed them, Indiana for example considered passing a legislation like this in 2009 but they didn’t make any moves to further it after

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has always been very important in many first world countries, and cities. Its implementation has been regarded as a necessary punishment for criminals that have done something unforgivable or done something against the law; for example, killing has always been the main example of a crime that people have been sentenced to death for. The US, China and Saudi Arabia countries where world leaders have authority, still use the death penalty and see it as a tool to scare and control the people to stop doing major crimes, but countries like the UK and most of Europe have stopped this death penalty due to it being too inhumane and savage as they think people should not be killed by other people, whatever the case.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Death Penalty has been the consequence of many unlawful crimes since the early 1600’s and even before that. Some crimes are so gruesome that they can result in the death of the people who committed that crime. The methods that are used to execute inmates that are given the death penalty are lethal injection, which is one of the most common methods, electrocution, gas chambers, hanging, and firing squad. Most of these methods are just as inhumane as the crimes that are committed to receive this punishment. The death penalty should be banned for many reasons, some of those reasons are that financially it cost more to execute someone than to give them life in prison, someone could be wrongly accused and given the death penalty for crimes they…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine for a moment, that someone inflicted a horrendous, illegal act to hurt either you or one of your loved ones. Do you then believe that that individual should be put to death for what he/she has done? That the government should be allowed to take away that person’s life, one where they may have their own family, a disability or mental illness, or loved ones of their own? Capital punishment is defined by Oxford Dictionaries as “the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime” (1). I find it hard to believe that the government is killing people, their own people, for violent crimes when the punishment they could be giving would be much more humane and justifiable. We first saw cases of the death penalty in the 18th Century BC with Hammurabi’s Code of “an eye for an eye”, and we still see people being killed for crimes they’ve committed to this day. No matter how horrible the crime committed by an individual may be, they should…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is the ultimate price to pay. Literally. Not only that, but it is the height of hypocrisy. How can one be proclaimed a killer and then be killed themselves? Is it a fair and just ending, or a waste of time, money and people? We stand in affirmation of the resolved: that the death penalty ought to be eliminated as a form of punishment administered to criminals. Racial prejudice unfairly plays a role when people are sentenced, the cost for death penalty cases is staggering, and innocent people are murdered, with new evidence being later discovered that proves them not guilty.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many philosophers endorse the death penalty since it “serves as justice” when a serious crime is committed. Many retributivist and consequentialist believe that wrongdoers should be subjected to the death penalty if they commit crimes of the highest degree such as murder, terrorism, etc. Many Philosophers also believe that the death penalty can deter and prevent However, this belief is deeply flawed, as the death penalty fails not only philosophically, but also statistically. The death penalty is not only unnecessary, but also immoral being that it de-humanizes people with an extreme degree, does not generate enough intrinsic value to succeed that of life imprisonment, and does not deter, or prevent horrendous crimes.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty how much does society really knows or understand about the process? Many people view the death penalty a justice “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth ( mathew5:38).” The victim’s family might feel that the criminal is to be punished to the highest degree for his crime. Most people feel that is justice. However, most people do not really know much about the process of executing a death row inmate, how much more the death penalty cost comparing with keeping an inmate in prison for life without parole. The death penalty is unethical and waste of millions of dollars, because the death penalty is a very slow process, and waste of taxpayers’ money.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty should be abolished because the punishment is inhumane and morally wrong. The penalty does not give justice because it treats the convicted criminal as less than a person. Killing a person does not save more lives. It even cost almost 3,000,000 to just kill one person because of lengthy trials and appeals. Seven states have already abolished the death penalty because they know it is not the just punishment. By abolishing the death penalty in the United States it makes American society more moral and…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The use of the death penalty dates back all the way before the 5th century. People have been sentenced to death for over thousands of years. Currently, 31 states have the death penalty, and 18 sates and the District of Columbia do not have the death penalty. The United States Supreme Court suspended the death penalty, in 1972, because it was unconstitutional. That suspension was short lived because the Court lifted the suspension in 1976. Lethal injection is the most common method of execution, yet there are states that use other methods, including electrocution, gas chambers, hanging, and firing squads. Many of the people who are pro death penalty believe that it will stop criminals from committing crimes. Research doesn 't support that claim. The system isn 't perfect, so unfortunately, there are innocent people who are imprisoned. This runs the risk of innocent people being wrongfully executed due to the death penalty being in place. Cameron Todd Willington from Texas was wrongfully executed in 2004 even though there was strong evidence and forensics that proved his innocence. No matter what people think or say, the death penalty is not effective. It is not worth the risk of executing an innocent person, the cost, and it doesn 't make criminals not want to commit…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is a punishment of execution to people that break national laws. Last year alone there were 34 executions total in the US alone which has actually gone down from the past. The time it takes to process an event for a circumstance where the death penalty is needed is a great amount of time. It can take months to years to process the death penalty. I chose this topic because “felons” do crimes and giving them the right punishment is key.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The controversial topic of the death penalty has been present in the United States for many years and with each year more moral evidence emerges to support these varying opinions. People have different views and with each view, the truth becomes harder to find. In the search for the facts, a few particular points from various articles stand out. Although some of the arguments for the death penalty are valid, the ones against are much stronger. Through several experienced and knowledgeable authors the arguments of maldistribution, arbitrariness of capital punishment, and inhumane violence provide strong evidence against the death penalty to prove the need for disbanding it.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1991 Ray Krone was wrongfully convicted of murder. He was immediately faced with the death penalty. It wasn’t until after years on death row and 10 years total in prison that he was proven innocent because of a new DNA test (McKellar). This is just one example of the poor system of execution in the United States. The death penalty has been around in the states since colonial times.It has always had people opposed to it but after many legal pressures the United States congress declared the death penalty unconstitutional in 1972. After 4 years the court reversed its decision. The death penalty has been carried out in many ways in the United States since then for example firing squad, electric chair,…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has always been one of the most hotly debated issues in the United States. As our country grows older and wiser, however, evidence clearly points to the fact that the death penalty is not a good solution. If society punishes a murderer by murdering them then what are we saying about violence? If society decides to abolish the death penalty, the impacts would free up taxpayer dollars to focus on law enforcement, schools, drug treatment centers, and other government institutions that help prevent crime. However, if the decision to not abolish the death penalty is made, the impacts will be a higher murder rate and a higher risk of…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The need to decide what to do with law breaking citizens has been a controversial issue throughout the ages. Some people believe that being in a prison for the rest of their lives is enough punishment for these criminals. However, one can see that society, instead, is punished twice. First, the criminals violate society through heinous felonies. Then, it is financially depleted by supporting these criminals until they die in prison. Although there are many arguments against the death penalty, various and numerous reasons, backed up by facts, argue for it. The ensuing paragraphs will justify why the death penalty is beneficial to society and its citizens the most.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Law are made to be obeyed by citizens. Yet, there are many people who goes against the law and does something unhuman. Murdering a person is a serious crime, accident or not. For the people who kill, there are many ways to pay the price of the lives they took. The most extreme is the death penalty. The death penalty allows our country to kill a man who did something unjust. Many people claim that the death penalty is something good for the society. Claiming that the murderer won’t do it again and that they should have the same ending as their victims did. On the other hand, people who are up on the death penalty could be innocents that were falsely accused. Also, the death penalty cost the government a lot of money and is usually racially biased. The death penalty should be abolished because the government contributing unnecessary large amount of funding, it’s racially biased, and could be killing innocent and violates our rights.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty should never be applied as a punishment to a person convicted of intentionally killing another person because the death penalty is a costly, unfair punishment that does not benefit society as a whole.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays