Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished

Improved Essays
Capital punishment should be abolished because it is too expensive to retain, it is revenge not justice, and it 's possible for innocent people to be executed. The execution of human life should not be something we advocate here in the United States, it’s sad that as a nation we preach peace while still executing our citizens. The millions of dollars being wasted on executions could be spent improving our criminal justice system, and in doing so, improve our country. Not only is the death penalty a waste of our hard earned tax dollars, but it also puts innocent lives at risk. Mistreated or mishandled evidence can easily put an innocent life on death row. The death penalty advocates revenge and takes the meaning of justice away, and if we were …show more content…
Since the reestablishment of the death penalty in 1977, there have been multiple documented cases of falsely accused people ending up on death row for crimes they did not commit. The majority of these people were convicted due to improperly handled evidence by either attorneys, police, or forensic specialists. According to Lester, 1993 an investigation into the then current Chief Serologist of San Antonio, Texas, revealed over 133 cases of murder and rape in which the evidence was falsely or incorrectly tested, resulting in convictions of innocent people. One of these cases in particular saw an innocent man placed on death row for three years, for a murder he did not commit, and had absolutely nothing to do with. These wrongfully imprisoned people will never get the years of their life back that were stolen by the faulty justice system. Further, the fact that there have been without a doubt many innocent people put to death in our country due to these faults is horrifying (n.p.). We have many unfortunate flaws in our justice system which can lead to the mistreatment and possible execution of valued human life. Human error should never be the cause of someone 's life being taken. The only real way to keep these tragic incidents from happening, would be to abolish the death penalty

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It’s not making things better, but only worse, specially to their families! The Death Penalty is a violation of natural rights. We need to replace the Death Penalty and make it a safer and more inexpensive option. It does not guarantee safety for innocent victims, and it does not follow the goals and promises to our nation. The Death Penalty is very effective, and does not make things get better.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How can we say justice is served by executing someone’s beloved? A man may take another man’s life but who are we to say he should be beheaded? Life is not fair, no one wants to see a killer living when our loved ones are gone but we must not forget that they are also someone’s beloved. No man should have the power to decide another man’s life or death since everyone is equal. Execution is not only cruel but can also lead to killing an innocent man, and it costs millions for one death penalty and sometimes put innocent’s life at risk, more importantly there is no taking back once it is done.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty kills people and it could be a faulty conviction. There have been many cases where the DNA was not tested before execution and it resulted in innocent people getting killed. An example of an innocent person killed is about Carlos DeLuna who was convicted in 1983 and executed in1989. According to Executed But Possibly Innocent, “A Chicago Tribune investigation released in 2006 revealed groundbreaking evidence that Texas may have executed an innocent man in 1989. New evidence uncovered by reporters Maurice Possley and Steve Mills casts doubt on DeLuna’s guilt and points towards another man, Carlos Hernandez, who had a record of similar crimes and repeatedly confessed to the murder.” This is just one of the many cases where innocent people are killed for no reason.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is where burns theory falls apart, because I don’t think burns himself could even answer this question without making, some sort of loophole in his theory. If we kill anyone of these people we are saying that the justice system can be wrong, and if that is true then burns idea, that the justice system is always right is flawed, and that the justice system is killing innocent…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Innocents are at risk of losing their lives for something they never did, and there has been many cases in the past where innocents have unfortunately died. Killing someone because they had killed someone is an unforgiving sentiment, and only serves to preserve the violent nature of society which may potentially lead to more people dying. The argument that the death penalty serves as a deterrent for crime is a false argument; not only does it do absolutely nothing to slow down the crime rate, it can lead to increase in the crime rate. Economic issues are found with the usage of the death penalty, that states spend an abnormal amount of money on cases with the death penalty and gaining nothing from it. The money should be more wisely invested, such as areas that are in critical need of funding.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If the rest of the states follow then it makes the United States open to a new idea of society. One that’s punishments are not cruel and morally wrong and are fair. The death penalty should be abolished because the punishment is inhumane and morally wrong. The penalty does not give justice because it treats the convicted criminal as less than a person. Killing a person does not save more lives.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The government could be using this money to create a better community for the people. According to Charles M. Harris, “All the states death sentences to life imprisonment would immediately result in millions of dollars in savings per year” (Harris). This reveals that the government is spending too much time focusing on the death penalty and not enough time trying to maintain a safe society for the people. The death penalty should also be abolished because it is a cruel punishment. It does not solve any conflict.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We’ve created a system that’s not just unconstitutional arbitrary” (Banks). By spending a bunch of money through taxpayers, people lose money and are not able to use it for any other situations in their life. People’s money is being used to put others to death, so what makes them better than the criminals. The Capital Punishment is an extremely serious matter because it deciphers whether or not a person lives or dies. The pros to the Death Penalty are it is deserved punishment, brings closure, and it keeps criminals off the streets.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminals get the easy way out of all the shame and guilt they feel. The death penalty should be abolished, due to pitiful Supreme Court cases and alternatives to the irrevocable death penalty.…

    • 1825 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminals don’t deserve a punishment that effects everyone around them. They deserve to sit in prison for life. They shouldn’t be put to death that’s an easy way out. The death penalty should be abolished in the United States because it violates human rights, it is highly expensive, and it has systematic problems. Those who approve the death penalty believe that it brings justice to the victims’ families and they see it as an “eye for an eye” revenge.…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics